Published online Dec 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i36.115269
Revised: October 27, 2025
Accepted: December 10, 2025
Published online: December 26, 2025
Processing time: 73 Days and 18 Hours
The influence of obesity on the recovery of patients after laparoscopic surgery is multi-faceted and complex, presenting both challenges and advantages brought by laparoscopic technology. This study assessed clinicopathologic differences and 1-year outcomes following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with obesity and gallstone disease. Generally, obesity increases the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery and the risk of postoperative complications, thereby having a negative impact on the recovery process. However, compared with traditional open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has greatly reduced the surgical trauma and promoted their postoperative recovery. Despite these preoperative differences, obesity did not adversely affect short-term surgical outcomes after elective LC. However, LC can reduce incision-related complications in obese patients and help lower the risk of pulmonary complications. Patients can move around earlier, which is crucial for preventing thrombosis. Laparoscopic surgery has brought more recovery advantages to obese patients. Through meticulous preoperative assessment, precise intraoperative operation and good postoperative mana
Core Tip: Laparoscopic surgery is significantly superior to open surgery in terms of safety, efficacy, and recovery, making it well-suited to the physiological characteristics of obese patients. Although it demands greater technical skill, it offers the better benefits to this patient population.
- Citation: Huang K. Influence of obesity on the patient’s recovery after laparoscopic surgery. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(36): 115269
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v13/i36/115269.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i36.115269
The number of patients with obesity is rising worldwide. Obesity affects laparoscopic surgery in multiple ways thr
Some obese patients have impaired cardiopulmonary function and metabolic status, and some also present with com
After reading the article published by Noh et al[3], I wish to include the following comments in this editorial. When performing LC in obese patients, fat accumulation often makes exposure of the Calot’s triangle more difficult and complicates grasping and retracting the gallbladder. Challenges in exposure, unclear anatomy, and additional hemostasis steps often prolong the operation compared to non-obese patients. Abd El Maksoud et al[4] have reported that obesity significantly increases the technical difficulty of LC. Despite these issues, LC remains a safe and preferred approach for obese patients. Key factors for successful surgery include thorough preoperative imaging evaluation, optimization of the patient’s physical condition, adjustment of trocar placement according to individual anatomy, development of a sound surgical plan, enhanced wound care, and encouragement of early ambulation after surgery.
Following LC, obese patients may experience mild fat malabsorption in the early stages. However, within one to two months of recovery, most patients return to normal, and gastrointestinal function gradually improves[5]. Postoperative weight changes in obese patients depend on appetite, dietary intake, physical activity, and eating habits[6]. Overall, differences in postoperative weight change are not significant among obese patients, but their quality of life improves markedly. This is why we still recommend LC as the first-line treatment for obese patients with gallstones.
In summary, laparoscopic surgery provides significant recovery advantages for obese patients. Through careful pre
| 1. | Endo Y, Takayama H, Orimoto H, Nakamura S, Miyoshino W, Nagasawa Y, Kawano Y, Masuda T, Hirashita T, Inomata M. Role of Anatomical Structure Recognition in Enhancing the Safety and Efficiency of Initial Optical Trocar Insertion in Patients with Obesity Who Underwent Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2025;35:2609-2615. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 2. | Dickerson RN, Andromalos L, Brown JC, Correia MITD, Pritts W, Ridley EJ, Robinson KN, Rosenthal MD, van Zanten ARH. Obesity and critical care nutrition: current practice gaps and directions for future research. Crit Care. 2022;26:283. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 28] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 3. | Noh BG, Seo HI, Park YM, Oh MH, Song SB. Clinicopathologic differences before and after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy according to obesity. World J Clin Cases. 2025;13:110391. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 4. | Abd El Maksoud WM, Abbas KS, Al Amri FS, Alzahrani HA, Dalboh A, Alshandeer MH, Alghamdi MA, Yahya FH, Bawahab AM, Fayed HM, Bosaily AJM, Bawahab MA. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Morbid Obesity. J Clin Med. 2025;14:4108. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 5. | Chen J, Liu ZT, Lyu JT, Jiang GP. Impact of metabolic disorders on gallstone disease and perioperative recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2024;23:604-612. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 6. | Paone E, Pierro L, Damico A, Aceto P, Campanile FC, Silecchia G, Lai C. Alexithymia and weight loss in obese patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Eat Weight Disord. 2019;24:129-134. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in RCA: 15] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
