BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2025; 16(12): 112830
Published online Dec 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i12.112830
Glycemic control, weight-loss effects, and safety of cotadutide in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abul Bashar Mohammad Kamrul-Hasan, Deep Dutta, Lakshmi Nagendra, Sindhu Doddabokikere Basavarajappa, Harish Bukkasagar Girijashankar, Ameya Joshi, Joseph M Pappachan
Abul Bashar Mohammad Kamrul-Hasan, Department of Endocrinology, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh 2200, Bangladesh
Deep Dutta, Department of Endocrinology, CEDAR Superspeciality Healthcare, New Delhi 110075, Delhi, India
Lakshmi Nagendra, Department of Endocrinology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, Karnataka, India
Sindhu Doddabokikere Basavarajappa, Department of Medical Statistics, School of Life Sciences, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, Karnataka, India
Harish Bukkasagar Girijashankar, Department of Anesthesiology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, Karnataka, India
Ameya Joshi, Department of Endocrinology, Bhaktivedanta Hospital & Research Institute, Thane 401107, Maharashtra, India
Joseph M Pappachan, Faculty of Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Joseph M Pappachan, Department of Endocrinology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnātaka, India
Joseph M Pappachan, Department of Endocrinology, Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Trust, Chester CH2 IUL, Cheshire West and Chester, United Kingdom
Author contributions: Kamrul-Hasan ABM and Dutta D conceptualized the study and performed statistical analysis; Kamrul-Hasan ABM, Dutta D, and Nagendra L drafted the manuscript; Dutta D, Nagendra L, and Joshi A formulated the methodology; Nagendra L, Basavarajappa SD, Girijashankar HB, and Pappachan JM were involved in the literature search, study selection, and data extraction; Basavarajappa SD, Girijashankar HB, Joshi A, and Pappachan JM critically analyzed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Joseph M Pappachan, MD, MRCP, FRCP, Professor, Senior Researcher, Faculty of Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, All Saints Building, Manchester M15 6BH, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom. drpappachan@yahoo.co.in
Received: August 7, 2025
Revised: October 11, 2025
Accepted: October 23, 2025
Published online: December 15, 2025
Processing time: 130 Days and 14.4 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Cotadutide (MEDI0382) is a twincretin that acts as an agonist for both the glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptors. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published evaluating the use of cotadutide in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), showing promising results. However, the efficacy and safety of the drug use have been inadequately explored by systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

AIM

To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of cotadutide in individuals with T2D having overweight or obesity.

METHODS

The systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024511703), and the protocol summary can be accessed online. Several databases and registries, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were systematically searched using related terms from their inception to May 15, 2025, for RCTs involving individuals with T2D receiving cotadutide in the intervention group. Review Manager web was used to conduct meta-analysis using random-effects models. The co-primary outcomes of interest were the changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and the percent changes in body weight from baseline. The results of the outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The analysis of outcomes was stratified according to whether the control group received a placebo, denoted as the placebo control group (PCG), or an active comparator, referred to as the active control group (ACG).

RESULTS

Nine RCTs (mostly phase 2 RCTs, n = 1525) with study durations varying from 28 days to 54 weeks that met all the inclusion criteria were analyzed; five studies had a low overall risk of bias, while the other four had some concerns. Compared to the PCG, greater reductions in HbA1c were achieved with cotadutide 100 μg (MD -0.77%, 95%CI: -1.06 to -0.47), 200 μg (MD -0.68%, 95%CI: -1.12 to -0.23), 300 μg (MD -0.67%, 95%CI: -0.79 to -0.56), and 600 μg (MD -0.69%, 95%CI: -0.97 to -0.41). Cotadutide 100 μg (MD -1.74%, 95%CI: -3.23 to -0.25), 200 μg (MD -2.56%, 95%CI: -3.37 to -1.75), 300 μg (MD -3.49%, 95%CI: -4.14 to -2.84), and 600 μg (MD -5.45%, 95%CI: -7.17 to -3.73) achieved greater percent reductions in body weight from baseline. However, the certainty of evidence for HbA1c and percent body weight reductions was very low to low. Cotadutide, at all doses, also outperformed PCG in reducing fasting plasma glucose and absolute body weight. The changes in HbA1c, percent body weight, fasting plasma glucose, and absolute body weight were similar between the cotadutide group and the ACG. Compared to PCG, pooled doses of cotadutide increased the risks of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs, and discontinuation of the study drug due to AEs, but not for serious AEs. More subjects experienced overall gastrointestinal AEs, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and decreased appetite with cotadutide than with PCG. Compared to the ACG, none of the AEs showed increased risk in the cotadutide group.

CONCLUSION

Cotadutide demonstrated glycemic control and weight-loss benefits in short-term, small RCTs (mostly phase 2). However, small sample sizes, very low to low certainty of evidence, and the absence of data on long-term cardiovascular and renal outcomes highlight substantial uncertainties, warranting cautious interpretation and further investigation in larger, longer-term trials to establish its safety and efficacy profile.

Keywords: Cotadutide; Type 2 diabetes; Obesity; Diabesity; Glycated hemoglobin; Body weight; Adverse events

Core Tip: Cotadutide, a dual glucagon-like peptide-1/glucagon receptor agonist, effectively lowers glycated hemoglobin and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity. A meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials reveals modest reductions in blood sugar and weight compared to the placebo, with efficacy similar to that of active comparators. Common side effects include gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, constipation, decreased appetite) without an excess risk of serious adverse events. Continued use should weigh the benefits of glucose and weight control against the risk of gastrointestinal side effects. Cotadutide’s safety and long-term outcomes require further research; however, it shows promise as a potential therapeutic option for metabolic disorders.