Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2026; 32(1): 113232
Published online Jan 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i1.113232
Published online Jan 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i1.113232
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies and outcomes
| Ref. | Setting | Intervention | Control | Indication | Patients | Age | Female | PEP | |||
| Overall | Mild | Moderate | Severe | ||||||||
| Romano-Munive et al[50], 2021, Mexico | Multicenter, double blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg of rectal indomethacin with 10 mL water | 100 mg of rectal indomethacin with 1:10000 epinephrine dilution (0.1 mg/mL) | Naïve papilla and indication for ERCP | EI = 275 | 50.3 ± 21.4 | 188 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 |
| WI = 273 | 51.8 ± 20.3 | 192 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | |||||
| Patai et al[22], 2017, Hungary | Single-center, double blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg of rectal indomethacin | Placebo | Intact papilla undergoing biliary endoscopic therapy | Indomethacin = 270 | 66.25 | 181 | 18 | 15 | 2 | 1 |
| Placebo = 269 | 64.51 | 181 | 37 | 33 | 3 | 1 | |||||
| Elmunzer et al[35], 2012, United States | Multicenter, single blinded, selected patients | 100 mg of rectal indomethacin suppositories | Placebo | Risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 295 | 44.4 ± 13.5 | 229 | 27 | 14 | 13 | 3 |
| Placebo = 307 | 46.0 ± 13.1 | 247 | 52 | 25 | 27 | 3 | |||||
| Levenick et al[51], 2016, United States | Single-center, single blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg of rectal indomethacin suppositories | Placebo | Patients undergoing ERCP | Indomethacin = 223 | 64.9 | 118 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Placebo = 226 | 64.3 | 118 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Liu et al[52], 2024, China | Single-center, single blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg of rectal indomethacin suppositories | Placebo | Patients undergoing ERCP for bile duct stones | Indomethacin = 58 | 61.6 ± 15.6 | 29 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Placebo = 109 | 62.9 ± 15.2 | 49 | 22 | 11 | 9 | 2 | |||||
| Li et al[53], 2019, China | Single-center, single blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin suppositories | Glycerin suppository | Patients undergoing ERCP for bile duct stones | Indomethacin = 50 | 55.68 ± 13.58 | 31 | 6 | NA | NA | NA |
| Glycerin = 50 | 58.70 ± 13.60 | 37 | 16 | ||||||||
| Mohammad Alizadeh et al[44], 2017, Iran | Single-center, single blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 100 mg diclofenac and 500 mg naproxen | Patients undergoing ERCP | Indomethacin = 122 | 58.0 ± 16.8 | 65 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Diclofenac = 124 | 56.5 ± 18.7 | 66 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Naproxen = 126 | 54.8 ± 13.7 | 66 | 20 | 7 | 8 | 5 | |||||
| Alavinejad et al[32], 2022, multiple countries | Multicenter, single blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 1200 mg oral N-acetyl cysteine, N-acetyl cysteine plus indomethacin, placebo | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 138 | 55.36 | 85 | 24 | 15 | 6 | 3 |
| N-acetyl cysteine = 84 | 57.44 | 49 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | |||||
| N-acetyl cysteine + indomethacin = 115 | 56.11 | 62 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | |||||
| Placebo = 95 | 61.53 | 55 | 19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | |||||
| Guha et al[38], 2023, India | Single-center, single blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | Vigorous hydration | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 174 | 43.7 ± 14.4 | 119 | 5 | NA | 5 | 3 |
| Aggressive hydration = 178 | 44.3 ± 14.7 | 127 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Sotoudehmanesh et al[23], 2007, Iran | Single-center, double blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | Placebo | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 245 | 58.4 ± 17.1 | 134 | 7 | NA | NA | NA |
| Placebo = 245 | 58.1 ± 16.8 | 130 | 15 | ||||||||
| Andrade-Dávila et al[33], 2015, Mexico | Single-center, single blinded, selected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | Glycerin suppository | Risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 82 | 51.59 ± 18.55 | 51 | 4 | 3 | 1 | |
| Glycerin = 84 | 54.0 ± 17.85 | 59 | 17 | 14 | 3 | ||||||
| Qian et al[54], 2022, China | Single-center, double blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | Glycerin suppository | Risk of post-ESWL pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 685 | 46 (35-54) | 194 | 60 | 59 | 1 | 0 |
| Glycerin = 685 | 47 (37-54) | 197 | 84 | 79 | 5 | 0 | |||||
| Wu et al[43], 2023, China | Single-center, single blinded, selected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 0.25 mg of somatostatin indomethacin + somatostatin placebo | Risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 366 | 52.7 ± 14.2 | 196 | 76 | NA | NA | NA |
| Somatostatin = 424 | 49.3 ± 16.6 | 163 | 22 | ||||||||
| Somatostatin + Indomethacin = 420 | 51.9 ± 16.2 | 196 | 22 | ||||||||
| Placebo = 248 | 50.4 ± 15.9 | 116 | 48 | ||||||||
| Döbrönte et al[34], 2014, Hungary | Multicenter, single blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | Placebo | Risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 347 | NA | 214 | 20 | 16 | 4 | NA |
| Placebo = 318 | 212 | 22 | 18 | 4 | |||||||
| Fogel et al[36], 2020, United States | Multicenter, double blinded, selected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 200 mg indomethacin | High risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 515 | 49.3 (15.2) | 392 | 76 | 48 | 28 | NA |
| Placebo = 522 | 50.4 (15) | 421 | 65 | 37 | 28 | ||||||
| Norouzi et al[55], 2023, Iran | Single-center, double blinded, selected patients | 100 mg indomethacin + somatostatin | 100 mg indomethacin + saline | High risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 192 | 63.03 (16.57) | 116 | 22 | 9 | 11 | |
| Control group = 184 | 62.95 (15.58) | 98 | 28 | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| Sadeghi et al[56], 2023, Iran | Single-center, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 100mg indomethacin + vitamin C | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 165 | 59.0 ± 14.4 | 96 | 27 | 19 | 4 | 4 |
| Control group = 165 | 62.0 ± 14.1 | 93 | 17 | 14 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| Kamal et al[57], 2019, United States, India | Multicenter, double blinded, selected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 100 mg indomethacin + 20 mL of 0.02% epinephrine | High risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 482 | 52.16 (14.3) | 275 | 31 | NA | NA | 4 |
| Control group = 477 | 52.56 (15.6) | 276 | 32 | 7 | |||||||
| Elmunzer et al[20], 2024, Canada | Multicenter, double blinded, selected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 100 mg indomethacin + stent | High risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 975 | 55.6 (16.4) | 599 | 145 | 67 | 58 | 20 |
| Control group = 975 | 55.8 (16.3) | 596 | 110 | 52 | 44 | 14 | |||||
| Makhzangy et al[21], 2022, Egypt | Single-center, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 100 mg indomethacin + saline | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 60 | 45.27 ± 15.39 | 29 | 5 | NA | NA | NA |
| Control group = 60 | 42.3 ± 14.28 | 37 | 0 | ||||||||
| Luo et al[58], 2019, China | Multicenter, double blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin + epinephrine | 100 mg indomethacin + saline | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 576 | 62 (50-71) | 281 | 49 | 45 | 4 | NA |
| Control group = 582 | 61 (49-71) | 280 | 31 | 29 | 2 | ||||||
| Hosseini et al[40], 2016, Iran | Single-center, double blinded, selected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 3 L normal saline. Indomethacin + normal saline 2 g glycerin suppositories | Standard indications for ERCP for CBD | Indomethacin = 100 | 51.20 ± 12.12 | 40 | 11 | NA | NA | NA |
| Intravenous saline = 100 | 50.76 ± 13.32 | 53 | 10 | ||||||||
| Normal saline + indomethacin = 101 | 47.91 ± 11.06 | 62 | 0 | ||||||||
| Glycerin = 105 | 49 ± 14.26 | 49 | 17 | ||||||||
| Abdi et al[31], 2024, Iran | Single-center, double blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg indomethacin plus CoQ10 | Indomethacin plus placebo | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 166 | 55.0 ± 13.1 | 92 | 17 | 14 | 2 | 1 |
| Placebo = 166 | 58.0 ± 13.4 | 87 | 25 | 19 | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Mok et al[41], 2017, United States | Single-center, double blinded, selected patients | 100 mg Indomethacin plus normal saline | Normal saline + placebo LR + placebo LR + India | High risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin + normal saline = 48 | 62 | 33 | 6 | NA | NA | 1 |
| Normal saline + placebo = 48 | 58 | 29 | 10 | 0 | |||||||
| LR + placebo = 48 | 58 | 35 | 9 | 0 | |||||||
| LR + indomethacin = 48 | 63 | 23 | 3 | 0 | |||||||
| Sotoudehmanesh et al[59], 2014, Iran | Single-center, double blinded, selected patients | 100 mg indomethacin + dinitrate tablet | 100 mg indomethacin + placebo | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 150 | 58.4 ± 17.8 | 74 | 10 | NA | NA | NA |
| Placebo = 150 | 58.6 ± 17.5 | 80 | 23 | ||||||||
| Wang et al[42], 2020, China | Single-center, double blinded, selected patients | Indomethacin + nitroglycerin | Placebo suppository PSP with placebo suppository + tablet | Standard indications for ERCP only female | Indomethacin = 176 | 66.87 ± 13.04 | 176 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
| Placebo = 176 | 63.5 ± 14.4 | 176 | 34 | 14 | 20 | 0 | |||||
| PSP = 174 | 66.30 ± 12 | 174 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 0 | |||||
| Lai et al[37], 2019, Taiwan | Single-center, double blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg rectal indomethacin pre-ERCP + 100 post | 100 mg rectal indomethacin post-ERCP | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 87 | 60.5 ± 16.9 | 33 | 4 | NA | NA | NA |
| Placebo = 75 | 59.3 ± 15.7 | 28 | 5 | ||||||||
| Sotoudehmanesh et al[60], 2019, Iran | Single-center, double blinded, unselected patients | 100 mg rectal indomethacin + 5 mg isosorbide | 100 mg rectal indomethacin + 5 mg isosorbide + pancreatic duct stent | Standard indications for ERCP | Indomethacin = 207 | 56.8 (17.2) | 120 | 33 | 27 | 6 | NA |
| PSP = 207 | 53.9 (16.8) | 131 | 26 | 22 | 4 | ||||||
| Sperna Weiland et al[61], 2021, Netherlands | Multicenter, double blinded, selected patients | 100 mg rectal diclofenac or indomethacin | 100 mg rectal diclofenac or indomethacin + hydration | Moderate to high risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 425 | 60 (49-71) | 250 | 39 | 29 | 10 | NA |
| Indomethacin + hydration = 388 | 57 (44-71) | 232 | 30 | 27 | 3 | ||||||
| Hatami et al[39], 2018, Iran | Single-center, double blinded, selected patients | 100 mg indomethacin | 10 mL epinephrine (diluted to 1/10000 in saline) epinephrine + indomethacin | High-risk post-ERCP pancreatitis | Indomethacin = 6 | 58.06 ± 17.1 | 27 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| Epinephrine = 68 | 59.59 ± 15.68 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Epinephrine + indomethacin = 58 | 59.62 ± 15.36 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Table 2 Outcome of the studies
| Ref. | Total adverse events | Abdominal pain | Bleeding | Cholangitis | Mortality |
| Romano-Munive et al[50], 2021, Mexico | EI = 40 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 2 |
| WI = 41 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 6 | |
| Patai et al[22], 2017, Hungary | Indomethacin = 30 | NA | 9 | 2 | NA |
| Placebo = 42 | 3 | 2 | |||
| Elmunzer et al[35], 2012, United States | Indomethacin = 4 | NA | 4 | NA | NA |
| Placebo = 9 | 7 | ||||
| Levenick et al[51], 2016, United States | Indomethacin = 4 | NA | 4 | NA | 0 |
| Placebo = 6 | 6 | 3 | |||
| Liu et al[52], 2024, China | Indomethacin = NA | NA | NA | NA | 0 |
| Placebo = NA | 1 | ||||
| Guha et al[38], 2023, India | Indomethacin = 11 | 43 | 3 | NA | 3 |
| Placebo = 8 | 40 | 4 | 3 | ||
| Andrade-Dávila et al[33], 2015, Mexico | Indomethacin = 2 | NA | 2 | NA | NA |
| Placebo = 3 | 3 | ||||
| Qian et al[54], 2022, China | Indomethacin = 65 | NA | NA | 5 | NA |
| Placebo = 99 | 13 | ||||
| Wu et al[43], 2023, China | Indomethacin = 62 | NA | 45 | NA | 2 |
| Somatostatin = 21 | 18 | 3 | |||
| Somatostatin + indomethacin = 25 | 21 | ||||
| Placebo = 43 | 30 | ||||
| Fogel et al[36], 2020, United States | Indomethacin = 6 | NA | 6 | NA | NA |
| Placebo = 8 | 8 | ||||
| Kamal et al[57], 2019, United States, India | Indomethacin = 6 | NA | 0 | NA | 3 |
| Placebo = 8 | 10 | 3 | |||
| Luo et al[58], 2019, China | Indomethacin = 42 | NA | 4 | 8 | |
| Placebo = 44 | 6 | 9 | |||
| Mok et al[41], 2017, United States | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2 |
| 1 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 1 | |||||
| Sotoudehmanesh et al[59], 2014, Iran | NA | 1 | NA | NA | NA |
| 2 | |||||
| Wang et al[42], 2020, China | NA | NA | 4 | 4 | NA |
| 6 | 8 | ||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||
| Sperna Weiland et al[61], 2021, Netherlands | Indomethacin = 30 | NA | NA | NA | 12 |
| Indomethacin + hydration = 24 | 11 |
Table 3 Results of the subgroup analysis of multivariance analysis outcomes
| Outcomes | Studies | RR | 95%CI | P value | Heterogeneity |
| Age > 40 years | 13 | 0.79 | 0.59-1.05 | 0.10 | 62% |
| Female patients | 14 | 0.80 | 0.60-1.07 | 0.13 | 56% |
| Prior cholecystectomy | 4 | 0.42 | 0.24-0.71 | < 0.01 | 0% |
| History of pancreatitis | 7 | 0.67 | 0.47-0.95 | 0.03 | 0% |
| Difficult cannulation | 11 | 0.62 | 0.44-0.89 | < 0.01 | 59% |
| Pancreatic sphincterotomy | 9 | 0.29 | 0.18-0.46 | < 0.01 | 25% |
| Biliary sphincterotomy | 7 | 0.85 | 0.74-0.99 | 0.03 | 0% |
| Trainee involvement | 6 | 1.79 | 0.89-3.60 | 0.10 | 84% |
| Pancreatic duct stent | 6 | 1.41 | 1.19-1.67 | < 0.01 | 0% |
- Citation: Tian F, Huang ZC, Khizar H, Qiu K. Efficacy of indomethacin for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(1): 113232
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i1/113232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i1.113232
