Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Jan 19, 2026; 16(1): 110875
Published online Jan 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.110875
Published online Jan 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.110875
Table 1 Comparison of general information between the two groups, n (%)
| General information | Depression group (n = 42) | Non-occurrence group (n = 58) | Test statistic | P value |
| Sex | χ2 = 0.103 | 0.748 | ||
| Male | 24 (57.14) | 35 (60.34) | ||
| Female | 18 (42.86) | 23 (39.66) | ||
| Age (year), mean ± SD | 63.26 ± 4.10 | 63.85 ± 4.76 | t = 0.648 | 0.519 |
| Marital status | χ2 = 0.077 | 0.782 | ||
| Married | 37 (88.10) | 50 (86.21) | ||
| Unmarried/divorced/widowed | 5 (11.90) | 8 (13.79) | ||
| Monthly per capital income | χ2 = 5.609 | 0.018 | ||
| ≥ 5000 yuan | 16 (38.10) | 36 (62.07) | ||
| < 5000 yuan | 26 (61.90) | 22 (37.93) | ||
| Place of residence | χ2 = 0.201 | 0.654 | ||
| Urban | 20 (47.62) | 25 (43.10) | ||
| Rural | 22 (52.38) | 33 (56.90) | ||
| Comorbid hypertension | χ2 = 0.493 | 0.483 | ||
| Yes | 12 (28.57) | 13 (22.41) | ||
| No | 30 (71.43) | 45 (77.59) | ||
| Comorbid diabetes | χ2 = 0.027 | 0.870 | ||
| Yes | 10 (23.81) | 13 (22.41) | ||
| No | 32 (76.19) | 45 (77.59) | ||
| Drinking history | χ2 = 0.313 | 0.576 | ||
| Yes | 13 (30.95) | 15 (25.86) | ||
| No | 29 (69.05) | 43 (74.14) | ||
| Smoking history | χ2 = 3.024 | 0.082 | ||
| Yes | 11 (26.19) | 25 (43.10) | ||
| No | 31 (73.81) | 33 (56.90) | ||
| Social support | χ2 = 7.441 | 0.024 | ||
| Low | 17 (40.48) | 11 (18.97) | ||
| Medium | 15 (35.71) | 20 (34.48) | ||
| High | 10 (23.81) | 27 (46.55) | ||
| Education level | χ2 = 4.677 | 0.031 | ||
| High school and above | 14 (33.33) | 32 (55.17) | ||
| Junior high school and below | 28 (66.67) | 26 (44.83) | ||
| Sleep disorder | χ2 = 6.172 | 0.013 | ||
| Yes | 25 (59.52) | 20 (34.48) | ||
| No | 17 (40.48) | 38 (65.52) | ||
Table 2 Comparison of disease data between the two groups, n (%)
| Disease data | Depression group (n = 42) | Non-occurrence group (n = 58) | χ² | P value |
| Tumor location | 0.419 | 0.811 | ||
| Upper segment | 6 (14.29) | 10 (17.24) | ||
| Middle segment | 28 (66.67) | 35 (60.34) | ||
| Lower segment | 8 (19.05) | 13 (22.41) | ||
| Tumor type | 0.027 | 0.870 | ||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 32 (76.19) | 45 (77.59) | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 10 (23.81) | 13 (22.41) | ||
| Surgical treatment | 0.039 | 0.843 | ||
| Yes | 4 (9.52) | 5 (8.62) | ||
| No | 38 (90.48) | 53 (91.38) | ||
| Number of bone metastases | 0.201 | 0.654 | ||
| > 3 lesions | 22 (52.38) | 33 (56.90) | ||
| ≤ 3 lesions | 20 (47.62) | 25 (43.10) | ||
| Site of bone metastases | 0.066 | 0.797 | ||
| Axial bones (pelvis, spine) | 25 (59.52) | 36 (62.07) | ||
| Peripheral bones | 17 (40.48) | 22 (37.93) | ||
| Clinical stage | 0.164 | 0.685 | ||
| Stage I–II | 20 (47.62) | 30 (51.72) | ||
| Stage III–IV | 22 (52.38) | 28 (48.28) | ||
| Skeletal-related events | 0.041 | 0.839 | ||
| Yes | 8 (19.05) | 12 (20.69) | ||
| No | 34 (80.95) | 46 (79.31) | ||
Table 3 Comparison of laboratory indicators between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Laboratory indicator | Depression group (n = 42) | Non-occurrence group (n = 58) | t value | P value |
| WBC (× 109/L) | 3.20 ± 0.34 | 3.18 ± 0.39 | 0.267 | 0.790 |
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | 75.33 ± 6.68 | 62.35 ± 7.10 | 9.248 | < 0.001 |
| Total protein (g/L) | 64.33 ± 5.87 | 64.95 ± 5.29 | 0.552 | 0.582 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 38.02 ± 4.47 | 37.92 ± 4.25 | 0.114 | 0.910 |
Table 4 Description of independent variables
| Independent variable | Type | Assignment |
| Monthly household income per capital | Categorical | 1: < 5000 yuan |
| 0: ≥ 5000 yuan | ||
| Educational level | Categorical | 1: Junior high school or below |
| 0: High school or above | ||
| Social support | Categorical | 1: High |
| 2: Medium | ||
| 3: Low | ||
| Sleep disorder | Categorical | 1: Yes |
| 0: No | ||
| hs-CRP | Continuous | - |
| Smoking history | Categorical | 1: Yes |
| 0: No |
Table 5 Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for depression in patients with esophageal cancer and bone metastasis
| Variable | B | SE | Wald | P value | OR | 95%CI |
| Constant | -20.661 | 2.285 | 81.795 | < 0.001 | - | - |
| Monthly income per capital | 0.978 | 0.417 | 5.491 | 0.019 | 2.659 | 1.173-6.026 |
| Educational level | 0.901 | 0.421 | 4.588 | 0.032 | 2.462 | 1.080-5.613 |
| Social support (low) | 1.629 | 0.529 | 9.479 | 0.002 | 5.100 | 1.808-14.388 |
| Social support (medium) | 1.263 | 0.518 | 5.942 | 0.015 | 3.536 | 1.281-9.760 |
| Sleep disorder | 1.028 | 0.418 | 6.028 | 0.014 | 2.794 | 1.230-6.346 |
| hs-CRP | 0.273 | 0.054 | 25.848 | < 0.001 | 1.314 | 1.183-1.460 |
| Smoking history | -0.744 | 0.620 | 1.439 | 0.230 | 0.475 | 0.141-1.603 |
- Citation: Shi HJ, Huang SC, Wang BW. Analysis the incidence and related risk factors of depression in patients with esophageal cancer combined with bone metastasis. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(1): 110875
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i1/110875.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.110875
