BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2026; 18(4): 119347
Published online Apr 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i4.119347
Magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive breast cancer tool - the relevance of breast edema score: A retrospective study
Anna Vasilska, Silvia Tsvetkova, Katya Doykova, Lyubomir Chervenkov, Tsvetelina Velikova, Margarita Vasilska, Sara Sariyan
Anna Vasilska, Silvia Tsvetkova, Katya Doykova, Lyubomir Chervenkov, Margarita Vasilska, Sara Sariyan, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria
Anna Vasilska, Katya Doykova, Lyubomir Chervenkov, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital Kaspela, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria
Tsvetelina Velikova, Medical Faculty, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia 1407, Bulgaria
Author contributions: Vasilska A, Tsvetkova S, and Doykova K designed the research study; Vasilska A and Tsvetkova S were responsible for the study research, investigation, and resources; Doykova K, Chervenkov L, and Velikova T were responsible for visualization and supervision; Vasilska A, Velikova T, Vasilska M, and Sariyan S analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; Chervenkov L and Velikova T were responsible for project administration and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (approval No. 182/01.06.2022).
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: All relevant data are presented in the manuscript.
Corresponding author: Lyubomir Chervenkov, MD, PhD, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bul Vasil Aprilov 15A, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria. lyubo.ch@gmail.com
Received: January 26, 2026
Revised: February 20, 2026
Accepted: April 2, 2026
Published online: April 28, 2026
Processing time: 89 Days and 13 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides valuable information for tumor detection, as well as potential applications in molecular characterization and prognostication. A key feature detectable on MRI is the presence of breast edema, which has been associated with tumor aggressiveness and poorer clinical outcomes.

AIM

To determine the correlation between intramammary edema patterns as observed on breast MRI and the histopathological and molecular characteristics of the tumor.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, 123 women with biopsy-proven breast cancer underwent preoperative breast MRI from June 2022 to June 2025. The classification of edema was determined on T2-weighted images, divided into four breast edema score (BES) categories: BES-1 (no edema), BES-2 (peritumoral edema), BES-3 (prepectoral edema), and BES-4 (subcutaneous edema). The MRI findings were correlated with histological type, molecular subtype, receptor status, Ki67 index, and lymph node involvement. Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 28.

RESULTS

Edema was observed in 45.5% of patients. Statistically significant correlation was observed between BES and molecular subtypes (P < 0.001), hormone receptor status (P < 0.001), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression (P < 0.001). Higher BES categories (BES 2-4) exhibited a higher prevalence in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and triple-negative tumors, while the absence of edema (BES-1) demonstrated a predominance in hormone receptor-positive subtypes.

CONCLUSION

The presence and severity of MRI-based breast edema score have been found to correlate with aggressive molecular subtypes, underscoring the potential role of BES in prognostic stratification and guiding tailored treatment strategies.

Keywords: Breast magnetic resonance imaging; Breast cancer; Intramammary edema; Breast edema score; T2-weighted imaging; Molecular subtype; Hormone receptor status; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression; Ki-67 proliferation index; Prognostic imaging biomarker

Core Tip: Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of intramammary edema may serve as a practical imaging biomarker reflecting breast cancer biology. Using a simple four-level breast edema score on T2-weighted images, edema patterns can be linked to key histopathological and molecular features, including tumor subtype, receptor status, proliferation index, and nodal involvement. Higher breast edema score categories tend to accompany more aggressive molecular profiles, whereas the absence of edema is more frequently observed in hormone receptor-positive disease. Therefore, incorporating breast edema scoring into routine preoperative magnetic resonance imaging interpretation could support risk stratification and help guide individualized treatment planning in clinical practice.