Published online Oct 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i30.9228
Peer-review started: May 26, 2021
First decision: July 15, 2021
Revised: July 17, 2021
Accepted: September 8, 2021
Article in press: September 8, 2021
Published online: October 26, 2021
Processing time: 147 Days and 21.1 Hours
Monteggia and equivalent lesions are relatively rare but result in severe injuries in childhood, typically affecting children between 4 and 10 years old. The diagnosis and treatment of an equivalent Monteggia lesion is more complicated than those of a typical Monteggia fracture. This type of lesion may be challenging and may lead to serious complications if not treated properly. Pediatric Monteggia equivalent type I lesions have been reported in a few reports, all of which the patients were all over 4 years old.
A 14-mo-old boy was referred to our clinic after falling from his bed 10 d prior. With regard to the clinical examination, an obvious swollen and angular deformity was noted on his right forearm. Plain radiographs and reconstructed computed tomography scans showed a Monteggia type I fracture and dislocation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed a type I Monteggia equivalent lesion consisting of ulnar fracture and Salter-Harris type I injury in the proximal radius. The radial head was still in the joint, and only the radial metaphysis was displaced anteriorly. Open reduction and pinning of both displaced radial and ulnar fractures achieved an excellent result with full function.
We recommend MRI examination or arthrography during reduction, especially if the secondary ossification center has not appeared.
Core Tip: We reviewed a case of Monteggia type I equivalent fracture in a 14-mo-old child. This is the youngest patient to suffer from this injury. For patients aged less than 5 years, plain radiograph and reconstructed computed tomography scans cannot distinguish Monteggia fractures and Monteggia equivalent fractures in patients with unossified radial heads. As a result, fractures may be misdiagnosed or neglected, leading to poor clinical and radiographic results. Therefore, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be routinely performed. We recommended MRI examination or arthrography during reduction if cartilage fracture is suspected, especially if the secondary ossification center has not appeared.