BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2025; 31(39): 111300
Published online Oct 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i39.111300
Table 1 Variables, formulas, and interpretation for each score
Score
Type
Parameters used
Formula/cutoffs
Clinical interpretation
New Clichy ScoreClinical/Laboratory-basedBilirubin, INR, creatinine, ascites, encephalopathyWeighted scoring system; score > 2 indicates poor prognosisStratifies diseases severity; guides timing of intervention
BCS-TIPS IndexClinical/Laboratory-basedBilirubin, INR, creatinine, ageScore = (1.03 × creatinine) + (0.8 × bilirubin) + (0.8 × INR) + (0.3 × age); > 7 Leads to poor outcomePredicts survival after TIPS
Zeitoun ScoreClinical/Laboratory-basedINR, bilirubin, ascitesCategorical system: Class I (mild) to Class III (severe)Assesses prognosis pre-TIPS
PELD ScoreClinical/Laboratory-based (pediatrics)Albumin, bilirubin, INR, growth failure, ageStandard UNOS formula; higher scores correlate with worse outcomesUsed for pediatric LT prioritization
Imaging parametersImaging-based (proposed/research)HV patency, caudate lobe hypertrophy, hepatic congestion signsStandard UNOS formula; higher scores correlate with worse outcomesNot part of current scores; proposed for future integration
Table 2 Comparison and limitations of prognostic scoring systems in Budd-Chiari syndrome
Feature
New Clichy Score
BCS-TIPS Index
Zeitoun Score
PELD Score
PopulationPrimarily validated in adult patients with BCSSpecifically designed for adult patients with BCS who have undergone a TIPS procedureDeveloped for adult patients with BCSDesigned for pediatric patients (< 12 years old) with end-stage liver disease awaiting LT
PredictorsAscites score, Child-Pugh score, age, serum creatinine, clinicopathological form III (acute on chronic)Age, serum total bilirubin, INRAge, response of ascites to diuretics, Child-Pugh score, serum creatinineAge (< 1 year), albumin, bilirubin (total), INR, growth failure
Cutoff≥ 3.75 for predicting 1-year outcomes< 7 indicates excellent 1-year survival (96%); ≥ 7 indicates high-risk≤ 5.4 indicates good prognosis; > 5.4 indicates poor prognosis≥ 15 indicates high risk of death without LT in chronic liver disease
LimitationsPrimarily validated in a specific Egyptian cohort; generalizability needs confirmation. Overall survival predictionPredicts survival specifically post-TIPS but not overall BCS survival. Generalizability may vary; did not predict 1-year shunt patency in one studyFocused on overall survival; impact of specific interventions like shunts uncertain in the original studyPrimarily predicts pre transplant mortality for children < 12 years. Accuracy influenced by unmeasured factors. Not typically used for BCS prognosis