Cognitive intervention based on Positive Emotion-Engagement Relationship-Meaning-Achievement theory in patients with depression and insomnia: Application value

Figure 1 Comparison of depression levels among patients. ^aP < 0.05 vs pre-intervention; ^bP < 0.05 vs control group. A: Comparison of 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale scores among patients; B: Comparison of Self-rating Depression Scale scores among patients. HAMD-17: 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale; SDS: Self-rating Depression Scale.

Figure 2 Comparison of patient sleep quality. ^aP < 0.05 vs pre-intervention; ^bP < 0.05 vs control group. A: Comparison of patient sleep quality scores; B: Comparison of patient sleep time scores; C: Comparison of patient sleep disorder scores; D: Comparison of patient hypnotic drug scores; E: Comparison of daytime functional impairment scores among patients; F: Comparison of patient sleep time scores; G: Comparison of patient sleep efficiency scores; H: Comparison of total Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores among patients.

Figure 3 Comparison of Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status scores among patients. ^aP < 0.05 vs pre-intervention; ^bP < 0.05 vs control group. RBANS: Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.

Figure 4 Comparison of Chinese version of Personal and Social Functioning Scale total scores among patients. ^aP < 0.05 vs pre-intervention; ^bP < 0.05 vs control group. PSP-CHN: Chinese version of Personal and Social Functioning Scale.

Figure 5 Comparison of patient quality of life. ^aP < 0.05 vs pre-intervention; ^bP < 0.05 vs control group. A: Comparison of total scores of patient quality of life; B: Comparison of physiological field of patients; C: Comparison of patient psychological scores; D: Comparison of patient social relationship evaluations; E: Comparison of scores in the field of patient environment.