Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4388
Peer-review started: May 10, 2020
First decision: June 7, 2020
Revised: June 20, 2020
Accepted: August 22, 2020
Article in press: August 22, 2020
Published online: October 6, 2020
Processing time: 140 Days and 13.5 Hours
In the clinic, the incidence of Lisfranc injury is not high but the rate of missed diagnosis is high, especially for occult and atypical injuries. The definition, diagnosis and treatment criteria of such injuries remain controversial.
A new concept "atypical Lisfranc joint complex injury" is introduced in this study.
We hope that the introduction of such a new concept can prompt clinicians to pay attention to such injuries and that this study can make some contributions to further standardize the diagnosis and treatment of this type of injury.
This study used computed tomography and stress tests to diagnose and evaluate atypical Lisfranc joint complex injury, and active open reduction and internal fixation were performed to evaluate patients with joint instability.
In this retrospective analysis of 18 cases with atypical Lisfranc joint complex injury, the rate of excellent and good treatment reached 88.9%.
In this study, a new classification method was used to study the case data which proved that the classification method has good clinical utility for such injuries. From this study, it is concluded that atypical Lisfranc joint complex injury is newly defined and included in Lisfranc injuries, but the classification, surgical indications and treatment strategies for this type of injury require further study. The number of columns involved in the Lisfranc joint complex injury was related to the degree of violence, but the prognosis of the injury was not necessarily directly related to the severity of the injury.
Combining these results with those of other studies, we believe that anatomical reduction and stable fixation are the key factors in determining prognosis.