BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Crit Care Med. Dec 9, 2025; 14(4): 107396
Published online Dec 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i4.107396
Safety and early mobilization in intensive care unit patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Syed A Khan, Abdul Moeed, Tahreem Mari, Zehra Yousuf, Arthur Hanson, Yue Dong, Patrick Cornelius, Humayun Anjum, Iqbal Ratnani, Salim Surani
Syed A Khan, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, MN 56001, United States
Abdul Moeed, Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
Tahreem Mari, Department of Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
Zehra Yousuf, Department of Medicine, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN 38112, United States
Arthur Hanson, Department of Medicine, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, United States
Yue Dong, Department of Anesthesiology and Periopertive Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, United States
Patrick Cornelius, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
Humayun Anjum, Department of Medicine, Baylor Scott and White, Grapevine, TX 76051, United States
Iqbal Ratnani, Department of Anesthesiology, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas 77030, United States
Salim Surani, Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, Texas AM University, College Station, TX 77843, United States
Salim Surani, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
Author contributions: Khan SA, Moeed A, and Mari T contributed to conceptualization, methodology, writing–original draft, formal analysis, writing–review and editing; Mari T, Yousuf Z, and Hanson A contributed to investigation, data curation, software, data analysis, writing–review and editing; Surani S contributed to project administration, funding acquisition, writing–review and editing; Dong Y and Cornelius P contributed to supervision, writing–review and editing; Anjum H, Ratnani I, and Surani S contributed to validation, writing–review and editing.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Salim Surani, MD, Professor, Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, Texas AM University, 40 Bizzell Street, College Station, TX 77843, United States. srsurani@hotmail.com
Received: March 24, 2025
Revised: April 17, 2025
Accepted: May 27, 2025
Published online: December 9, 2025
Processing time: 251 Days and 11.1 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Prolonged immobility during intensive care unit (ICU) admission has been a cause of muscle atrophy and worsening functional outcomes with longer recovery times. Prior research has demonstrated that mobilization within a week of ICU admission potentially benefits physical function in critically ill patients.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of initiating mobilization within 72 hours of ICU admission in critically ill patients through an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed through MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from inception until September 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early mobilization (EM) with usual or conventional care in critically ill adult patients. Primary outcomes included length of ICU (days) and ventilation duration (days). Secondary outcomes included muscle strength, functional status, adverse events, all-cause mortality, and quality of life (QOL). A random effects meta-analysis was performed for pooled effect estimates and to derive risk ratios (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Out of 3487 results, 16 RCTs were included with a population of 2385 patients (1195 receiving EM and 1190 with usual care.) A significant reduction in the length of ICU stays [mean difference (MD) = -1.02, 95%CI: -1.96 to -0.09; P = 0.03; I2 = 60%] and ventilation duration (MD = -1.07, 95%CI: -1.91 to -0.23, P = 0.01; I2 = 57%) was observed in the EM group compared to usual care. EM significantly improved muscle strength [standard MD (SMD) = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.18-0.75, P = 0.001; I2 = 79%] and functional status (SMD = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.40-1.00, P < 0.00001; I2 = 81%) in ICU patients. No statistically significant difference was observed in adverse events (RR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.01-2.94, P = 0.05; I2 = 31%), all-cause mortality (RR = 1.10, 95%CI: 0.79-1.53, P = 0.57; I2 = 30%), and QOL (SMD = 0.04, 95%CI: -0.07-0.15, P = 0.50; I2 = 9%) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Initiating mobilization within 72 hours of ICU admission is associated with improved functional outcomes and reduced ICU length of stay and ventilation duration. These findings indicate that EM may be a safe option for ICU patients, contributing to lower recovery times and healthcare costs. Further extensive research is required to validate the long-term effects on survival and QOL.

Keywords: Early mobilization; Early mobility; Intensive care unit; Critical care unit; Mechanical ventilation; Functional outcomes; Randomized controlled trials; Rehabilitation

Core Tip: This updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials involving 2385 intensive care unit (ICU) patients demonstrates that initiating early mobilization (EM) (within 72 hours of ICU admission) significantly reduces ICU length of stay and mechanical ventilation duration while improving muscle strength and functional status. EM does not increase adverse events or mortality, supporting its safety and efficacy as a routine ICU intervention.