BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 26, 2026; 14(6): 117269
Published online Feb 26, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i6.117269
Table 1 Socio-demographic variables of the new-borns with perinatal asphyxia
Variables
n
(%)
Child’s age in days
13845.2
23440.5
31214.3
Gender
Male4654.8
Female3845.2
Maternal age (years)
< 25 910.7
25-346071.4
35-441517.9
Gestational age (weeks)
37-407690.5
40-4289.5
Social class
Upper55.9
Middle3440.5
Lower4553.6
Table 2 Mean left ventricular mass and gender comparison between perinatal asphyxia with those without perinatal asphyxia
Comparison of LV mass
Asphyxia
Control
Mean7.910.1
SD2.30.7
t-test (P value)6.9 (0.001)a
Table 3 Mean left ventricular mass and gender comparison between perinatal asphyxia with those without perinatal asphyxia
Comparison of LV mass by gender
Male
Female
t-test (P value) (95%CI)
With asphyxia8.4 ± 2.47.5 ± 2.11.57 (0.120)
Without asphyxia9.4 ± 1.49.9 ± 0.61.17 (0.520)
Table 4 Comparison of age of new-born and mean left ventricular mass by severity of asphyxia
Severity of asphyxia
LV mass, mean ± SD (95%CI)
ANOVA
Severity by Sanat
Mild7.8 ± 2.3F = 1.26, P = 0.289
Moderate8.8 ± 2.5
Severe7.1 ± 1.5
Table 5 Comparison of age of new-born and mean left ventricular mass by severity of asphyxia
Age of newborn (days)
LV mass, mean ± SD, (95%CI)
ANOVA
18.1 ± 2.5F = 2.47, P = 0.7282
27.7 ± 1.9
37.7 ± 2.0
Table 6 Comparison of left ventricular mass by socioeconomic class
Social class
LV mass, mean ± SD (95%CI)
ANOVA
Upper7.6 ± 2.2F = 0.10, P = 0.905
Middle8.1 ± 2.5
Lower7.8 ± 2.1
Mode of delivery
SVD7.7 ± 2.4
CS8.1 ± 2.2
t-test (P value)-0.86 (0.391)