BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2025; 17(11): 112487
Published online Nov 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.112487
Endoscopic ultrasound features of pancreatic solid lesions: Descriptive and predictive analysis on a multicenter sample
Nunzio Zignani, Marco Balzarini, Emanuele Dabizzi, Elia Fracas, Laura Millefanti, Sergio Segato, Maurizio Vecchi, Gianpaolo Cengia, Guido Missale, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Dario Moneghini, Flaminia Cavallaro
Nunzio Zignani, Elia Fracas, Maurizio Vecchi, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Lombardy, Italy
Marco Balzarini, Laura Millefanti, Sergio Segato, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese 21100, Lombardy, Italy
Emanuele Dabizzi, Maurizio Vecchi, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Flaminia Cavallaro, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Lombardy, Italy
Gianpaolo Cengia, Guido Missale, Dario Moneghini, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia 25123, Lombardy, Italy
Author contributions: Zignani N, Cavallaro F, Moneghini D and Balzarini M conceptualized the study; Zignani N, Cavallaro F, Tontini GE contributed to the methodology, formal analysis and original draft preparation; all the authors contributed to data curation and review and editing.
Supported by the Italian Ministry of Health - Current research IRCCS (Funds Dedicated to the Research of the Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano).
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Ethical Committee Lombardia 3, dated April 17, 2024 (ID 4760 - opinion number 4760_17.04.2024_P).
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was not obtained in accordance with local ethical and privacy authorities, as it was deemed a disproportionate effort for the study and due to the demise of many patients enrolled before the study began.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest in relation to the publication of this article.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: The data are only accessible to the researchers and are handled in full compliance with local ethical and legal guidelines.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Nunzio Zignani, MD, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan 20122, Lombardy, Italy. zignani.nunzio@gmail.com
Received: July 29, 2025
Revised: August 20, 2025
Accepted: October 17, 2025
Published online: November 16, 2025
Processing time: 108 Days and 22.4 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is crucial for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a highly aggressive cancer which represents the majority with a prevalence of approximately 85%.

AIM

To identify EUS features that differentiate PDAC from other lesions such as neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and helping in the differential diagnosis, by analyzing a large sample of solid pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective, multicenter study analyzed the endosonographic characteristics of 761 patients with a radiological diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesion, who underwent pancreatic EUS for typing and staging with needle biopsies between 2015 and 2023. General patient characteristics (age and sex) and solid lesion features were collected and described, such lesion size (B-mode), vessel involvement (compression or invasion), ductal dilation, lymphadenopathy, echogenicity, echopattern, margin regularity, multifocality, internal vascularization and elastography. Subsequently, a predictive analysis was performed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictive features for PDAC or NET diagnoses.

RESULTS

Our study enrolled 761 patients, predominantly male with a mean age of 68.6. PDACs were generally larger (mean 33 mm × 27 mm), often had irregular margins, and displayed significant upstream ductal dilation. Hypoechogenicity was common across malignant lesions. In contrast, NETs were smaller (mean 20 mm × 17 mm) and typically had regular margins with multiple lesions. Vascular involvement, although predominant in PDAC, is a common feature of all malignant neoplasms. Multifocality, however, although a rare finding, is more typical of NETs and metastases, and practically absent in the remaining lesions. Predictive analyses showed that ductal dilation and irregular margins were the most significant predictors for PDAC [odds ratio (OR) = 5.75 and 3.83], with hypoechogenicity, heterogeneous echopattern and lymphadenopathies also highly significant (OR = 3.51, 2.56 and 1.99). These features were inversely associated with NETs, with regular margins and absence of ductal involvement or lymphadenopathies (OR = 0.24, 0.86 and 0.45 respectively), as already shown by the descriptive analysis. Finally, age, despite achieving statistical significance, lacks clinical value given an OR trending towards 1.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive overview of EUS features for solid pancreatic lesions, identifying distinct features like upstream ductal dilation and irregular margins for PDAC vs regular margins for NETs as strong diagnostic predictors. These findings enhance the understanding of pancreatic pathologies, offering valuable insights for improved differential diagnosis and clinical management, especially in complex cases. Further prospective studies could build on these results.

Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound; Pancreatic solid lesions; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; Pancreatic metastasis; Focal pancreatitis; Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration/fine needle biopsy; Endoscopic ultrasound features of pancreatic solid lesions

Core Tip: This multicenter observational study provides a broad overview of the endo-sonographic characteristics of solid pancreatic lesions, with detailed descriptions for each pathology and a predictive analysis of the most significant variables for key differential diagnoses. While existing literature touches on this topic, no prior study has analyzed endo-sonographic features with such a large sample size and comprehensive analysis. Our findings can aid clinical practice by optimizing the diagnostic process for solid pancreatic lesions, preventing both false negatives (delayed diagnosis) and false positives (unnecessary surgical intervention), and simultaneously supporting biopsy diagnosis when it is doubtful or inconclusive.