BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2026; 18(7): 119971
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.119971
Factors associated with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A Mexican retrospective study
Ismael Brito-Toledo, Jesús Alberto Sansón-Riofrío, Maria Teresa Cervantes-Díaz, Jazmín de Anda-González, Rafael Medrano-Guzmán, Emilio Moreno-González, Eduardo Vadillo, Antonio Ibarra
Ismael Brito-Toledo, Department of Colon and Rectum, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center, Mexican Institute for Social Security, Cuauhtémoc 06720, Mexico City, Mexico
Jesús Alberto Sansón-Riofrío, Department of Surgical Oncology, General Hospital 33, Mexican Institute for Social Security, Bahía de Banderas 63735, Nayarit, Mexico
Maria Teresa Cervantes-Díaz, Department of Research, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center, Mexican Institute for Social Security, Cuauhtémoc 06720, Mexico City, Mexico
Jazmín de Anda-González, Department of Pathology, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center, Mexican Institute for Social Security, Cuauhtémoc 06720, Mexico City, Mexico
Rafael Medrano-Guzmán, Department of Sarcomas and Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center, Mexican Institute for Social Security, Cuauhtémoc 06720, Mexico City, Mexico
Emilio Moreno-González, Antonio Ibarra, Health Sciences Research Center, Anahuac University, Huixquilucan 52786, Mexico City, Mexico
Eduardo Vadillo, Oncology Research Unit, Mexican Institute for Social Security, Cuauhtémoc 06720, Mexico City, Mexico
Co-corresponding authors: Eduardo Vadillo and Antonio Ibarra.
Author contributions: Brito-Toledo I designed the study; Brito-Toledo I and Sansón-Riofrío JA were responsible for developing the methodology; Cervantes-Díaz MT and De Anda-González J participated in the formal analysis and investigation; Brito-Toledo I, Moreno-González E, Ibarra A and Vadillo E wrote the original draft; Medrano-Guzmán R participated in the review and editing of the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The Mexican Institute for Social Security Ethics Committee reviewed and approved the study (Approval No. R-2025-3602-022).
Informed consent statement: All locally advanced rectal cancer patients signed informed consent prior to beginning neoadjuvant therapy.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Corresponding author: Eduardo Vadillo, PhD, Oncology Research Unit, Mexican Institute for Social Security, Av Cuauhtémoc No. 330 Colonia Doctores, Cuauhtémoc 06720, Mexico City, Mexico. evadillo@hotmail.com
Received: February 12, 2026
Revised: March 10, 2026
Accepted: March 26, 2026
Published online: July 15, 2026
Processing time: 144 Days and 22 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Treatment for rectal cancer varies widely among populations due to differences in tumor biology, access to treatment and care systems. Global responses to standard therapies are heterogeneous and data from Latin American populations, particularly Mexican patients, are scarce.

AIM

To assess complete clinical response (cCR) rates, local recurrence, and associated factors in a Mexican neoadjuvant therapy cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study included 101 clinical stage II-III rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was cCR, and pathological complete response (pCR) was assessed among patients who underwent surgery. An overall complete response rate (cCR or pCR) is reported descriptively. An exploratory univariate analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with cCR. Response durability and local recurrence-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The cCR was achieved in 14.9% (n = 15) of the cohort, while overall complete response (cCR or pCR) was observed in 19.8% (n = 20). Among complete responders, 25% (n = 5) had pCR confirmed after surgery. During follow-up, two local recurrences occurred among patients managed with watch-and-wait (2/15; 13.3%), both within the first 16 months. In exploratory univariate analysis, tumor size was inversely associated with the likelihood of achieving cCR (OR = 0.77 per centimeter; 95%CI: 0.61-0.96; P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy achieved 19.8% of cCR, mostly managed by watch-and-wait. Tumor size predicted cCR. These findings support structured surveillance and warrant prospective studies for better predictors.

Keywords: Rectal neoplasms; Neoadjuvant therapy; Clinical complete response; Pathologic complete response; Watch-and-wait

Core Tip: Recognizing the high prevalence of locally advanced rectal cancer at presentation in the Mexican population, we assessed 101 patients with clinical stage II-III rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and found, consistent with global literature, that approximately 20% of patients achieved a complete response, while tumor size was inversely correlated with the probability of achieving a complete clinical response.

Write to the Help Desk