BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2025; 17(10): 109503
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.109503
Table 1 Comparative impact of gut microbiota interventions on immune regulation and colorectal cancer therapy outcomes
Intervention
Key microbes
Mechanism of action
Impact on CRC treatment
Prognostic BiomarkerFn/Fp ratioFn promotes inflammation and tumorigenesis, while Fp has anti-inflammatory and protective effects; Fn/Fp ratio reflects tumor microenvironment statusHigher Fn abundance correlates with poor prognosis, while higher Fp levels associate with better outcomes; Fn/Fp ratio aids in early screening and prognosis assessment
Enhance ChemosensitivityNaB-producing bacteria (e.g., Faecalibacterium) and NaBNaB strengthens gut barrier function, modulates immune activity, and induces tumor cell apoptosis while inhibiting proliferation, migration, and invasionImproves efficacy of OXA and other chemotherapies while reducing side effects
Modulate Immunotherapy ResponseB. fragilis (polysaccharides), Fn (succinic acid)(1) B. fragilis polysaccharides synergize with CTLA-4 inhibitors to activate T cells; and (2) Fn-derived succinate inhibits the cGAS-interferon-β pathway, reducing CD8+ Tcells infiltration(1) Enhances immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy; and (2) High Fn abundance causes anti-PD-1 resistance, reversible via antibiotics or microbiota modulation
Table 2 Conceptual framework of the microbiota-immune axis in colorectal cancer
Level
Key elements
Regulatory mechanisms
Intervention strategies
Translational indicators
Input layerMicrobiomePro-carcinogenic bacteria (e.g., Fusobacterium) activate TLR4/β-catenin - Protective bacteria (e.g., Faecalibacterium) produce NaB to strengthen barrierMicrobiome profiling (qPCR/metagenomics)Fecal α-diversity; Fn/Fp ratio
Host factorsGenetic mutations (e.g., APC), diet (high-fiber/high-fat), antibiotic exposure historyRisk stratification questionnaire + genetic testingPatient subtype classification (inflammatory/metabolic)
Core interaction layerMetabolite-immune crosstalkSCFAs → HDAC inhibition → Treg induction - Secondary bile acids → FXR → IL-23/Th17 activationNaB formulations; FXR antagonistsSerum NaB levels; IL-17A in colon tissue
Cellular networkMicrobial antigens → CD103+ DCs → CD8+ T cell activation - PD-1↑ → dysbiosis → MDSC recruitmentEngineered bacteria delivering DC activators (e.g., FLT3 L)Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cell density; circulating MDSC levels
Effector layerImmune phenotypeInflamed type (high CD8+, TLS+) - Immune-desert (fibrosis, Treg-dominant)Spatial multi-omics (CODEX/mIHC)Immunoscore®, CT-based immune features
Therapeutic responseFusobacterium → oxaliplatin resistance via ABCB1 upregulation - B. fragilis → anti-PD-1 sensitization via polysaccharide-CTLA-4 interactionMicrobiome-guided personalized therapyPFS, ORR
Intervention layerMicrobiome modulationFMT for microbiota rebalancing - Phage therapy targeting pathogensDonor-recipient matching; phage cocktail therapyPost-FMT colonization rate; pathogen load reduction
Immuno-metabolic comboAhR inhibitors (e.g., IK-175) block IDO1-Kyn - STING agonists (e.g., ADU-S100) activate CD103+ DCsOptimization of combination regimens (timing/dosing)IFN-γ in tumor tissue; CXCL10 in blood
Output layerClinical benefitImproved OS; reduced chemo toxicity (e.g., diarrhea)QoL scales; CTC monitoring5-year survival rate; grade ≥ 3 adverse event rate
BiomarkersMicrobial signature (e.g., Clostridium cluster XIVa abundance); immune dynamics (CD8+/FoxP3+ ratio)Liquid biopsy (ctDNA + microbial DNA)AUC of predictive models; longitudinal consistency