Published online Jan 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i1.113232
Revised: September 3, 2025
Accepted: September 30, 2025
Published online: January 7, 2026
Processing time: 139 Days and 0.7 Hours
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is a prevalent and potentially serious complication in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
To comprehensively assess the efficacy of indomethacin therapy in reducing PEP risk.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared rectal indomethacin with a control group to prevent PEP. Duplicates were removed, and studies were included based on the established inclusion criteria. We used the Cochrane Colla
We included a total of 30 RCTs involving 16977 patients. Compared to the control group, rectal indomethacin showed comparable rates of overall PEP (PEP; RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.69-1.04, I2 = 79%) with no statistically significant difference of RR in mild (RR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.74-1.14), moderate (RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.59-1.02), or severe PEP (RR = 1.12, 95%CI: 0.75-1.67). There was also no difference in cases of adverse events (RR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.69-1.35), abdominal pain (RR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.80-1.62), bleeding (RR = 1.07, 95%CI: 0.70-1.63), or mortality (RR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.56-1.33) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses were also performed.
Rectal indomethacin appears to be safe and may offer benefit in selected high-risk patients, though findings should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity.
Core Tip: This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of rectal indomethacin in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by reviewing the results of 30 randomized controlled trials. Indomethacin didn’t show a significant reduction in overall post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis rates or adverse events relative to controls, however, it may be beneficial in particular high-risk patients, but with caution given to significant heterogeneity in the results.
