BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2025; 17(9): 110245
Published online Sep 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i9.110245
Table 1 Characteristics of patients with peritoneal lavage cytology-positive who underwent gastrectomy
Variables
All (n = 82)
Age74.3 (42-96)
Sex
Male56
Female26
Performance status (ECOG)
056
120
26
Macroscopic type
Non-type 460
Type 422
Preoperative CEA
> ULN21
≤ ULN60
Unknown1
Preoperative CA19-91
> ULN25
≤ ULN55
Unknown2
Pathological T factor
T316
T4a59
T4b7
Pathological N factor
N01
N1-235
N346
Histology
Intestinal31
Diffuse51
HER2 status
Positive14
Negative46
Unknown22
Surgery
Distal gastrectomy43
Total gastrectomy37
Proximal gastrectomy2
Lymph node dissection
< D221
D248
D2+13
Postoperative complication1
Yes (grade III)22 (5)
No60
Postoperative CTx
Yes42
No40
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival in patients with peritoneal lavage cytology-positive who underwent gastrectomy
VariablesnUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis

HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (years)
≤ 7541ReferenceReference
> 75412.20 (1.25-3.87)0.0061.81 (0.98-3.34)0.057
Gender
Male56ReferenceReference
Female261.79 (1.01-3.21)0.0481.45 (0.79-2.69)0.233
Performance status (ECOG)
0, 176Reference
261.03 (0.32-3.33)0.955
BMI (kg/m2)
< 2573Reference
≥ 2581.06 (0.42-2.67)0.900
Preoperative CEA
≤ ULN60Reference
> ULN211.50 (0.81-2.80)0.201
Preoperative CA19-9
≤ ULN55Reference
> ULN250.81 (0.42-1.56)0.527
Surgery
DG, PG45Reference
TG371.21 (0.70-2.10)0.504
Lymph node dissection
≥ D261Reference
< D2211.36 (0.71-2.62)0.354
Postoperative complication
No60Reference
Yes221.47 (0.82-2.63)0.200
Macroscopic type
Non-type 460Reference
Type 4221.63 (0.90-2.95)0.107
Histology
Intestinal31ReferenceReference
Diffuse511.89 (1.05-3.39)0.0342.65 (1.43-4.92)0.002
pT
T316Reference
T4661.14 (0.53-2.42)0.743
pN
N0-236Reference
N3461.08 (0.62-1.88)0.785
Postoperative CTx
Yes42ReferenceReference
No403.24 (1.82-5.78)0.0013.26 (1.75-6.08)0.001
Table 3 Characteristics of patients with peritoneal lavage cytology-positive who undergo gastrectomy followed by postoperative chemotherapy, n (%)

Conventional chemotherapy1 (n = 25)
New combination chemotherapy2 (n = 17)
P value
Age (years)72 (42-87)66.2 (45-76)0.073
Gender0.589
Male20 (80)14 (82)
Female5 (20)3 (18)
Performance status (ECOG)0.595
0, 124 (96)17 (100)
21 (4)0 (0)
Preoperative BMI (kg/m2)21.1 (17.5-27.7)21.7 (17.3-27.5)0.531
CEA0.437
≤ ULN20 (83)13 (76)
> ULN4 (7)4 (24)
CA19-90.565
≤ ULN19 (79)13 (76)
> ULN5 (21)4 (24)
Surgery0.175
DG, PG17 (68)8 (47)
TG8 (32)9 (53)
Lymph node dissection0.397
≥ D220 (80)15 (88)
< D25 (20)2 (12)
Postoperative complication0.589
No20 (80)14 (82)
Yes5 (20)3 (18)
Macroscopic type0.173
Non-type 49 (36)3 (18)
Type 416 (64)14 (82)
Histology0.542
Intestinal8 (32)7 (41)
Diffuse17 (68)10 (59)
pT0.463
T36 (24)3 (18)
T419 (76)14 (82)
pN0.845
N0-211 (44)8 (47)
N314 (56)9 (53)
HER2 status0.346
Positive168
Negative64
Unknown35
BW decrease rate30.465
< 10%18 (81)15 (88)
≥ 10%4 (19)2 (12)
Pre-chemotherapy BMI (kg/m2)19.9 (15.1-26.3)20.7 (16.0-25.5)0.377
Ccr (mL/minute)0.174
< 6014 (56)13 (82)
≥ 6011 (44)4 (18)
Pre-chemotherapy CEA0.534
≤ ULN21 (84)15 (88)
> ULN4 (16)2 (12)
Pre-chemotherapy CA19-90.630
≤ ULN22 (92)16 (94)
> ULN2 (8)1 (6)
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival in patients with peritoneal lavage cytology-positive who underwent postoperative chemotherapy
VariablesnUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (years)
≤ 75 29Reference
> 75131.39 (0.58-3.33)0.460
Gender
Male34Reference
Female81.55 (0.57-4.21)0.395
Performance status (ECOG)
0, 141Reference
211.82 (0.24-13.69)0.562
Pre-chemotherapy BMI (kg/m2)
≥ 252Reference
< 25371.21 (0.16-9.04)0.854
Pre-chemotherapy CEA
≤ ULN36Reference
> ULN61.46 (0.49-4.30)0.498
Pre-chemotherapy CA19-9
≤ ULN38Reference
> ULN31.53 (0.36-6.60)0.566
Surgery
DG, PG25Reference
TG171.21 (0.52-2.82)0.667
Lymph node dissection
≥ D235Reference
< D271.09(0.37-3.22)0.883
Postoperative complication
No34Reference
Yes81.18 (0.43-3.21)0.746
Macroscopic type
Non-type 414ReferenceReference
Type 4282.17 (0.92-5.09)0.0765.00 (1.76-14.25)0.003
Histology
Intestinal15Reference
Diffuse271.78 (0.72-4.38)0.210
pT
T39Reference
T4331.86 (0.55-6.33)0.318
pN
N0-219Reference
N3230.98 (0.42-2.27)0.964
HER2 status
Positive10Reference
Negative242.09 (0.69-6.39)0.194
Postoperative CTx
New combination chemotherapy17ReferenceReference
Conventional chemotherapy255.34 (1.77-16.14)0.0039.53 (2.54-35.79)< 0.001
Duration of postoperative CTx
≥ 1 year16ReferenceReference
< 1 year2612.75 (2.98-55.55)< 0.00118.98 (3.68-97.93)< 0.001
Ccr (mL/minute)
≥ 6027Reference
< 60151.08 (0.45-2.61)0.862
Grade III adverse event1
No22Reference
Yes200.64 (0.27-1.55)0.326
Table 5 Details of chemotherapy

Conventional chemotherapy (n = 25)
New combination chemotherapy (n = 17)
P value
TI until the postoperative CTx (week)15.1 (1.9-9.1)5.1 (1.4-10.6)0.908
TTF (months)
Oral drug12.6(1.6-49.0)17.0 (3.0-45.8)0.129
Intravenous5.3 (1.2-8.6)5.4 (2.1-11.4)0.946
Course: Median (range)
Intravenous3.6 (1-5)6.2 (2-15)0.098
RDI: Median (%)
Intravenous 74.5 (54.5-100)82.1 (60.9-100)0.276
< 80%: > 80%4:27:100.001
Adverse event (grade III)28 (32%)17 (71%)0.014
Reason for CTx discontinuation
Recurrence: Adverse events, etc.315:4:64:4:90.051
Subsequent CTx after recurrence10/15 (67%)2/4 (50%)0.475