BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 112954
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.112954
Clinical features of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer and real-world multi-scale correlation analysis
Yuan Li, Chu-Yan Wang, Ya-Xin Li, Zhu-Jun Wu, Lin-Jie Guo
Yuan Li, Chu-Yan Wang, Ya-Xin Li, Zhu-Jun Wu, Lin-Jie Guo, Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
Co-first authors: Yuan Li and Chu-Yan Wang.
Author contributions: Li Y and Guo LJ participated in the literature search and study design; Li Y, Wang CY, and Guo LJ participated in the data analysis, data interpretation, writing, and critical revision; Li Y and Wang CY contributed equally to this article, they are the co-first authors of this manuscript; Li Y, Wang CY, Guo LJ, Li YX, and Wu ZJ participated in data collection; Li YX and Wu ZJ reviewed all the medical imaging, and prepared all the figures; and all authors reviewed the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 2025 (419).
Informed consent statement: Given the retrospective nature of the study, the Institutional Review Board granted a waiver for the requirement of informed consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Lin-Jie Guo, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. guolj08@163.com
Received: August 15, 2025
Revised: September 12, 2025
Accepted: December 2, 2025
Published online: January 27, 2026
Processing time: 159 Days and 24 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) remains an important issue in endoscopic examination. This study investigates the clinical features of PCCRC and possible correlation factors.

AIM

To explore clinical features of PCCRC and correlation factors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis enrolled patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) via colonoscopy at West China Hospital, Sichuan University, between January 1, 2022, and December 30, 2024. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, endoscopic findings, and miss records were extracted from electronic medical records and telephone follow-ups. An exploratory analysis was performed to identify causes of missed diagnosis during endoscopy.

RESULTS

Among 5411 colonoscopies in 2047 CRC patients, 66 prior examinations (27 colonoscopies in 17 non-PCCRC patients; 39 colonoscopies in 25 PCCRC patients) failed to establish diagnosis. The overall miss rate was 1.2%, with a PCCRC rate of 0.7%. Compared to the non-PCCRC group, advanced age was significantly associated with PCCRC (P = 0.006). The most common location that occurred PCCRC was sigmoid colon. PCCRC cases had higher rate of prior CRC surgery (41.0%). For endoscopists, PCCRC cases with CRC surgery increased the risk of judgement error. Insertion time demonstrated a positive correlation with missed diagnosis risk, whereas withdrawal time exhibited a negative correlation.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of PCCRC remains significant. Beyond tumor characteristics, endoscopist proficiency and procedural factors critically impact detection accuracy.

Keywords: Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer; Gastrointestinal endoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Colonoscopy quality; Endoscopist

Core Tip: The incidence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (CRC) remains significant. Patients with advanced age or prior CRC surgical history are associated with an elevated risk of post-colonoscopy CRC and may warrant shorter surveillance intervals for follow-up colonoscopy. The proficiency of the endoscopist can also influence the incidence of post-colonoscopy CRC. Enhancing technical proficiency among endoscopists and prolonging withdrawal time during colonoscopy may reduce post-colonoscopy CRC risk.