BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2025; 13(33): 107990
Published online Nov 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i33.107990
Table 1 Thrombus score classification using coronary angiography
Thrombus grade
Definition
Grade 0No thrombus
Grade 1Possible thrombus
Grade 2Small (greatest dimension ≤ 1/2 VD
Grade 3Moderate (> 1/2 but < 2 VD)
Grade 4Large (≥ 2 VD)
Grade 5Unable to assess TB due to vessel occlusion
Table 2 Landmark studies on thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction
Ref.
Sample size
Design and randomisation
TA catheter type
Primary endpoint
Finding
Byrne et al[1] (REMEDIA)100 STEMIStandard PCI (n = 49) vs Manual TA (n = 50)Diver CE catheterPost-procedure myocardial blush grade ≥ 2, and ST segment resolution ≥ 70%TA improves MBG (≥ 2) and STR (68.0% and 44.9% vs 58.0% and 36.7%, respectively) with OR 2.6 (95%CI: 1.2-5.9; P = 0.020) and OR 2.4 (95%CI: 1.1-5.3; P = 0.034), respectively. Direct stenting was more frequently used in TA than standard PCI groups (66% vs 24%). TA is feasible and improves the angiographic and ECG criteria of myocardial reperfusion compared to PCI alone
Szummer et al[2] (EXPIRA)175 STEMI +Standard PCI (n = 87) vs Manual TA + PCI (n = 88)Export Medtronic catheterPost-procedure myocardial blush grade ≥ 2, and ST segment resolution ≥ 70% at 90 min post-procedureTA improved MBG (≥ 2) and STR (88% vs 60%; P = 0.001; and 64% vs 39%; P = 0.001). The extent of microvascular obstruction defined by contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI was significantly lower in the TA group; TA significantly reduced infarct size at 3 months, and lower cardiac death was observed at 9 months
Rezkalla et al[3], Iwakura et al[4] (TAPAS)1071 STEMIStandard PCI (n = 536), manual TA + PCI (n = 535)Export Medtronic catheterMBG of 0 or 1, indicating poor myocardial perfusionMBG of 0 or 1 was significantly lower in the TA group (17.1%) compared to the conventional PCI group (26.3) (P < 0.001). Complete ST-segment resolution was more frequent in the TA group (56.6% vs 44.2%, P < 0.001), 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the TA group (3.6% vs 6.7%, P = 0.02), one-year mortality was also lower in TA group (3.6% vs 6.7%, P = 0.01)
van Lavieren et al[5], van 't Hof et al[6], Ndrepepa et al[7] (INFUSE-AMI)452 STEMI ++Prospective,open-label, randomized, controlled trials, using a 2 × 2 factorial design, were andomized to: (1) Intracoronary abciximab infusion; (2) No intracoronary abciximab; (3) TA; and (4) No TAExport Medtronic catheterReduction in infarct size (measured by cardiac MRI at 30 days)The intra-coronary Abciximab arm at 30 days showed a reduced infarct size (measured by cardiac MRI) compared to no Abciximab (median 15.1%; IQR: 6.8%-22.7%; n = 181, vs 17.9%; IQR: 10.3%-25.4%; n = 172; P = 0.03). TA vs no TA showed no difference in infarct size at 30 days (median 17.0%; IQR: 9.0%-22.8%; n = 174, vs 17.3%; IQR: 7.1%-25.5%; n = 179; P = 0.51) as well as no mortality difference at 1 year
Vrints et al[8], Kirtane et al[9] (TASTE)7244 STEMI Multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial, Thrombus aspiration + PCI vs PCI aloneMultiple cathetersAll-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary endpoints are recurrent myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, heart failure, and cardiogenic shockDeath from any cause occurred in 2.8% (TA group) vs 3.0% (PCI group) (HR = 0.94; 95%CI: 0.72-1.22; P = 0.63). Routine TA before PCI did not affect 30-day mortality compared to PCI alone[44]. There was no reduction in death from any cause or composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year
Matsuo et al[10], Yaméogo et al[11] (TOTAL)10732 STEMI Multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial comparing routine aspiration thrombectomy + PCI vs PCI aloneExport Medtronic catheterCardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or class IV heart failure at 180 daysPrimary outcome occurred in 6.9% (TA group) vs 7.0% in PCI-only group (HR = 0.99; 95%CI: 0.85-1.15; P = 0.86) with no reduction in CV death, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or heart failure within 180 days. Primary outcome at 1 year occurred in 8% of each group (HR 1.00; 95%CI: 0.87-1.15; P = 0.99). CV death at 1 year was reported as 4% in each group (HR = 0.93; 95%CI: 0.76-1.14; P = 0.48)
Keeley et al[12] (NATURE study)148 STEMI patients till Dec 2014Randomized, multicentre clinical trial: Compare the safety and efficacy of the enVast™ system as an adjunctive measure to conventional intervention vs the standard of care in STEMI patients with significant thrombus burdenEnVast The study aims to determine if the enVast™ device can improve procedural success and long-term outcomes in this patient populationThe enVast™ thrombectomy catheter represents a promising advancement in treating STEMI patients with significant thrombus burdens. These ongoing studies are expected to provide more definitive evidence regarding its role in improving clinical outcomes


Write to the Help Desk