Published online Aug 19, 2021. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i8.477
Peer-review started: February 16, 2021
First decision: March 16, 2021
Revised: March 24, 2021
Accepted: July 20, 2021
Article in press: July 20, 2021
Published online: August 19, 2021
Processing time: 176 Days and 13 Hours
One of the most innovative and most investigated non-invasive brain stimulation techniques is Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). This device has received Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of various neurological (headache) and psychiatric (treatment resistant depression) disorders. Several studies have been conducted to find new applications of TMS in conditions that do not respond or partially respond to standard psychopharmacological therapies.
TMS is an increasingly used technique in the neurological and psychiatric fields. One of the greatest concerns about its use is the possibility of developing severe side effects such as hypomanic/manic switches (HMS).
The aim of this meta-analysis is to quantify the risk of developing HMS after treatment with TMS in mood disorders and to evaluate the drop-out rate due to that adverse event.
The search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases on March 22, 2020. All procedures were registered on PROSPERO and performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Only double blind/single blind articles, written in English were included. RevMan 5.4 Software for Windows was used to perform the meta-analysis.
Of the 25 eligible studies, only four HMSs were described. No dropouts were reported due to symptoms severity.
Our data confirm that, by applying appropriate psychopharmacological and anamnestic precautions, TMS is a safe technique for treating mood disorders.
Greater uniformity of protocols, their online registration and the timely reporting of side effects on scientific papers could guarantee a more accurate analysis of the health risks induced by TMS in future meta-analyses.
