Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2021; 9(29): 8740-8748
Published online Oct 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8740
Published online Oct 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8740
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics of insomnia patients in the treatment group and control group
Characteristic | Treatment, n = 40 | Control, n = 40 |
Age in yr, mean ± SD | 52.4 ± 11.5 | 51.3 ± 10.2 |
Male sex, n/total n (%) | 13/40 (32.5) | 15/40 (37.5) |
Married, n/total n (%) | 37/40 (92.5) | 38/40 (95) |
University graduate, n/total n (%) | 32/40 (80) | 34/40 (85) |
Table 2 Patient group Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score comparison before intervention
Group | Sleep quality | Sleep latency | Sleep duration | Sleep efficiency | Sleep disturbance | Hypnotic medication | Daytime dysfunction |
Treatment group, n = 40 | 2.83 ± 0.39 | 2.93 ± 0.42 | 2.93 ± 0.27 | 2.80 ± 0.41 | 2.70 ± 0.46 | 1.08 ± 0.83 | 2.53 ± 0.64 |
Control group, n = 40 | 2.70 ± 0.46 | 2.90 ± 0.30 | 2.93 ± 0.27 | 2.75 ± 0.44 | 2.73 ± 0.45 | 1.23 ± 1.00 | 2.63 ± 0.54 |
t | -1.311 | -0.391 | 0.000 | -0.530 | 0.244 | 0.731 | 0.755 |
P value | 0.194 | 0.697 | 1.000 | 0.598 | 0.808 | 0.467 | 0.452 |
Table 3 Patient group Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score comparison 1 wk after intervention
Group | Sleep quality | Sleep latency | Sleep duration | Sleep efficiency | Sleep disturbance | Daytime dysfunction |
Treatment group, n = 40 | 0.98 ± 0.36 | 2.55 ± 0.50 | 1.60 ± 0.63 | 1.75 ± 0.54 | 1.70 ± 0.56 | 1.63 ± 0.54 |
Control group, n = 40 | 1.05 ± 0.50 | 2.68 ± 0.47 | 1.60 ± 0.59 | 1.83 ± 0.45 | 1.70 ± 0.52 | 1.70 ± 0.46 |
t | 0.769 | 0.391 | 0.000 | 0.675 | 0.000 | 0.666 |
P value | 0.445 | 0.697 | 1.000 | 0.502 | 1.000 | 0.507 |
Table 4 Patient group Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score comparison 1 mo after intervention
Group | Sleep quality | Sleep latency | Sleep duration | Sleep efficiency | Sleep disturbance | Hypnotic medication use | Daytime dysfunction |
Treatment group, n = 40 | 0.95 ± 0.32 | 2.20 ± 0.41 | 1.48 ± 0.64 | 2.25 ± 0.59 | 1.50 ± 0.56 | 2.70 ± 0.79 | 1.55 ± 0.60 |
Control group, n = 40 | 1.28 ± 0.51 | 2.73 ± 0.45 | 2.40 ± 0.63 | 1.68 ± 0.47 | 2.39 ± 0.49 | 2.60 ± 0.84 | 2.38 ± 0.54 |
t | 3.446 | 5.469 | 6.502 | -4.812 | 7.475 | -0.548 | 6.481 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Patient group Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score comparison 3 mo after intervention
Group | Sleep quality | Sleep latency | Sleep duration | Sleep efficiency | Sleep disturbance | Hypnotic medication use | Daytime dysfunction |
Treatment group, n = 40 | 0.98 ± 0.48 | 1.98 ± 0.53 | 1.53 ± 0.60 | 2.35 ± 0.58 | 1.68 ± 0.53 | 0.53 ± 0.64 | 1.43 ± 0.50 |
Control group, n = 40 | 1.60 ± 0.63 | 2.80 ± 0.41 | 2.70 ± 0.56 | 1.63 ± 0.49 | 2.35 ± 0.53 | 0.93 ± 0.80 | 2.48 ± 0.51 |
t | 4.980 | 7.817 | 9.037 | -6.040 | 5.700 | 2.475 | 9.332 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Patient group Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale total score comparison before and after interventions
Group | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
1 wk | 1 mo | 3 mo | ||
Treatment group, n = 40 | 12.20 ± 4.07 | 5.60 ± 1.87 | 3.38 ± 1.68 | 2.75 ± 1.50 |
Control group, n = 40 | 11.18 ± 1.97 | 4.98 ± 1.75 | 6.05 ± 1.80 | 7.15 ± 2.28 |
t | -1.431 | -1.547 | 6.888 | 10.195 |
P value | 0.156 | 0.126 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 7 Patient group Insomnia Severity Index score comparison before and after interventions
Group | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
1 wk | 1 mo | 3 mo | ||
Treatment group, n = 40 | 22.13 ± 3.30 | 10.63 ± 1.96 | 5.75 ± 1.28 | 8.68 ± 2.26 |
Control group, n = 40 | 21.38 ± 2.88 | 11.95 ± 1.05 | 7.40 ± 2.45 | 3.38 ± 1.76 |
t | -1.083 | -0.974 | 3.781 | -11.699 |
P value | 0.282 | 0.333 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Su H, Xiao L, Ren Y, Xie H, Sun XH. Effects of mindful breathing combined with sleep-inducing exercises in patients with insomnia. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(29): 8740-8748
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i29/8740.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8740