Published online Mar 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i3.310
Peer-review started: October 24, 2014
First decision: December 12, 2014
Revised: January 1, 2015
Accepted: January 15, 2015
Article in press: January 19, 2015
Published online: March 16, 2015
Processing time: 140 Days and 18.1 Hours
AIM: To present the United Kingdom’s first case series of 70 otological cases of endoscopic and non-endoscopic ear surgeries.
METHODS: Prospective case series incorporating a range of endoscopic procedures performed using a 4 mm, 18 cm rigid endoscope, performed by a single surgeon at a single centre. Primary outcome measures included mean average pre and post-operative air-bone gap hearing thresholds and duration of surgery.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent endoscopic assisted ear surgery and 32 underwent non-endoscopic assisted ear surgery. In both surgical groups, there was a significant difference between pre and post-operative mean air-bone gaps (P = 0.02). Mean operating time was comparable between both groups. Eight patients developed post-operative complications.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ear surgery can be performed safely in a range of otological procedures. This has the potential to become a well-established surgical option for middle ear surgery in the near future. Advantages and limitations are discussed.
Core tip: The role of endoscopic ear surgery is yet to be properly established but as more otologists adopt this technique, its role will become much more clearly defined and may lead to widespread use based upon positive outcomes for surgery. As with every new surgical technique, a learning curve must first be overcome before reliable conclusions can be drawn about its use. Our series has shown the benefits of using this technique in limited cholesteatoma disease and in providing a good view during revision mastoid surgery with simple pathology.