BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 112182
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.112182
Effectiveness of different appendiceal stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy in children: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Waleed A Elsayed, Sayed Ahmed Elhadi, Dalia Gad, Hanan Mahmoud Mohamed, Tarig Elsaid, Mahmoud Fahmy Omar, Ahmad Abdullah Almousa, Ahmed Elkhouly
Waleed A Elsayed, Department of Pediatric Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of University, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Khobar 34447, Saudi Arabia
Sayed Ahmed Elhadi, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta 34511, Egypt
Dalia Gad, Hanan Mahmoud Mohamed, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11511, Egypt
Tarig Elsaid, Ahmed Elkhouly, Pediatric Surgery department, Maternity and Children Hospital Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, Tabuk 43200, Saudi Arabia
Mahmoud Fahmy Omar, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Royal Commission Hospital, Al Jubayl 35417, Saudi Arabia
Ahmad Abdullah Almousa, Department of General Surgery, Royal Commission Hospital, Aljubail 35417, Saudi Arabia
Author contributions: All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Elsayed WA, Elhadi SA and Gad D; the first draft of the manuscript was written by Mohamed HM, Elsaid T, Omar MF, Almousa AA, Elkhouly A and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript; all authors read and approved the final manuscript
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors have no conflict of interest related to the manuscript.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Waleed A Elsayed, MD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of University, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Building 3238, Muhamad Elyusuf Street, Khobar 34447, Saudi Arabia. wasayed@iau.edu.sa
Received: July 21, 2025
Revised: August 7, 2025
Accepted: September 18, 2025
Published online: November 27, 2025
Processing time: 128 Days and 15.6 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard treatment for acute appendicitis in children, offering reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery compared to open surgery. A critical aspect of LA is the secure closure of the appendiceal stump to avoid complications such as leakage and abscess formation. Various closure techniques are employed, including endoloops (ELs), staplers, clips, and energy devices; however, the optimal method remains unclear due to inconsistent evidence.

AIM

To systematically evaluate and rank the effectiveness and safety of different appendiceal stump closure techniques used in pediatric LA. By assessing outcomes such as postoperative complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay, this analysis seeks to provide evidence-based guidance to clarify clinical decision-making and optimize patient care.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis, conducted according to PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, compared the effectiveness and safety of stump closure methods in pediatric LA. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Scopus up to May 1, 2025. Eligible studies included both randomized and non-randomized designs reporting surgical outcomes in pediatric patients. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A frequentist network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted using R software to evaluate total complications (primary outcome), as well as operative time and hospital stay (secondary outcomes). P-scores were used to rank the effectiveness of treatments.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies comprising over 50000 pediatric patients were included in the network meta-analysis comparing appendiceal stump closure techniques in LA. No significant differences in total postoperative complications or hospital stay were observed among techniques, including EL, endostapler, polymer clip, LigaSure, harmonic scalpel (HS), and sutures. HS showed a statistically significant reduction in operative time compared to EL (mean difference: -13.5 minutes), while other methods did not demonstrate significant time savings. No technique was associated with a statistically significant increase or decrease in postoperative complications or length of stay. Publication bias was minimal, and the methodological quality of included studies was moderate to good.

CONCLUSION

While all closure techniques show similar safety profiles, HS offers shorter operating times. These findings support tailoring stump closure method selection based on operative efficiency and resource availability.

Keywords: Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy; Appendicitis; Appendiceal stump closure; Endo loop; Endo-stapler

Core Tip: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard treatment for acute appendicitis in children, offering reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery compared to open surgery. A critical aspect of LA is the secure closure of the appendiceal stump to avoid complications such as leakage and abscess formation. Various closure techniques are used, including endoloops, staplers, clips, and energy devices, but the optimal method remains unclear due to inconsistent evidence.