Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2025; 31(44): 112719
Published online Nov 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i44.112719
Published online Nov 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i44.112719
Table 1 Characteristics of patients with hepatitis B surface antigen positive compared with patients with hepatitis B surface antigen negative after retreatment, n (%)
| Characteristic | Total patients (n = 135) | HBSP (n = 107) | HBSN (n = 28) | P value |
| Age (years), median (Q1, Q3) | 40.00 (35.00, 46.00) | 40.00 (35.00, 47.00) | 38.50 (35.75, 41.00) | 0.311 |
| Male | 100 (74.07) | 80 (74.77) | 20 (71.43) | 0.720 |
| BMI (kg/m2), median (Q1, Q3) | 24.70 (22.80, 26.60) | 24.75 (23.02, 26.78) | 24.70 (22.35,25.90) | 0.388 |
| HBV family history | 0.203 | |||
| No | 59 (44.70) | 44 (41.90) | 15 (55.56) | |
| Yes | 73 (55.30) | 61 (58.10) | 12 (44.44) | |
| Smoke history | 0.836 | |||
| No | 38 (65.52) | 30 (63.83) | 8 (72.73) | |
| Yes | 20 (34.48) | 17 (36.17) | 3 (27.27) | |
| Drink history | 0.848 | |||
| No | 49 (84.48) | 39 (82.98) | 10 (90.91) | |
| Yes | 9 (15.52) | 8 (17.02) | 1 (9.09) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1.000 | |||
| No | 125 (94.70) | 99 (94.29) | 26 (96.30) | |
| Yes | 7 (5.30) | 6 (5.71) | 1 (3.70) | |
| Hypertension | 0.881 | |||
| No | 116 (87.88) | 93 (88.57) | 23 (85.19) | |
| Yes | 16 (12.12) | 12 (11.43) | 4 (14.81) | |
| Cirrhosis | 0.362 | |||
| No | 102 (75.56) | 79 (73.83) | 23 (82.14) | |
| Yes | 33 (24.44) | 28 (26.17) | 5 (17.86) | |
| First circle Peg-IFNα treatment relative | ||||
| Combination of NAs | < 0.001 | |||
| No | 8 (5.93) | 2 (1.87) | 6 (21.43) | |
| Yes | 127 (94.07) | 105 (98.13) | 22 (78.57) | |
| Type of NAs | 0.001 | |||
| No | 8 (5.93) | 2 (1.87) | 6 (21.43) | |
| ETV | 29 (21.48) | 27 (25.23) | 2 (7.14) | |
| TDF | 49 (36.29) | 39 (36.45) | 10 (35.72) | |
| TAF | 40 (29.63) | 32 (29.91) | 8 (28.57) | |
| Combine | 9 (6.67) | 7 (6.54) | 2 (7.14) | |
| Baseline HBsAg level of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL), median (Q1, Q3) | 3.23 (2.84, 3.59) | 3.32 (2.98, 3.71) | 2.92 (2.30, 3.18) | < 0.001 |
| HBsAg level at week 12 of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL), median (Q1, Q3) | 3.03 (2.35, 3.39) | 3.14 (2.67, 3.49) | 1.83 (0.87, 2.75) | < 0.001 |
| HBsAg level at end of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL), median (Q1, Q3) | 2.55 (1.44, 3.16) | 2.72 (1.82, 3.30) | 0.93 (0.30, 1.87) | < 0.001 |
| HBsAg decline at week 12 of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL), median (Q1, Q3) | 0.21 (0.07, 0.62) | 0.15 (0.03, 0.36) | 0.84 (0.32, 1.19) | < 0.001 |
| HBsAg decline at end of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL), median (Q1, Q3) | 0.65 (0.30, 1.42) | 0.50 (0.28, 0.93) | 1.64 (0.72, 1.97) | < 0.001 |
| HBsAg decline at end of initial treatment (%), median (Q1, Q3) | 0.78 (0.05, 0.96) | 0.69 (0.46, 0.88) | 0.98 (0.81, 0.99) | < 0.001 |
| HBeAg | 0.542 | |||
| Negative | 98 (73.13) | 77 (71.96) | 21 (77.78) | |
| Positive | 36 (26.87) | 30 (28.04) | 6 (22.22) | |
| HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL), median (Q1, Q3) | -3.00 (-3.00, 3.17) | -3.00 (-3.00, 3.04) | 2 .00 (-3.00, 3.39) | 0.323 |
| ALT (U/L), median (Q1, Q3) | 25.50 (19.00, 42.50) | 25.00 (17.00, 40.00) | 31.70 (19.00, 45.00) | 0.277 |
| AST (U/L), median (Q1, Q3) | 22.50 (18.00, 29.00) | 22.00 (18.00, 29.00) | 24.00 (18.00, 29.00) | 0.878 |
| GGT (U/L), median (Q1, Q3) | 24.00 (17.00, 38.75) | 24.00 (16.25, 39.75) | 24.00 (17.00, 35.00) | 0.928 |
| TBIL (μmol/L), median (Q1, Q3) | 16.40 (13.00, 21.63) | 16.85 (13.28, 22.02) | 15.25 (11.38,17.70) | 0.064 |
| ALB (g/L), median (Q1, Q3) | 48.40 (46.75, 49.95) | 48.15 (46.55, 50.00) | 48.90 (47.80, 49.80) | 0.319 |
| PLT (109/L), median (Q1, Q3) | 194.00 (164.25, 236.25) | 197.00 (166.00, 238.00) | 189.00 (165.00, 212.00) | 0.445 |
| AFP (IU/mL), median (Q1, Q3) | 2.68 (1.89, 4.58) | 2.76 (1.89, 4.63) | 2.51 (2.10, 4.25) | 0.637 |
| LSM (kPa), median (Q1, Q3) | 7.60 (6.00, 9.80) | 7.70 (6.17, 9.80) | 6.46 (5.65, 9.20) | 0.184 |
| CAP (dB/m), median (Q1, Q3) | 249.00 (231.00, 276.20) | 256.00 (232.00, 278.00) | 239.00 (228.75, 254.25) | 0.037 |
| Second circle Peg-IFNα treatment relative | ||||
| HBsAg level at retreatment baseline (log10 IU/mL), median (Q1, Q3) | 2.53 (1.67, 3.12) | 2.81 (2.02, 3.31) | 0.89 (-0.28, 2.31) | < 0.001 |
| Rebound magnitude of HBsAg at retreatment baseline compared to end of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL), median (Q1, Q3) | 0.00 (-0.14, 0.19) | 0.00 (-0.10, 0.16) | -0.03 (-0.54, 0.32) | 0.433 |
| Rebound magnitude of HBsAg at retreatment baseline compared to end of initial treatment (%), median (Q1, Q3) | 0.00 (-0.06, 0.07) | 0.00 (-0.04, 0.07) | -0.15 (-0.96, 0.08) | 0.027 |
| Rebound magnitude of HBsAg at retreatment baseline compared to baseline of initial treatment (%), median (Q1, Q3) | -0.20 (-0.43, -0.09) | -0.17 (-0.29, -0.08) | -0.63 (-1.10, -0.30) | < 0.001 |
| The interval weeks between the two treatments (weeks), median (Q1, Q3) | 23.40 (15.00, 39.85) | 20.70 (15.00, 32.95) | 36.40 (16.20, 86.17) | 0.015 |
| 1st Peg-IFN treatment course (weeks), median (Q1, Q3) | 48.00 (36.00, 58.70) | 48.00 (36.00, 55.35) | 39.40 (27.65, 51.50) | 0.824 |
| 2nd Peg-IFN treatment course (weeks), median (Q1, Q3) | 28.00 (21.25, 44.75) | 26.05 (19.02, 43.30) | 30.00 (19.55, 47.00) | 0.016 |
| Total follow-up time (weeks), median (Q1, Q3) | 147.60 (126.30, 182.05) | 155.10 (131.60, 182.05) | 134.95 (116.75, 178.78) | 0.181 |
Table 2 Univariate Cox regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and multivariate Cox regression analysis of factors associated with hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving pegylated interferon alpha-2b retreatment
| Characteristic | Univariable | LASSO | Multivariable | ||
| HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | ||
| Age (years) | 0.979 (0.931-1.030) | 0.406 | |||
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 1 | ||||
| Female | 1.185 (0.522-2.690) | 0.685 | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.945 (0.837-1.067) | 0.363 | |||
| HBV family history | |||||
| No | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 0.642 (0.301-1.373) | 0.254 | |||
| Smoke history | |||||
| No | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 0.785 (0.208-2.968) | 0.722 | |||
| Drink history | |||||
| No | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 0.562 (0.072-4.393) | 0.583 | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | |||||
| No | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 0.742 (0.100-5.482) | 0.770 | |||
| Hypertension | |||||
| No | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 1.444 (0.497-4.194) | 0.499 | |||
| Cirrhosis | |||||
| No | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 0.662 (0.252-1.742) | 0.404 | |||
| First circle Peg-IFNα treatment relative | |||||
| Combination of NAs | Yes | 0.022 | |||
| No | 1 | 1 | |||
| Yes | 0.159 (0.064-0.394) | < 0.001 | 0.276 (0.092-0.833) | ||
| Type of NAs | |||||
| No | 1 | ||||
| ETV | 0.056 (0.011-0.280) | < 0.001 | |||
| TDF | 0.198 (0.072-0.546) | 0.002 | |||
| TAF | 0.188 (0.065-0.544) | 0.002 | |||
| Combine | 0.187 (0.038-0.933) | 0.041 | |||
| 1st Peg-IFNα treatment course (weeks) | 1.011 (0.986-1.037) | 0.394 | |||
| Baseline HBsAg level of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL) | 0.472 (0.324-0.686) | < 0.001 | |||
| HBsAg level at week 12 of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL) | 0.433 (0.329-0.569) | < 0.001 | |||
| HBsAg level at end of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL) | 0.474 (0.377-0.594) | < 0.001 | Yes | 1.024 (0.641-1.638) | 0.920 |
| HBsAg decline at week 12 of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL) | 4.043 (2.576-6.343) | < 0.001 | Yes | 1.113 (0.578-2.142) | 0.310 |
| HBsAg decline at end of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL) | 2.450 (1.748-3.434) | < 0.001 | Yes | 2.050 (1.108-3.793) | 0.028 |
| HBsAg decline at end of initial treatment (%) | 27.448 (3.286-29.246) | 0.002 | |||
| HBeAg | |||||
| Negative | 1 | ||||
| Positive | 0.706 (0.285-1.749) | 0.452 | |||
| HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) | 1.047 (0.954-1.148) | 0.333 | |||
| ALT (U/L) | 1.001 (0.999-1.003) | 0.266 | |||
| AST (U/L) | 0.997 (0.989-1.005) | 0.501 | |||
| GGT (U/L) | 1.000 (0.994-1.006) | 0.965 | |||
| TBIL (μmol/L) | 0.989 (0.941-1.040) | 0.670 | |||
| ALB (g/L) | 1.063 (0.921-1.227) | 0.405 | |||
| PLT (109/L) | 0.998 (0.990-1.006) | 0.643 | |||
| AFP (ng/mL) | 0.966 (0.885-1.055) | 0.441 | |||
| LSM (kPa) | 0.919 (0.798-1.059) | 0.244 | |||
| CAP (dB/m) | 0.994 (0.987-1.001) | 0.109 | |||
| The interval weeks between the two treatments (weeks) | 1.010 (1.006-1.014) | < 0.001 | Yes | 1.013 (1.008-1.018) | < 0.001 |
| Second circle Peg-IFNα treatment relative | |||||
| HBsAg level at retreatment baseline (log10 IU/mL) | 0.440 (0.353-0.549) | < 0.001 | Yes | 0.571 (0.410-0.795) | 0.001 |
| Rebound magnitude of HBsAg at retreatment baseline compared to end of initial treatment (log10 IU/mL) | 0.757 (0.658-0.872) | < 0.001 | |||
| Rebound magnitude of HBsAg at retreatment baseline compared to end of initial treatment (%) | 0.682 (0.448-1.037) | 0.073 | |||
| Rebound magnitude of HBsAg at retreatment baseline compared to baseline of initial treatment (%) | 0.179 (0.107-0.300) | < 0.001 | |||
| Model parameter | λ = 0.054 | ||||
- Citation: Fu YC, Li J, Wang JY, Zhang YW, Yan F, Chen J, Du Q, Yang C, Liang J, Ye Q, Xiang HL. Retreatment hepatitis B surface antigen clearance prediction model identifies pegylated interferon alpha candidates in chronic hepatitis B. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(44): 112719
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i44/112719.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i44.112719
