BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2025; 13(33): 107990
Published online Nov 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i33.107990
Table 1 Thrombus score classification using coronary angiography
Thrombus grade
Definition
Grade 0No thrombus
Grade 1Possible thrombus
Grade 2Small (greatest dimension ≤ 1/2 VD
Grade 3Moderate (> 1/2 but < 2 VD)
Grade 4Large (≥ 2 VD)
Grade 5Unable to assess TB due to vessel occlusion
Table 2 Landmark studies on thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction
Ref.
Sample size
Design and randomisation
TA catheter type
Primary endpoint
Finding
Byrne et al[1] (REMEDIA)100 STEMIStandard PCI (n = 49) vs Manual TA (n = 50)Diver CE catheterPost-procedure myocardial blush grade ≥ 2, and ST segment resolution ≥ 70%TA improves MBG (≥ 2) and STR (68.0% and 44.9% vs 58.0% and 36.7%, respectively) with OR 2.6 (95%CI: 1.2-5.9; P = 0.020) and OR 2.4 (95%CI: 1.1-5.3; P = 0.034), respectively. Direct stenting was more frequently used in TA than standard PCI groups (66% vs 24%). TA is feasible and improves the angiographic and ECG criteria of myocardial reperfusion compared to PCI alone
Szummer et al[2] (EXPIRA)175 STEMI +Standard PCI (n = 87) vs Manual TA + PCI (n = 88)Export Medtronic catheterPost-procedure myocardial blush grade ≥ 2, and ST segment resolution ≥ 70% at 90 min post-procedureTA improved MBG (≥ 2) and STR (88% vs 60%; P = 0.001; and 64% vs 39%; P = 0.001). The extent of microvascular obstruction defined by contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI was significantly lower in the TA group; TA significantly reduced infarct size at 3 months, and lower cardiac death was observed at 9 months
Rezkalla et al[3], Iwakura et al[4] (TAPAS)1071 STEMIStandard PCI (n = 536), manual TA + PCI (n = 535)Export Medtronic catheterMBG of 0 or 1, indicating poor myocardial perfusionMBG of 0 or 1 was significantly lower in the TA group (17.1%) compared to the conventional PCI group (26.3) (P < 0.001). Complete ST-segment resolution was more frequent in the TA group (56.6% vs 44.2%, P < 0.001), 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the TA group (3.6% vs 6.7%, P = 0.02), one-year mortality was also lower in TA group (3.6% vs 6.7%, P = 0.01)
van Lavieren et al[5], van 't Hof et al[6], Ndrepepa et al[7] (INFUSE-AMI)452 STEMI ++Prospective,open-label, randomized, controlled trials, using a 2 × 2 factorial design, were andomized to: (1) Intracoronary abciximab infusion; (2) No intracoronary abciximab; (3) TA; and (4) No TAExport Medtronic catheterReduction in infarct size (measured by cardiac MRI at 30 days)The intra-coronary Abciximab arm at 30 days showed a reduced infarct size (measured by cardiac MRI) compared to no Abciximab (median 15.1%; IQR: 6.8%-22.7%; n = 181, vs 17.9%; IQR: 10.3%-25.4%; n = 172; P = 0.03). TA vs no TA showed no difference in infarct size at 30 days (median 17.0%; IQR: 9.0%-22.8%; n = 174, vs 17.3%; IQR: 7.1%-25.5%; n = 179; P = 0.51) as well as no mortality difference at 1 year
Vrints et al[8], Kirtane et al[9] (TASTE)7244 STEMI Multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial, Thrombus aspiration + PCI vs PCI aloneMultiple cathetersAll-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary endpoints are recurrent myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, heart failure, and cardiogenic shockDeath from any cause occurred in 2.8% (TA group) vs 3.0% (PCI group) (HR = 0.94; 95%CI: 0.72-1.22; P = 0.63). Routine TA before PCI did not affect 30-day mortality compared to PCI alone[44]. There was no reduction in death from any cause or composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year
Matsuo et al[10], Yaméogo et al[11] (TOTAL)10732 STEMI Multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial comparing routine aspiration thrombectomy + PCI vs PCI aloneExport Medtronic catheterCardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or class IV heart failure at 180 daysPrimary outcome occurred in 6.9% (TA group) vs 7.0% in PCI-only group (HR = 0.99; 95%CI: 0.85-1.15; P = 0.86) with no reduction in CV death, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or heart failure within 180 days. Primary outcome at 1 year occurred in 8% of each group (HR 1.00; 95%CI: 0.87-1.15; P = 0.99). CV death at 1 year was reported as 4% in each group (HR = 0.93; 95%CI: 0.76-1.14; P = 0.48)
Keeley et al[12] (NATURE study)148 STEMI patients till Dec 2014Randomized, multicentre clinical trial: Compare the safety and efficacy of the enVast™ system as an adjunctive measure to conventional intervention vs the standard of care in STEMI patients with significant thrombus burdenEnVast The study aims to determine if the enVast™ device can improve procedural success and long-term outcomes in this patient populationThe enVast™ thrombectomy catheter represents a promising advancement in treating STEMI patients with significant thrombus burdens. These ongoing studies are expected to provide more definitive evidence regarding its role in improving clinical outcomes