Kouroglou E, Tsiama V, Stroumpouli E, Savvidis C, Kallistrou E, Ragia D, Motsiou D, Proikaki S, Belis K, Ilias I. Evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas: Current approaches, caveats, and unexplored issues. World J Radiol 2026; 18(4): 119833 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i4.119833]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ioannis Ilias, MD, PhD, Department of Endocrinology, Hippocration General Hospital, No. 63 Evrou Street, Athens GR-11527, Greece. iiliasmd@yahoo.com
Research Domain of This Article
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Apr 28, 2026 (publication date) through Apr 24, 2026
Times Cited of This Article
Times Cited (0)
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Radiology
ISSN
1949-8470
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Kouroglou E, Tsiama V, Stroumpouli E, Savvidis C, Kallistrou E, Ragia D, Motsiou D, Proikaki S, Belis K, Ilias I. Evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas: Current approaches, caveats, and unexplored issues. World J Radiol 2026; 18(4): 119833 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i4.119833]
Eleni Kouroglou, Vasiliki Tsiama, Christos Savvidis, Efthymia Kallistrou, Dimitra Ragia, Dimitra Motsiou, Stella Proikaki, Konstantinos Belis, Ioannis Ilias, Department of Endocrinology, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens GR-11527, Greece
Evaggelia Stroumpouli, Department of Radiology, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens GR-11527, Greece
Author contributions: Kouroglou E, Tsiama V, Stroumpouli E, Savvidis C, Kallistrou E, Ragia D, Motsiou D, Proikaki S, Belis K, and Ilias I searched the literature and drafted this work. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Ioannis Ilias, MD, PhD, Department of Endocrinology, Hippocration General Hospital, No. 63 Evrou Street, Athens GR-11527, Greece. iiliasmd@yahoo.com
Received: February 7, 2026 Revised: March 3, 2026 Accepted: April 8, 2026 Published online: April 28, 2026 Processing time: 76 Days and 14.7 Hours
Abstract
The widespread use of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging over the past two decades has resulted in a marked increase - estimated at nearly ten-fold - in the incidental detection of adrenal masses greater than 1 cm, commonly termed adrenal incidentalomas (ADIs). A fundamental principle in their evaluation is the distinction between “true ADIs” - identified in patients without a history of malignancy or clinical suspicion of adrenal disease - and adrenal lesions detected during oncologic staging. This distinction is critical because the pre-test probability of malignancy differs substantially between these groups. In patients undergoing cancer staging, approximately half of adrenal masses may represent metastatic disease, whereas in true ADI populations, the risk of malignancy is typically below 1%. Failure to differentiate these populations risks inappropriate extrapolation of benign-prevalence data into high-risk oncologic contexts. The evaluation of an ADI has two primary objectives: Exclusion of malignancy and identification of hormonal hypersecretion. Although most ADIs are benign and nonfunctional, biochemical screening remains mandatory in most patients, except in those with limited life expectancy or critical illness. Mild autonomous cortisol secretion is the most prevalent functional abnormality, affecting 20% to 50% of patients, and is associated with increased cardiovascular, metabolic, and osseous morbidity. Cardiovascular event rates of 15.5% over approximately 50-60 months have been reported in affected populations. Radiological paradigms are evolving. A homogeneous lesion with attenuation ≤ 10 Hounsfield units on non-contrast computed tomography remains highly specific for a benign lipid-rich adenoma and, according to current European Society of Endocrinology guidance, requires no further imaging follow-up irrespective of size. Emerging evidence, however, suggests that in true ADIs < 4 cm, expanding the benignity threshold to ≤ 20 Hounsfield units may maintain a positive predictive value of 99.4%-99.8% while reducing unnecessary follow-up imaging. Conversely, the historical reliance on adrenal washout computed tomography is increasingly questioned due to limitations in excluding pheochromocytoma and concerns regarding cost-effectiveness. Future research priorities include prospective validation of expanded radiological thresholds, rigorous cost-effectiveness analyses, systematic assessment of psychiatric and quality-of-life outcomes, and evaluation of proposed etiological hypotheses.
Core Tip: Incidental adrenal masses are increasingly identified through modern imaging, and physicians must differentiate benign from malignant lesions while excluding hormonal hypersecretion. Mild autonomous cortisol secretion is common and carries cardiometabolic/skeletal risks, warranting biochemical evaluation. Current evidence supports a conservative radiologic approach: Homogeneous adrenal lesions with non-contrast computed tomography attenuation ≤ 10 Hounsfield units are considered benign, and emerging data suggest this threshold may safely extend to ≤ 20 Hounsfield units. The utility of adrenal washout computed tomography is increasingly questioned due to its poor discrimination of pheochromocytoma and limited cost-effectiveness. Future research should address psychiatric consequences and novel etiological factors.