BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Cardiol. Oct 26, 2025; 17(10): 111941
Published online Oct 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i10.111941
Dual versus single antiplatelet therapy after lower extremity revascularization in peripheral artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Mohammad Maroof Shahid, Debvarsha Mandal, Ashesh Das, Pershan Kumar, Nikil Kumar, Absar Mukhtar, Hooria Ejaz, Muhammad Soban Jaffar, Mavia Habib, Ayesha Afzal, Mirza Muhammad Hadeed Khawar, Ikra Rana
Mohammad Maroof Shahid, Absar Mukhtar, Hooria Ejaz, Muhammad Soban Jaffar, Mavia Habib, Mirza Muhammad Hadeed Khawar, Department of Cardiology, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan
Debvarsha Mandal, Department of Cardiology, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad 4797, Netherlands
Ashesh Das, Department of Cardiology, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata 700001, West Bengal, India
Pershan Kumar, Department of Cardiology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi 10017, Sindh, Pakistan
Nikil Kumar, Department of Cardiology, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi 74000, Sindh, Pakistan
Ayesha Afzal, Department of Cardiology, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad 38000, Punjab, Pakistan
Ikra Rana, Department of Medicine, International School of Medicine, International University of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek 720074, Kyrgyzstan
Co-first authors: Mohammad Maroof Shahid and Debvarsha Mandal.
Author contributions: Shahid MM, Mandal D, and Das A led conceptualization, methodology and formal analysis, wrote and reviewed the manuscript; Kumar P, Kumar N, and Mukhtar A led software, validation, investigation, wrote and reviewed the manuscript; Ejaz H, Jaffar MS, Habib M, Afzal A, and Khawar MMH wrote and reviewed the manuscript; Rana I supervised the project, led data curation, wrote and reviewed the manuscript; all authors thoroughly reviewed and endorsed the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ikra Rana, MD, Department of Medicine, International School of Medicine, International University of Kyrgyzstan, 6 Street, Bishkek 720074, Kyrgyzstan. ikrarana100@gmail.com
Received: July 14, 2025
Revised: July 29, 2025
Accepted: August 25, 2025
Published online: October 26, 2025
Processing time: 102 Days and 21.4 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects millions globally, with a 5.6% prevalence in 2015 impacting 236 million adults, rising above 10% in those over 60 due to factors like diabetes and smoking. Post-revascularization, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) is standard, but dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may improve outcomes, though duration and bleeding risks are unclear. The 2024 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines endorse short-term DAPT, yet evidence gaps remain in comparative efficacy and safety. We hypothesized that DAPT reduces cardiovascular events and reinterventions vs SAPT without significantly elevating bleeding in PAD patients’ post-lower extremity revascularization.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAPT vs SAPT in PAD patients’ post-revascularization.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, searching PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect up to July 2025. Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies from various global settings (e.g., hospitals, tertiary care) comparing DAPT (aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor for > 1 month) to SAPT in symptomatic PAD patients undergoing endovascular or surgical revascularization (n up to 28244 participants selected via eligibility criteria). Data were pooled using random-effects models for risk ratio (RR) with 95%CI; heterogeneity was assessed via the I² statistic. Quality appraisal used Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions for cohorts and Risk of Bias 2.0 for RCTs; certainty was evaluated via Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Twelve studies (3 RCTs, 9 cohorts, conducted 2010–2025 with follow-ups of 6 months to 5 years) were included. DAPT showed no significant difference but a trend toward reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.27–1.01, P = 0.05, DAPT of 298/9545 events vs SAPT of 165/566 events) or stroke (RR: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.30–1.72, P = 0.46, DAPT of 16/3729 events vs SAPT of 41/7673 events) vs SAPT. DAPT significantly reduced cardiac mortality (RR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.27–0.80, P = 0.006, DAPT of 78/2903 events vs SAPT of 171/1465 events, risk difference: -5.4%), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.71–0.94, P = 0.004, DAPT of 233/7704 events vs SAPT of 262/9130 events, risk difference: -1.8%), and major reintervention (RR: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.35–0.98, P = 0.04, DAPT of 803/205 events vs SAPT of 1197/4 events, risk difference: -42%). Bleeding showed no difference (RR: 1.12, 95%CI: 0.42–3.03, P = 0.82, DAPT of 195/2775 events vs SAPT of 202/8234 events). Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 59%–97%). Quality revealed moderate to serious bias in cohorts and some concerns in RCTs; GRADE certainty moderate for cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, reintervention, low for others due to inconsistency and imprecision.

CONCLUSION

DAPT reduces cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and major reintervention risks compared to SAPT in PAD post-revascularization without apparent bleeding increase, though limited by heterogeneity and low certainty for some outcomes.

Keywords: Peripheral artery disease; Dual antiplatelet therapy; Single antiplatelet therapy; Lower extremity revascularization; Endovascular intervention; Surgical bypass; Cardiovascular outcomes; Bleeding risk

Core Tip: This meta-analysis synthesizes evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies to compare dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) following lower extremity revascularization in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The findings demonstrate that DAPT is associated with reduced cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and major reintervention risk compared to SAPT, without a significant increase in bleeding complications. These results support the short-term use of DAPT in PAD management post-revascularization and inform current clinical guidelines.