Published online May 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i5.114710
Revised: December 2, 2025
Accepted: January 7, 2026
Published online: May 19, 2026
Processing time: 215 Days and 11.2 Hours
Dysfunctional sleep beliefs and chronotype together influence student sleep health and academic performance. Altınöz et al, published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Psychiatry, provided evidence that maladaptive sleep beliefs undermine academic achievement indirectly through reduced sleep quality, with evening-type students showing the highest vulnerability. Based on these findings, this commentary highlights a cognitive-circadian interaction model, where negative sleep cognitions intensify the mismatch between biological rhythms and institutional schedules. Morning-type students benefit from better alignment, whereas evening-types face compounded risk from distorted beliefs and circadian conflict. We further discuss the methodological strengths and limitations of the original study and propose future directions focused on longitudinal validation, objective sleep assessments, and chronotype-sensitive interventions. Targeting dysfunctional sleep beliefs through behavioral strategies and more flexible aca
Core Tip: Altınöz et al identified that dysfunctional sleep beliefs affect academic performance indirectly through impaired sleep quality, with evening-type students being particularly vulnerable. This commentary underscores the novelty of incorporating cognitive distortions into chronobiological models of student achievement and emphasizes that interventions should target modifiable beliefs and sleep quality. Future research should employ longitudinal and multi-method designs, while educational policy reforms should integrate chronotype-sensitive scheduling and cognitive-behavioral strategies to enhance both sleep health and academic success in high-pressure learning environments.