Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2025; 17(9): 110245
Published online Sep 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i9.110245
Published online Sep 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i9.110245
Table 1 Characteristics of patients with peritoneal lavage cytology-positive who underwent gastrectomy
Variables | All (n = 82) |
Age | 74.3 (42-96) |
Sex | |
Male | 56 |
Female | 26 |
Performance status (ECOG) | |
0 | 56 |
1 | 20 |
2 | 6 |
Macroscopic type | |
Non-type 4 | 60 |
Type 4 | 22 |
Preoperative CEA | |
> ULN | 21 |
≤ ULN | 60 |
Unknown | 1 |
Preoperative CA19-9 | 1 |
> ULN | 25 |
≤ ULN | 55 |
Unknown | 2 |
Pathological T factor | |
T3 | 16 |
T4a | 59 |
T4b | 7 |
Pathological N factor | |
N0 | 1 |
N1-2 | 35 |
N3 | 46 |
Histology | |
Intestinal | 31 |
Diffuse | 51 |
HER2 status | |
Positive | 14 |
Negative | 46 |
Unknown | 22 |
Surgery | |
Distal gastrectomy | 43 |
Total gastrectomy | 37 |
Proximal gastrectomy | 2 |
Lymph node dissection | |
< D2 | 21 |
D2 | 48 |
D2+ | 13 |
Postoperative complication1 | |
Yes (grade III) | 22 (5) |
No | 60 |
Postoperative CTx | |
Yes | 42 |
No | 40 |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival in patients with peritoneal lavage cytology-positive who underwent gastrectomy
Variables | n | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | ||
Age (years) | |||||
≤ 75 | 41 | Reference | Reference | ||
> 75 | 41 | 2.20 (1.25-3.87) | 0.006 | 1.81 (0.98-3.34) | 0.057 |
Gender | |||||
Male | 56 | Reference | Reference | ||
Female | 26 | 1.79 (1.01-3.21) | 0.048 | 1.45 (0.79-2.69) | 0.233 |
Performance status (ECOG) | |||||
0, 1 | 76 | Reference | |||
2 | 6 | 1.03 (0.32-3.33) | 0.955 | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | |||||
< 25 | 73 | Reference | |||
≥ 25 | 8 | 1.06 (0.42-2.67) | 0.900 | ||
Preoperative CEA | |||||
≤ ULN | 60 | Reference | |||
> ULN | 21 | 1.50 (0.81-2.80) | 0.201 | ||
Preoperative CA19-9 | |||||
≤ ULN | 55 | Reference | |||
> ULN | 25 | 0.81 (0.42-1.56) | 0.527 | ||
Surgery | |||||
DG, PG | 45 | Reference | |||
TG | 37 | 1.21 (0.70-2.10) | 0.504 | ||
Lymph node dissection | |||||
≥ D2 | 61 | Reference | |||
< D2 | 21 | 1.36 (0.71-2.62) | 0.354 | ||
Postoperative complication | |||||
No | 60 | Reference | |||
Yes | 22 | 1.47 (0.82-2.63) | 0.200 | ||
Macroscopic type | |||||
Non-type 4 | 60 | Reference | |||
Type 4 | 22 | 1.63 (0.90-2.95) | 0.107 | ||
Histology | |||||
Intestinal | 31 | Reference | Reference | ||
Diffuse | 51 | 1.89 (1.05-3.39) | 0.034 | 2.65 (1.43-4.92) | 0.002 |
pT | |||||
T3 | 16 | Reference | |||
T4 | 66 | 1.14 (0.53-2.42) | 0.743 | ||
pN | |||||
N0-2 | 36 | Reference | |||
N3 | 46 | 1.08 (0.62-1.88) | 0.785 | ||
Postoperative CTx | |||||
Yes | 42 | Reference | Reference | ||
No | 40 | 3.24 (1.82-5.78) | 0.001 | 3.26 (1.75-6.08) | 0.001 |
Table 3 Characteristics of patients with peritoneal lavage cytology-positive who undergo gastrectomy followed by postoperative chemotherapy, n (%)
Conventional chemotherapy1 (n = 25) | New combination chemotherapy2 (n = 17) | P value | |
Age (years) | 72 (42-87) | 66.2 (45-76) | 0.073 |
Gender | 0.589 | ||
Male | 20 (80) | 14 (82) | |
Female | 5 (20) | 3 (18) | |
Performance status (ECOG) | 0.595 | ||
0, 1 | 24 (96) | 17 (100) | |
2 | 1 (4) | 0 (0) | |
Preoperative BMI (kg/m2) | 21.1 (17.5-27.7) | 21.7 (17.3-27.5) | 0.531 |
CEA | 0.437 | ||
≤ ULN | 20 (83) | 13 (76) | |
> ULN | 4 (7) | 4 (24) | |
CA19-9 | 0.565 | ||
≤ ULN | 19 (79) | 13 (76) | |
> ULN | 5 (21) | 4 (24) | |
Surgery | 0.175 | ||
DG, PG | 17 (68) | 8 (47) | |
TG | 8 (32) | 9 (53) | |
Lymph node dissection | 0.397 | ||
≥ D2 | 20 (80) | 15 (88) | |
< D2 | 5 (20) | 2 (12) | |
Postoperative complication | 0.589 | ||
No | 20 (80) | 14 (82) | |
Yes | 5 (20) | 3 (18) | |
Macroscopic type | 0.173 | ||
Non-type 4 | 9 (36) | 3 (18) | |
Type 4 | 16 (64) | 14 (82) | |
Histology | 0.542 | ||
Intestinal | 8 (32) | 7 (41) | |
Diffuse | 17 (68) | 10 (59) | |
pT | 0.463 | ||
T3 | 6 (24) | 3 (18) | |
T4 | 19 (76) | 14 (82) | |
pN | 0.845 | ||
N0-2 | 11 (44) | 8 (47) | |
N3 | 14 (56) | 9 (53) | |
HER2 status | 0.346 | ||
Positive | 16 | 8 | |
Negative | 6 | 4 | |
Unknown | 3 | 5 | |
BW decrease rate3 | 0.465 | ||
< 10% | 18 (81) | 15 (88) | |
≥ 10% | 4 (19) | 2 (12) | |
Pre-chemotherapy BMI (kg/m2) | 19.9 (15.1-26.3) | 20.7 (16.0-25.5) | 0.377 |
Ccr (mL/minute) | 0.174 | ||
< 60 | 14 (56) | 13 (82) | |
≥ 60 | 11 (44) | 4 (18) | |
Pre-chemotherapy CEA | 0.534 | ||
≤ ULN | 21 (84) | 15 (88) | |
> ULN | 4 (16) | 2 (12) | |
Pre-chemotherapy CA19-9 | 0.630 | ||
≤ ULN | 22 (92) | 16 (94) | |
> ULN | 2 (8) | 1 (6) |
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival in patients with peritoneal lavage cytology-positive who underwent postoperative chemotherapy
Variables | n | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | ||
Age (years) | |||||
≤ 75 | 29 | Reference | |||
> 75 | 13 | 1.39 (0.58-3.33) | 0.460 | ||
Gender | |||||
Male | 34 | Reference | |||
Female | 8 | 1.55 (0.57-4.21) | 0.395 | ||
Performance status (ECOG) | |||||
0, 1 | 41 | Reference | |||
2 | 1 | 1.82 (0.24-13.69) | 0.562 | ||
Pre-chemotherapy BMI (kg/m2) | |||||
≥ 25 | 2 | Reference | |||
< 25 | 37 | 1.21 (0.16-9.04) | 0.854 | ||
Pre-chemotherapy CEA | |||||
≤ ULN | 36 | Reference | |||
> ULN | 6 | 1.46 (0.49-4.30) | 0.498 | ||
Pre-chemotherapy CA19-9 | |||||
≤ ULN | 38 | Reference | |||
> ULN | 3 | 1.53 (0.36-6.60) | 0.566 | ||
Surgery | |||||
DG, PG | 25 | Reference | |||
TG | 17 | 1.21 (0.52-2.82) | 0.667 | ||
Lymph node dissection | |||||
≥ D2 | 35 | Reference | |||
< D2 | 7 | 1.09(0.37-3.22) | 0.883 | ||
Postoperative complication | |||||
No | 34 | Reference | |||
Yes | 8 | 1.18 (0.43-3.21) | 0.746 | ||
Macroscopic type | |||||
Non-type 4 | 14 | Reference | Reference | ||
Type 4 | 28 | 2.17 (0.92-5.09) | 0.076 | 5.00 (1.76-14.25) | 0.003 |
Histology | |||||
Intestinal | 15 | Reference | |||
Diffuse | 27 | 1.78 (0.72-4.38) | 0.210 | ||
pT | |||||
T3 | 9 | Reference | |||
T4 | 33 | 1.86 (0.55-6.33) | 0.318 | ||
pN | |||||
N0-2 | 19 | Reference | |||
N3 | 23 | 0.98 (0.42-2.27) | 0.964 | ||
HER2 status | |||||
Positive | 10 | Reference | |||
Negative | 24 | 2.09 (0.69-6.39) | 0.194 | ||
Postoperative CTx | |||||
New combination chemotherapy | 17 | Reference | Reference | ||
Conventional chemotherapy | 25 | 5.34 (1.77-16.14) | 0.003 | 9.53 (2.54-35.79) | < 0.001 |
Duration of postoperative CTx | |||||
≥ 1 year | 16 | Reference | Reference | ||
< 1 year | 26 | 12.75 (2.98-55.55) | < 0.001 | 18.98 (3.68-97.93) | < 0.001 |
Ccr (mL/minute) | |||||
≥ 60 | 27 | Reference | |||
< 60 | 15 | 1.08 (0.45-2.61) | 0.862 | ||
Grade III adverse event1 | |||||
No | 22 | Reference | |||
Yes | 20 | 0.64 (0.27-1.55) | 0.326 |
Table 5 Details of chemotherapy
Conventional chemotherapy (n = 25) | New combination chemotherapy (n = 17) | P value | |
TI until the postoperative CTx (week)1 | 5.1 (1.9-9.1) | 5.1 (1.4-10.6) | 0.908 |
TTF (months) | |||
Oral drug | 12.6(1.6-49.0) | 17.0 (3.0-45.8) | 0.129 |
Intravenous | 5.3 (1.2-8.6) | 5.4 (2.1-11.4) | 0.946 |
Course: Median (range) | |||
Intravenous | 3.6 (1-5) | 6.2 (2-15) | 0.098 |
RDI: Median (%) | |||
Intravenous | 74.5 (54.5-100) | 82.1 (60.9-100) | 0.276 |
< 80%: > 80% | 4:2 | 7:10 | 0.001 |
Adverse event (grade III)2 | 8 (32%) | 17 (71%) | 0.014 |
Reason for CTx discontinuation | |||
Recurrence: Adverse events, etc.3 | 15:4:6 | 4:4:9 | 0.051 |
Subsequent CTx after recurrence | 10/15 (67%) | 2/4 (50%) | 0.475 |
- Citation: Sugiyama Y, Tanabe K, Yanagawa S, Tazawa H, Toyota K, Kano M, Misumi T, Shishida M, Okano K, Hotta R, Ota H, Imaoka Y, Fukuda T, Takahashi S, Ohdan H. Prognostic factors and efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology after gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(9): 110245
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i9/110245.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i9.110245