Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Virol. Mar 25, 2026; 15(1): 118602
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v15.i1.118602
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v15.i1.118602
Table 1 Distribution of beta-lactamase producing Klebsiella isolates among various clinical specimens, n (%)
| Specimen | ESBL producers (n = 77) | AmpC producers (n = 62) |
| Pus (n = 55) | 35 (63.63) | 27 (49) |
| Blood (n = 10) | 6 (60) | 2 (20) |
| Catheter tip (n = 1) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) |
| Body fluid (n = 21) | 12 (57.1) | 8 (38) |
| Endotracheal aspirate (n = 4) | 3 (75) | 4 (100) |
| Sputum (n = 12) | 6 (50) | 3 (25) |
| Urine (n = 27) | 14 (51.8) | 17 (62.96) |
| Total = 130 | 59.2% | 47.7% |
Table 2 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producing vs non-extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producing Klebsiella isolates, n (%)
| Antibiotics | ESBL producers (n = 77) | Non ESBL producers (n = 53) | χ2 statistics | P value | ||||
| Susceptible | Resistance | Intermediate | Susceptible | Resistance | Intermediate | |||
| Ampicillin | 0 (0) | 77 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 53 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 | 1 |
| Amoxicillin | 0 (0) | 77 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 53 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 | 1 |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid | 14 (18.2) | 59 (76.6) | 4 (5.2) | 18 (33.9) | 34 (64.1) | 1 (1.9) | 4.75 | 0.09 |
| Cefotaxime | 1 (1.3) | 75 (97.4) | 1 (1.3) | 22 (41.5) | 30 (56.6) | 1 (1.9) | 35.22 | < 0.0001a |
| Ceftazidime | 1 (1.3) | 76 (98.7) | 0 (0) | 23 (43.3) | 30 (56.6) | 0 (0) | 37 | < 0.0001a |
| Ciproflaxacin | 5 (6.5) | 71 (92.2) | 1 (1.3) | 10 (18.9) | 40 (75.4) | 3 (5.6) | 7.14 | 0.03a |
| Gentamicin | 46 (59.7) | 31 (40.3) | 0 (0) | 35 (66.0) | 17 (32.1) | 1 (1.9) | 2.22 | 0.33 |
| Amikacin | 38 (49.4) | 35 (45.5) | 4 (5.2) | 25 (47.2) | 23 (43.3) | 5 (9.4) | 0.88 | 0.64 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 30 (39.0) | 41 (53.2) | 6 (7.8) | 18 (34.0) | 29 (54.7) | 6 (11.3) | 0.65 | 0.72 |
| Meropenem | 36 (46.8) | 41 (53.2) | 0 (0) | 25 (47.2) | 28 (52.8) | 0 (0) | 0 | 1 |
| Imipenem | 37 (48.1) | 39 (50.6) | 1 (1.3) | 25 (47.2) | 28 (52.8) | 0 (0) | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| Nitrofurantoin1 | 11 (78.6) | 3 (21.4) | 0 (0) | 2 (15.4) | 11 (84.6) | 0 (0) | 10.78 | 0.004a |
| Norfloxacin1 | 2 (14.3) | 12 (85.7) | 0 (0) | 5 (38.5) | 8 (61.5) | 0 (0) | 2.05 | 0.36 |
Table 3 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of AmpC producers vs non-AmpC producers among Klebsiella isolates, n (%)
| Antibiotics | AmpC producers (n = 62) | Non AmpC producers (n = 68) | χ2 statistics | P value | ||||
| Susceptible | Resistance | Intermediate | Susceptible | Resistance | Intermediate | |||
| Ampicillin | 0 (0) | 62 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 68 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 | 1 |
| Amoxicillin | 0 (0) | 62 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 68 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 | 1 |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid | 7 (11.29) | 50 (80.64) | 5 (8.06) | 25 (36.76) | 43 (63.23) | 0 (0) | 15.41 | 0.0005a |
| Cefotaxime | 8 (12.9) | 52 (83.87) | 2 (3.22) | 15 (22.5) | 53 (77.94) | 0 (0) | 3.87 | 0.14 |
| Ceftazidime | 9 (14.51) | 53 (85.48) | 0 (0) | 15 (22.5) | 53 (77.94) | 0 (0) | 1.23 | 0.54 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 4 (6.451) | 57 (91.93) | 1 (1.61) | 11 (16.17) | 54 (79.41) | 3 (4.41) | 4.08 | 0.13 |
| Gentamicin | 37 (59.67) | 24 (38.70) | 1 (1.61) | 44 (64.70) | 24 (35.29) | 0 (0) | 1.33 | 0.51 |
| Amikacin | 27 (43.54) | 27 (43.54) | 8 (12.9) | 34 (50) | 31 (45.58) | 3 (4.41) | 3.08 | 0.21 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 19 (30.64) | 39 (62.90) | 4 (6.451) | 29 (42.64) | 31 (45.58) | 8 (11.76) | 4.06 | 0.13 |
| Meropenem | 23 (37.09) | 39 (62.90) | 0 (0) | 38 (55.88) | 30 (44.11) | 0 (0) | 4.6 | 0.10 |
| Imipenem | 23 (37.09) | 38 (61.29) | 1 (1.61) | 39 (57.35) | 29 (42.64) | 0 (0) | 6.07 | 0.04a |
| Nitrofurantoin1 | 3 (17.64) | 14 (82.35) | 0 (0) | 2 (20) | 8 (80) | 0 (0) | 0.02 | 0.99 |
| Norfloxacin1 | 5 (29.41) | 12 (70.58) | 0 (0) | 2 (20) | 8 (80) | 0 (0) | 0.29 | 0.86 |
- Citation: Kaur H, Arora S, Sharma V, Kaur K, Kamboj S. Study of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and AmpC beta-lactamases producing Klebsiella from clinical samples in tertiary care hospital of Punjab. World J Virol 2026; 15(1): 118602
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v15/i1/118602.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v15.i1.118602
