BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2026; 14(1): 116047
Published online Jan 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i1.116047
Table 1 Basic characteristics of patients with transoral approach and areolar thyroidectomy, mean ± SD
Ref.
Country
Age/years
Females
Type of operation
Pathology
Guo et al[14]China29.8 ± 0.96 vs 33.75 ± 1.19All womenLobectomyPapillary thyroid microcarcinomas
Shen et al[15]China37.8 ± 12.4 vs 41.2 ± 11.963.2% vs 64.9%LobectomyBenign thyroid nodules
Xu et al[9]China30.46 ± 6.93 vs 33.3 ± 6.94 91.7% vs 88.6%LobectomyPapillary thyroid microcarcinomas
Yan et al[8]China32.14 ± 6.54 vs 34.56 ± 7.0673.8% vs 83.3%LobectomyPapillary thyroid microcarcinoma
Zhang et al[17]China22.2 ± 3.0 vs 23.7 ± 3.891.7% vs 100%LobectomyUnilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma
Zhang et al[16]China33.4 ± 6.8 vs 34.4 ± 7.670.4% vs 100%LobectomyUnilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma
Table 2 Postoperative infections among patients with transoral approach and areolar thyroidectomy
Ref.
Country
Study type
TOETVA
Areolar approach
Results
Guo et al[14]ChinaRetrospective1/400/40Not significant
Shen et al[15]ChinaProspective1/573/74Not significant
Xu et al[9]ChinaRetrospective1/481/44Not significant
Yan et al[8]ChinaRetrospective3/482/42Not significant
Zhang et al[17]ChinaRetrospective1/600/65Not significant
Zhang et al[16]ChinaRetrospective1/450/50Not significant
Table 3 Swallowing difficulties among patients with transoral approach and areolar thyroidectomy
Ref.
Country
Study type
TOETVA
Areolar approach
Results
Shen et al[15]ChinaProspective3/577/74Significant
Xu et al[9]ChinaRetrospective3/482/44Significant
Zhang et al[16]ChinaRetrospective2/451/50Not significant
Table 4 The risk of bias of the included studies (Newcastle Ottawa Scale)
Ref.
Selection
Compatibility
Outcome
Score
Guo et al[14]2237
Shen et al[15]2237
Xu et al[9]2237
Yan et al[8]2237
Zhang et al[17]2136
Zhang et al[16]2237