Bhati G, Mongardini FM, Bhati K, Singh P, Bansal R, Bansal A, Mahajan S, Docimo L, Caricato M, Capolupo GT, Carannante F. Ruptured primary intrahepatic ectopic pregnancy: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(6): 118135 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i6.118135]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Filippo Carannante, MD, PhD, Academic Fellow, Additional Professor, FACS, UOC Chirurgia Colorettale, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200 Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma 00128, Italy. f.carannante@unicampus.it
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Case Report
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Gajendra Bhati, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda Punjab, Bathinda 151101, Punjab, India
Federico Maria Mongardini, Department of General, Mininvasive, Oncologic and Obesity Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Naples 80131, Italy
Kamna Bhati, Department of Dietetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda 151001, Punjab, India
Pushpinder Singh, Department of Radiodiagnostic, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda 151001, Punjab, India
Raghav Bansal, Samridhi Mahajan, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda 151001, Punjab, India
Ayush Bansal, Adesh Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Bathinda 151001, India
Ludovico Docimo, Department of Surgery, XI Division of General, Minivasive and Obesity Surgery Master of Coloproctology and Master of Pelvi-Perineal Rehabilitation, Napoli 80100, Napoli, Italy
Marco Caricato, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Filippo Carannante, UOC Chirurgia Colorettale, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma 00128, Italy
Co-corresponding authors: Raghav Bansal and Filippo Carannante.
Author contributions: Bhati G and Bansal R were involved in patient management and surgical treatment; Singh P performed and interpreted the radiological investigations; Mongardini FM, Docimo L, Caricato M, and Capolupo GT provided surgical supervision and critical clinical input; Bhati K, Bansal A, and Mahajan S collected clinical data and performed the literature review; Carannante F conceived and designed the study, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, and approved the final version; All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Bansal R and Carannante F jointly conceptualized and designed the study. Bansal R was primarily responsible for the clinical and surgical aspects of the case, including patient evaluation, diagnostic assessment, surgical decision-making, and intraoperative management. He coordinated the collection of clinical data and was responsible for drafting the case presentation with a focus on the clinical course and surgical findings. In addition, Bansal R conducted a comprehensive review of the literature and contributed substantially to the interpretation of clinical and imaging findings, integrating existing evidence into the discussion section. Carannante F played a leading role in the overall supervision and critical revision of the manuscript. He thoroughly reviewed all sections of the manuscript for scientific accuracy, clinical relevance, and editorial consistency, and supervised the entire revision process. Carannante F ensured alignment with the journal’s requirements, coordinated the response to the editors’ and peer reviewers’ comments, and oversaw the final structure and content of the manuscript prior to submission. Both Bansal R and Carannante F made substantial and indispensable contributions to manuscript preparation, critical revision for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version to be published. They jointly take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole and for all aspects of the study. The complementary clinical, surgical, and academic contributions of Bansal R and Carannante F were essential for the completion of this manuscript. For these reasons, both authors qualify as co-corresponding authors.
Informed consent statement: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016) and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Filippo Carannante, MD, PhD, Academic Fellow, Additional Professor, FACS, UOC Chirurgia Colorettale, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200 Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma 00128, Italy. f.carannante@unicampus.it
Received: December 25, 2025 Revised: December 31, 2025 Accepted: January 22, 2026 Published online: February 26, 2026 Processing time: 50 Days and 8.8 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Primary hepatic ectopic pregnancy is an exceptionally rare subtype of abdominal ectopic pregnancy and carries a very high risk of catastrophic hemorrhage. Due to its atypical clinical presentation and unusual implantation site, diagnosis is often delayed, leading to significant maternal morbidity and mortality.
CASE SUMMARY
A woman of reproductive age presented with acute upper abdominal pain and hemorrhagic shock. Pregnancy testing was positive, and transabdominal ultrasonography revealed massive hemoperitoneum with the absence of intrauterine gestation. Focused abdominal ultrasound demonstrated a heterogeneous lesion arising from the right hepatic lobe, suspicious for ruptured intrahepatic ectopic pregnancy. Initially, a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed but due to hypotension and anesthetist advice, emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed, and a ruptured intrahepatic gestational mass was identified. Complete surgical excision with hemostasis was achieved. Histopathology confirmed intrahepatic ectopic pregnancy. The postoperative course was uneventful.
CONCLUSION
Prompt recognition, appropriate imaging sequence, and emergency surgical intervention are essential to prevent maternal mortality in hepatic ectopic pregnancy.
Core Tip: Primary hepatic ectopic pregnancy is an extremely rare but life-threatening condition. In pregnant patients presenting with acute abdomen and hemoperitoneum without intrauterine gestation, hepatic implantation must be considered. Early imaging and immediate surgical management are crucial to prevent fatal hemorrhaging.
Citation: Bhati G, Mongardini FM, Bhati K, Singh P, Bansal R, Bansal A, Mahajan S, Docimo L, Caricato M, Capolupo GT, Carannante F. Ruptured primary intrahepatic ectopic pregnancy: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(6): 118135
Ectopic pregnancy occurs in approximately 1%-2% of all pregnancies with abdominal ectopic pregnancy accounting for nearly 1% of ectopic cases[1,2]. Primary abdominal ectopic pregnancy is defined by direct implantation on a peritoneal surface[3,4] as described by Studdiford’s criteria[5]. Among abdominal implantations, hepatic ectopic pregnancy represents one of the rarest and most dangerous forms due to the extensive vascularity of the liver and the associated risk of massive hemorrhage[2-4].
CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints
Acute onset of severe upper abdominal pain associated with dizziness and syncope.
History of present illness
The patient developed sudden epigastric and right upper quadrant pain a few hours before admission that was associated with nausea, vomiting, and presyncope. The pain progressively worsened and was not preceded by trauma. There was recent amenorrhea and no vaginal bleeding. At the time of presentation, the patient was not aware of being pregnant and reported no previous symptoms suggestive of pregnancy.
History of past illness
No previous ectopic pregnancy, pelvic inflammatory disease, assisted reproductive techniques, or abdominal surgery were reported
Personal and family history
No previous diseases were reported.
Physical examination
The patient appeared pale and diaphoretic. Her blood pressure was low with tachycardia, consistent with hemorrhagic shock. Abdominal examination revealed diffuse tenderness with guarding that was more pronounced in the upper abdomen.
Laboratory examinations
Hemoglobin was 6.9 g/dL. Serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin level was 43760 IU/mL (Table 1).
Urgent abdominal ultrasonography was performed as the first-line imaging modality in the emergency setting. Ultrasound examination revealed a large volume of free intraperitoneal fluid, consistent with massive hemoperitoneum, and the absence of intrauterine gestation. Transvaginal ultrasonography confirmed the absence of intrauterine pregnancy and demonstrated normal adnexal structures.
Focused abdominal ultrasonography further identified a heterogeneous, irregular lesion with mixed echogenicity arising from the right hepatic lobe that was associated with surrounding free fluid, suggestive of an actively bleeding hepatic source (Figure 1). Based on the ultrasonographic findings and the patient’s hemodynamic instability, a diagnosis of ruptured intrahepatic ectopic pregnancy was suspected[6,7].
Figure 1 Abdominal ultrasound.
A: Ultrasound imaging demonstrated a large volume of free intraperitoneal fluid that was consistent with massive hemoperitoneum; B: Live ectopic pregnancy with positive fetal heart rate. Doppler study showed intracardiac color flow; C: Focused abdominal ultrasonography of the liver. Ultrasound imaging showed a heterogeneous lesion with mixed echogenicity arising from the right hepatic lobe that was suspicious of ectopic gestational implantation.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS
Ruptured primary intrahepatic ectopic pregnancy.
TREATMENT
Initially, a diagnostic laproscopy was performed but due to hypotension and anesthetist advice emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed. A ruptured gestational mass embedded within the right hepatic lobe was identified as the source of active bleeding (Figures 2 and 3). Complete excision of the ectopic tissue and meticulous hemostasis were achieved.
Figure 2 Intraoperative findings during diagnostic laparoscopy.
Intraoperative view of active bleeding from a ruptured gestational mass embedded within the hepatic parenchyma (arrows).
Figure 4 Histopathological examination.
Microscopic image of chorionic villi embedded within the hepatic tissue, confirming the diagnosis of intrahepatic ectopic pregnancy (hematoxylin and eosin staining, × 100).
Primary intrahepatic ectopic pregnancy is an exceptionally rare form of abdominal ectopic gestation and is associated with a very high risk of life-threatening hemorrhage[1,2]. Abdominal ectopic pregnancies account for approximately 1% of all ectopic pregnancies, and hepatic implantation represents one of the least frequent and most dangerous sites described in the literature[1,3]. To date, fewer than 50 cases of hepatic ectopic pregnancy have been reported worldwide. Most of them present as surgical emergencies due to rupture and massive hemoperitoneum[2,4,5].
The clinical presentation is often nonspecific and may mimic other causes of acute abdomen, including hepatobiliary disorders or spontaneous intra-abdominal bleeding[6]. For this reason, diagnosis is frequently delayed. In emergency settings ultrasonography represents the first-line imaging modality and often the only immediately available diagnostic tool, particularly in patients who are hemodynamically unstable[7]. As reported in several published cases, transabdominal ultrasound is usually sufficient to demonstrate free intraperitoneal fluid, exclude intrauterine pregnancy, and suggest an extrauterine source of bleeding[8,9]. In the present case ultrasonography revealed massive hemoperitoneum together with a heterogeneous lesion arising from the right hepatic lobe. These findings are consistent with previously described sonographic features of hepatic ectopic pregnancy[10,11].
A critical point that deserves clear explanation for readers concerns the mechanism by which the gestational sac becomes implanted in the liver. Although the exact pathogenesis remains uncertain, several hypotheses have been proposed in the literature. The most widely accepted theory suggests primary peritoneal implantation of the fertilized ovum, followed by trophoblastic invasion of the hepatic surface[12,13]. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, the liver, particularly the right lobe, may represent a permissive site for implantation because of its large surface area, relatively fixed position, and rich vascular supply that can support early trophoblastic development[14,15].
An alternative mechanism involves secondary implantation after early tubal abortion whereby the conceptus detaches from the fallopian tube and subsequently reimplants on the hepatic capsule or subcapsular parenchyma[16]. However, many reported cases[17,18], including the present one, describe normal adnexa and fallopian tubes at surgical exploration, fulfilling Studdiford’s criteria for primary abdominal ectopic pregnancy[19,20]. These findings favor the hypothesis of true primary hepatic implantation rather than secondary reimplantation (Table 3)[21-30].
Table 3 Literature review of all cases of primary hepatic pregnancy from the last 10 years.
Vaginal bleeding with no abdominal pain and 14-week pregnancy
β-hCG: 135755.00 IU/L, USG abdomen revealed a live 14-week fetus attached to the undersurface of the left hepatic lobe. CT scan showed a 7 cm fetus between left liver lobe and gall bladder
Laparoscopy excision and extraction of the amniotic sac as well as a 12-cm long fetus
β-hCG: 8707 IU/mL, USG abdomen revealed a mixed echogenic mass in the hepatic area. CT scan showed hemoperitoneum and a round 25-mm lesion in the VI hepatic segment
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach with visualization of the ectopic tissue in segment VI, subsequent excision of the foci and hemostasis were achieved with 3800 mL intraoperative blood loss
Inconclusive initial diagnostic laparoscopy leading to re-exploration and additional surgery
β-hCG: 2244 IU/mL, MRI abdomen showed a quasicircular high signal inside with a diameter of 20 mm near the right lobe of the liver close to the diaphragm
Laparoscopic removal of the blood clots and electrocoagulation of the bleeding site near segment VI and diaphragm. Final diagnosis of the patient was diaphragmatic adhesion secondary to liver ectopic pregnancy loss
History of one previous induced abortion following pregnancy achieved through assisted reproductive technique
Severe dull pain in right hypochondrium with multiple episodes of vomiting and amenorrhea for 3 months
β-hCG: 168100 IU/mL, USG abdomen revealed a single, smoothly contoured gestational sac in the right hepatic lobe, containing a fetus with FHR+. The gestational age, based on crown-rump length, was measured at 5.75 cm, corresponding to 12 weeks
Wedge segmental resection of segment VI, Pringle maneuver and hepatic packing for hemostasis
β-hCG: 18336 IU/mL, USG abdomen showed a hyperechoic lesion with echogenic components suspicious of an ectopic pregnancy with a fetal pole but absent FHR
A small segment of the liver along with the ectopic foci were excised
β-hCG: 55710 mUI/mL, USG abdomen revealed presence of rounded image with defined contours in the right hepatic lobe, containing a fetus of 13 weeks, movements+ and FHR+
Exploratory laparotomy with hepatic wedge resection and Pringle maneuver and hepatic packing for hemostasis
From an imaging standpoint ultrasonography can indirectly support these pathogenetic considerations. The demonstration of an extrauterine gestational lesion closely related to the hepatic surface, together with the absence of adnexal pathology, supports the concept of primary abdominal implantation[10,18]. Moreover, the identification of a heterogeneous or mixed echogenic hepatic lesion associated with hemoperitoneum should raise suspicion of hepatic ectopic pregnancy, especially in pregnant patients presenting with acute upper abdominal pain and signs of hemorrhagic shock[9,11].
Management strategies reported in the literature largely depend on the patient’s hemodynamic status. Conservative treatment with systemic methotrexate has been described in selected stable cases, but this approach carries a significant risk of delayed rupture and hemorrhage[19]. Consequently, emergency surgical intervention remains the treatment of choice in ruptured hepatic ectopic pregnancy as delayed diagnosis and treatment are associated with high maternal mortality rates[20]. The present case highlighted the importance of rapid ultrasound-based assessment followed by prompt surgical exploration to achieve a favorable outcome.
Strengths and limitations
The main strength of this case report was the description of an exceptionally rare and life-threatening condition supported by ultrasonographic findings, intraoperative confirmation, and histopathological diagnosis, together with a focused review of the available literature. The main limitation was the single-case nature of the report that is inherent to the extreme rarity of hepatic ectopic pregnancy and limits the generalizability of the conclusions.
CONCLUSION
Primary hepatic ectopic pregnancy is a rare but potentially fatal cause of acute abdomen. Early recognition, appropriate imaging sequencing, and prompt surgical management are essential to improve maternal outcomes.
Footnotes
Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Surgery
Country of origin: India
Peer-review report’s classification
Scientific Quality: Grade C, Grade D
Novelty: Grade C, Grade D
Creativity or Innovation: Grade C, Grade D
Scientific Significance: Grade D, Grade D
P-Reviewer: Giorgio A, MD, Chief Physician, Professor, Italy S-Editor: Liu JH L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Xu J
Atrash HK, Friede A, Hogue CJ. Abdominal pregnancy in the United States: frequency and maternal mortality.Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:333-337.
[PubMed] [DOI]
Dubinsky TJ, Guerra F, Gormaz G, Maklad N. Fetal survival in abdominal pregnancy: a review of 11 cases.J Clin Ultrasound. 1996;24:513-517.
[PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text]
Opare-Addo HS, Deganus S. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: a study of 13 consecutive cases seen in 1993 and 1994 at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.Afr J Reprod Health. 2000;4:28-39.
[PubMed] [DOI]
He S, Cheng Y, Zhang G, Qi H, Sun Q. Primary hepatic pregnancy: a case report with a history of cesarean section and oral contraceptives, with review of literature.Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019;12:4344-4348.
[PubMed] [DOI]