Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 24, 2025; 16(12): 110351
Published online Dec 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i12.110351
Published online Dec 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i12.110351
Table 1 Incidence, key studies, and risk factors of hyperprogressive disease
| Ref. | Cancer type | HPD incidence | Proposed risk factors |
| Ferrara et al[16], 2018 | NSCLC | 13.8%-26% | EGFR mutation, LDH > 250 U/L, liver metastasis, ≥ 2 metastatic sites |
| Lo Russo et al[14], 2020 | |||
| Economopoulou et al[17], 2021 | HNSCC | 15.4% | 11q13 chromosomal amplification (CCND1/FGF3), local recurrence |
| Kim et al[18], 2022 | GC | 9.2%-29.4% | EGFR/FGF4, MDM2 amplification, liver metastasis, high tumor burden, advanced age |
| Aoki et al[19], 2024 | |||
| Hwang et al[22], 2020 | Urothelial carcinoma | 6.4%-8% | Elevated baseline NLR, high LDH levels |
| Abbas et al[10], 2019 | |||
| Yamada et al[13], 2018 | Melanoma | 6%-42% | Advanced age, elevated baseline inflammatory markers (CRP/NLR) |
| Zhou et al[20], 2025 | |||
| Şen et al[21], 2024 | Bladder cancer | 12.9% | Elevated baseline NLR, advanced age |
| Renal cell carcinoma | 4.8% |
Table 2 Key regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in hyperprogressive disease
| Regulatory factor | Core mechanism | Clinical significance | Potential intervention strategies |
| Treg cells | Abnormal activation post PD-1 blockade; inhibits APC function via CTLA-4/CD80/CD86; secretes IL-10/TGF-β to suppress effector T cells | Significant Treg infiltration in HPD patients, negatively correlated with treatment efficacy | Target CTLA-4 or deplete Tregs (e.g., anti-CCR4 antibodies) |
| M2-type TAM | Fc receptor-mediated pro-tumor phenotype conversion by anti-PD-1; recruited via CCR2/CCL2 and maintained by CSF-1R signaling | Forms synergistic network with Tregs/MDSCs to drive HPD | Combine CSF-1R inhibitors with PD-1 blockade (e.g., pexidartinib) |
| MDSC | Suppresses T cell function via IDO/VEGF/MMP9; promotes angiogenesis | High MDSC levels predict poor ICI response and HPD risk | Target CXCR2 or arginine metabolism (e.g., CB-1158) |
| T cell exhaustion | Compensatory upregulation of TIM-3/CTLA-4 post PD-1 blockade, leading to “secondary exhaustion” | Enriched in HPD patients with lost anti-tumor function | Multi-checkpoint targeting (e.g., anti-TIM-3 + anti-PD-1) |
| CAF | Upregulates PD-L1 via IL-6/STAT3; recruits Tregs via CXCL12; promotes M2-TAM differentiation | Promotes immunosuppressive microenvironment, positively correlated with HPD progression | Target TGF-β signaling (e.g., galunisertib) or CAF reprogramming |
| Inflammatory dysregulation | IL-10 inhibits CD28 signaling; IFN-γ induces PD-L1 upregulation; IL-6/TNF-α activate STAT3/NF-κB to promote proliferation | Cytokine profile predicts HPD risk | JAK inhibitors (e.g., ruxolitinib) or IL-6R blockade (tocilizumab) |
| Metabolic reprogramming | Tregs utilize lactate/OXPHOS for survival; CD36 mediates fatty acid metabolism adaptation | Metabolic competition exacerbates T cell dysfunction | Lactate dehydrogenase inhibitors or CD36 blockade |
| Genetic alterations | MDM2/MDM4 amplification (p53 degradation); EGFR activation (PD-L1 modification); DNMT3A mutations (epigenetic dysregulation) | 11-gene mutation signature significantly associated with HPD | MDM2 inhibitors (e.g., idasanutlin) or EGFR-TKI combination therapy |
- Citation: Zhang XM, Zhao FY, Gao LF, Xu T, Yang F, Qian NS. Immune therapy-related hyperprogressive disease: Molecular mechanisms, biomarkers, and clinical strategies. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(12): 110351
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i12/110351.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i12.110351
