Jameel F, Sahibdad I, Muhammad SG, Salim A. Wound pathophysiology and healing dynamics for stem cell-mediated therapeutics in different skin wounds. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(3): 115658 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i3.115658]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Asmat Salim, Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Main University Road, Karachi 75270, Sindh, Pakistan. asmat.salim@iccs.edu
Research Domain of This Article
Research & Experimental Medicine
Article-Type of This Article
Review
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Mar 26, 2026 (publication date) through Mar 28, 2026
Times Cited of This Article
Times Cited (0)
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Stem Cells
ISSN
1948-0210
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Jameel F, Sahibdad I, Muhammad SG, Salim A. Wound pathophysiology and healing dynamics for stem cell-mediated therapeutics in different skin wounds. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(3): 115658 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i3.115658]
Fatima Jameel, Iqra Sahibdad, Sidra Ghulam Muhammad, Asmat Salim, Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Sindh, Pakistan
Author contributions: Jameel F developed the framework of the manuscript, contributed to the literature compilation, and drafted the initial content; Sahibdad I and Muhammad SG assisted with the comprehensive literature search and helped in manuscript writing; Salim A conceptualized the review topic, provided critical input, and finalized the content with significant revisions.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Asmat Salim, Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Main University Road, Karachi 75270, Sindh, Pakistan. asmat.salim@iccs.edu
Received: October 22, 2025 Revised: December 4, 2025 Accepted: February 3, 2026 Published online: March 26, 2026 Processing time: 154 Days and 15 Hours
Abstract
Skin wound healing is a multifaceted and highly regulated biological event, which includes inflammation, cell proliferation, extracellular matrix deposition, neovascularization, and tissue remodeling. The underlying pathophysiological and healing dynamics of skin injuries vary significantly depending on the nature, depth, and etiology of the wound. Full-thickness excisional wounds, acid-induced chemical burns, and cold-induced burn injuries have distinct pathological patterns, each characterized by differential inflammatory cascades, oxidative stress levels, cellular infiltration, vascular compromise, and tissue regeneration dynamics. Understanding this heterogeneity necessitates the development of personalized therapeutic interventions that can address the specific challenges associated with each wound type. This review aims to explore experimental evidence of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapies across various wound models and to highlight their therapeutic potential and optimization strategies. MSCs have emerged as promising candidates for regenerative wound therapy due to their multipotency, paracrine activity, and immunomodulatory functions. This review highlights the remarkable potential of MSC-based treatments to accelerate healing, reduce inflammation, and promote scar less tissue regeneration in different experimental models, including full-thickness acid burn wounds, heat burn wounds, cold-induced injuries, and chronic vs acute excisional wounds. The therapeutic efficacy of MSCs has been substantially enhanced through various preconditioning strategies, such as chemical preconditioning with α-terpineol, isorhamnetin, quercetin, and rutin, as well as their incorporation into biocompatible scaffolds and hydrogel matrices. These approaches have improved stem cell viability, survival under hypoxic and oxidative conditions, engraftment efficiency, and functional integration into the host tissue. This review also presents a comparative analysis of the wound healing mechanisms and pathological features associated with different skin injury models while emphasizing the mechanistic role of MSCs in modulating these responses. It further explores the impact of stem cell preconditioning and advanced biomaterial-assisted delivery systems in optimizing regenerative outcomes. Collectively, the findings underscore the necessity for context-specific therapeutic strategies and confirm the translational potential of MSC-based interventions as adaptable, targeted, and clinically viable solutions for complex skin injuries. Moreover, the integration of biomaterials and preconditioning strategies offers promising avenues to overcome current limitations in MSC therapy, ultimately resulting in the advancement of regenerative dermatology.
Core Tip: Skin wound healing is a complex process affected by the type and severity of injury. This review provides a comparative overview of the pathophysiology of excisional, thermal, chemical, and cold-induced skin wounds while highlighting mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based regenerative strategies. It explains how MSCs modulate inflammation, promote angiogenesis, and support tissue remodeling through paracrine and immunomodulatory mechanisms. Additionally, it emphasizes optimizing MSC therapy via preconditioning (chemical, hypoxic, or genetic) and combining it with biomaterials like hydrogels and scaffolds to improve survival, engraftment, and functional recovery. The review also addresses translational barriers and the need for standardization in clinical applications, underscoring the potential of MSC-based treatments as future-oriented options for complex skin injuries.