BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Basic Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2025; 31(48): 112653
Published online Dec 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i48.112653
Combined metabolomic and metagenomic analysis reveals inflammatory bowel disease diversity in pediatric and adult patients
Natalya B Zakharzhevskaya, Dmitry A Kardonsky, Elizaveta A Vorobyeva, Olga Y Shagaleeva, Artemiy A Silantyev, Victoriia D Kazakova, Daria A Kashatnikova, Irina V Kolesnikova, Vladimir A Veselovsky, Boris A Efimov, Department of Postgenomics, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow 119435, Russia
Svetlana I Erdes, Ivan S Samolygo, Marina A Manina, Department of Propaedeutics of Children’s Diseases, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119435, Russia
Elena A Belousova, Ekaterina Y Lomakina, Department of Gastroenterology, M.F. Vladimirskiy Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute, Moscow 129110, Russia
Polina V Kondrashova, Department of Gastroenterology, Children’s City polyclinic No. 81 of the Moscow Department of Health, Moscow 117342, Russia
Daria A Kashatnikova, The Laboratory of Ecological Genetics, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia
Tatiana N Kalachnuk, Department of Gastroenterology, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow 119435, Russia
Andrey V Chaplin, Boris A Efimov, Department of Microbiology and Virology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow 117997, Russia
Maria I Markelova, Tatiana V Grigoryeva, Department of Proteomics, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia
Evgenii I Olekhnovich, Maxim D Morozov, Polina Y Zoruk, Daria I Boldyreva, Department of System Biology, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow 119435, Russia
Anna A Vanyushkina, Vladimir Zelman Center for Neurobiology and Brain Rehabilitation, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia
ORCID number: Natalya B Zakharzhevskaya (0000-0003-1045-1895); Elena A Belousova (0000-0003-4523-3337).
Author contributions: Zakharzhevskaya NB, Erdes SI, Belousova ES, Lomakina EY, Kardonsky DA, Kalachnuk TN, and Efimov BA contributed to designing experiments; Samolygo IS, Manina MM, Kondrashova PV, Shagaleeva OY, Silantiev AS, Kazakova VD, Kashatnikova DA, Chaplin AV, Veselovsky VA, Morozov DM, Zoruk PY, Boldyreva DI, Vorobyeva EA, Markelova MI, Grigoryeva TV, Kolesnikova IV, Olekhnovich EI, and Vanyushkina AA contributed to performed the experiments; Vorobyeva EA, Markelova MI, Grigoryeva TV, Kolesnikova IV, Olekhnovich EI, and Vanyushkina AA contributed to analyzed the data; Zakharzhevskaya NB, Erdes SI, Belousova ES., Samolygo IS, and Kardonsky DA contributed to wrote the paper; Zakharzhevskaya NB, Belousova ES, and Efimov BA contributed to supervised the project.
Supported by the IBD-ONCO 25-27 Project, No. R&D 125030703327-1.
Institutional review board statement: All experimental procedures were approved by the local ethical committee of Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, Moscow, Russian Federation, Russia. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, No. 1-IBD/ONCO-2.09.2024.
Institutional animal care and use committee statement: The local ethical committee of Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, Moscow, Russian Federation, hereby confirms that no animal experiments were conducted as part of the scientific and clinical study titled “Development of a Comprehensive Panel of Diagnostic Markers for Verification of Inflammatory and Oncological Bowel Diseases”, No. 2-IBD/ONCO-2.09.2024.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: The genome data supporting the findings of this study are openly available in the NCBI BioProject under accession ID: PRJNA1315228. The metabolome data supporting the findings of this study are openly available in the Mendeley database (Mendeley Data, V1, Available from: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/f6vtf4gpcc/1) [DOI: 10.17632/f6vtf4gpcc.1].
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Natalya B Zakharzhevskaya, PhD, Postdoc, Department of Postgenomics, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Malaya Pirogovskaya, 1A, Moscow 119435, Russia. natazaha@gmail.com
Received: August 4, 2025
Revised: September 9, 2025
Accepted: November 11, 2025
Published online: December 28, 2025
Processing time: 147 Days and 17.8 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

The gut microbiota displays pronounced compositional differences between pediatric and adult populations, both under normal conditions and during the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These structural variations are accompanied by substantial changes in microbial metabolic activity.

AIM

To identify novel early diagnostic biomarkers of IBD, we performed an integrated multi-omics analysis that included assessing microbial community structure and profiling microbial metabolic activity in pediatric and adult cohorts with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD).

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of two distinct age groups with confirmed IBD diagnoses: Adult patients (aged 45 to 70) and pediatric patients (aged 5 to 15), each diagnosed with either CD or UC. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed using the MinION™ Mk1B platform, with data acquisition carried out via MinKNOW software version 22.12.7 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Stool samples were analyzed using a Shimadzu QP2010 Ultra GC/MS system equipped with a Shimadzu HS-20 headspace extractor.

RESULTS

Comparative analysis revealed significant age-related differences in the abundance of Bacteroidota, with pediatric IBD patients showing a lower prevalence compared to adults. Microbial profiling identified Streptococcus salivarius and Escherichia coli as potential biomarkers for assessing IBD risk in children. Furthermore, metagenomic analysis uncovered five microbial signatures with diagnostic potential for CD: Ralstonia insidiosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Erysipelatoclostridium ramosum, Blautia spp., and Coprococcus comes. Using comprehensive metabolomic profiling, we developed and validated novel risk prediction algorithms for pediatric IBD. The CD risk stratification model identifies high-risk patients based on two key biomarkers: An elevated IBD risk coefficient score and reduced levels of 1H-indole-3-methyl. The UC risk prediction model incorporates three metabolic biomarkers indicative of increased disease risk: An elevated risk coefficient score, increased acetate levels, decreased pentanoic acid, and altered excretion of p-cresol (4-methylphenol).

CONCLUSION

Functional metabolomics holds transformative potential for IBD diagnostics across all age groups, with especially significant implications for pediatric patients. The distinct metabolic and metagenetic profiles observed in the pediatric cohort may represent primary alterations in IBD, providing valuable insights for exploring novel mechanisms underlying disease pathogenesis.

Key Words: Headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Inflammatory bowel disease; Crohn’s disease; Ulcerative colitis; Metagenomics; Pediatric and adult patients

Core Tip: Functional metabolomics combines the ability to simultaneously assess the diversity of the microbiome and evaluate its secretory activity in the development of pathologies. In this study, a diagnostic rule was developed for children with inflammatory bowel disease that enables calculation of the risk of disease development. This rule, based on a set of metabolic and metagenomic markers, also helps clarify the specific type of pathology. The combined use of metabolomic and metagenomic analysis will facilitate prompt assessment of the potential risks for developing inflammatory bowel disease in the future and support timely initiation of appropriate therapy.


  • Citation: Zakharzhevskaya NB, Erdes SI, Belousova EA, Samolygo IS, Manina MA, Kondrashova PV, Lomakina EY, Kardonsky DA, Vorobyeva EA, Shagaleeva OY, Silantyev AA, Kazakova VD, Kashatnikova DA, Kalachnuk TN, Kolesnikova IV, Chaplin AV, Markelova MI, Grigoryeva TV, Olekhnovich EI, Veselovsky VA, Morozov MD, Zoruk PY, Boldyreva DI, Vanyushkina AA, Efimov BA. Combined metabolomic and metagenomic analysis reveals inflammatory bowel disease diversity in pediatric and adult patients. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(48): 112653
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i48/112653.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i48.112653

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) represent a major global gastroenterological challenge[1-4]. Within the IBD spectrum, two predominant forms account for most clinical presentations: Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)[5-7]. As chronic, relapsing-remitting disorders, IBDs are fundamentally characterized by persistent mucosal inflammation[8]. IBD pathogenesis involves complex interactions between multiple biological systems that drive intestinal mucosal inflammation, including dysregulated immune responses and genetic predisposition[9-11]. Many theories have been developed about the trigger mechanism of IBD, but the main problem of untimely diagnosis still exists because, in most cases, the IBD can be asymptomatic for a long time[12].

While UC and CD share overlapping histopathological features, the age of onset represents a critical differentiating factor with distinct clinical implications. CD is typically developed in adolescence, although it also occurs in infants compared to the UC[13]. The CD symptoms, which are divided into intestinal and extraintestinal, depend on the severity and its specific location[14]. In children, CD can also cause delays in physical development and sexual maturation[15]. Early onset and lack of pronounced symptoms provoke long-term diagnosis and untimely treatment. In up to 10% of pediatric cases, the distinction between CD and UC is difficult, or the patient is being monitored for a long time with a diagnosis of IBD-unclassified[16]. As the disease progresses, some of these IBD unclassified cases later develop into either CD or UC. Thus, it is important to identify early markers of the development of IBD. On the other hand, it is necessary to investigate new molecular markers of the CD and UC in pediatric and adult patients for a more detailed understanding of the fundamental principles of IBD pathogenesis[17].

While genetic predisposition (e.g., nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2, autophagy-related protein 16-like 1 variants) and autoimmune dysregulation (Th1/Th17 responses) contribute substantially to CD pathogenesis, the gut microbiota plays an equally critical and mechanistically distinct role[18]. The gut microbiota exhibits remarkable responsiveness to intestinal microenvironmental changes through dynamic adaptations and functional alterations[19]. Among the main components, which are actively produced by intestinal bacteria, it is possible to identify short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), vitamins, essential amino acids, components of biotransformation and conjugation of bile acid salts, substances that promote intestinal motility and stimulate intestinal angiogenesis[20-23]. The gut microbial metabolome exhibits profound compositional shifts between homeostasis and IBD, yielding clinically actionable diagnostic signatures[24].

Contemporary multi-omics research has established distinct low-molecular signatures for IBD subtypes. Decreased fecal butyrate, elevated serum kynurenine/tryptophan ratio, and a unique bile acid profile have been observed for CD patients. Increased urinary N-methylhistamine, fecal prostaglandin E2, and plasma lysoPC (16:0) reduction (Area under the curve = 0.89) have been observed in UC patients’ cohorts[25-27]. Strong evidence links IBD pathogenesis to SCFA depletion were also identified[28]. The altered secretory profile in IBD represents a functional consequence of microbial community restructuring.

Functional metabolomics provides a powerful integrative framework for IBD research by simultaneously characterizing microbial community dynamics and bacterial metabolic output profiling[29]. Volatile organic compound (VOC) profiling represents a transformative approach for evaluating microbial metabolic activity[30]. The gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method is used to analyze SCFA, medium-chain and long-chain fatty acids, acids with a phenyl radical, aldehydes, and heterocycles[31]. The vapor-phase extraction method realized by headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS) makes it possible to compare various biological samples, including feces, since the ratios of components in an equilibrium vapor do not depend on the amount of water contained in the samples[32,33]. In this study, we performed a detailed metabolomic analysis of IBD urine samples. We employed a headspace extractor in combination with a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer. This approach enables the analysis of VOCs rather than the complete metabolite profile of urine. Therefore, investigating VOCs transferred into the vapor phase represents a promising method for studying low-molecular-weight compounds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects

Pediatric patients (age range 5-15) with IBD were recruited from the Department of Propaedeutics of Children’s Diseases of the N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Russia. Adult patients (age range 45 to 70) were recruited from the Department of Gastroenterology of the M.F. Vladimirskiy Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute, Russia. All samples were collected between September 2024 to December 2024. Stool samples were collected from all pediatric and adult patients upon admission to the clinic during disease exacerbation. The diagnosis of CD and UC was based on conventional clinical, radiological, and endoscopic features and was finally confirmed by histological examination of intestinal biopsies[34]. The study included an adult IBD group (n = 34), a pediatric IBD group (n = 66), and a healthy control group comprising both adults and children (n = 49). The main criteria for inclusion in the healthy control group were no history of IBD, no recent antibacterial therapy, and no special dietary restrictions. Clinical characteristics of patients with IBD, including indices of disease activity and medication, are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Ethics statement

All experimental procedures were approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, Moscow, Russian Federation, Russia. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

HS-GC-MS

50-100 mg stool samples plus 500 μL water samples were placed into 10 mL screw-cap vials for a Shimadzu HS-20 headspace extractor. 0.2 g of a mixture of salts (ammonium sulphate and potassium dihydrogen phosphate in a ratio of 4:1) was added to increase the ionic strength of the solution. Headspace extractor settings used: Oven temperature 80 °C, sample line temperature 220 °C, transfer line temperature 220 °C, equilibrating time 15 minutes, pressurizing time 2 minutes, load time 0.5 minutes, injection time 1 minute, needle flush time 7 minutes. The vials were sealed and analysed on a Shimadzu QP2010 Ultra GC/MS with a Shimadzu HS-20 headspace extractor, a VF-WAXMS column with a length of 30 m, a diameter of 0.25 mm, and a phase thickness of 0.25 microns. Initial column temperature 80 °C, heating rate 20 °C/minute to 240 °C, exposure 20 minutes. Carrier gas - helium 99.9999, injection mode - spitless, flow rate 1 mL/minute. Ion source temperature -230 °C. Interface temperature 240 °C. The total ionic current monitoring mode was used. To analyse the obtained mass spectra, the National Institute of Standards and Technology 2014 mass spectra library with an automated mass spectral deconvolution and identification system [automated mass spectral deconvolution and identification system (AMDIS) version 2.72] was used. Details of the reagents are provided in Supplementary Table 2-1.

Metabolome data processing

The HS-GC-MS data processing was carried out as follows: Peak areas for selected compounds, calculated using AMDIS, were converted into relative abundance values. The percentage of volatile compounds in each sample was estimated by summing the percentages of compounds confidently identified in the AMDIS database. These sums were then recalculated as a proportion of the total confidently identified compounds to minimize inaccuracies caused by noise and unreliable matrix signals. Subsequent data analysis was performed using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (Available from: http://www.metaboanalyst.ca) and GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 software. Values obtained for each patient were treated as paired and consistent, with outliers identified using the ROUT test (Q = 1%). Since normality could not be confirmed for all sample groups, the raw data were assumed to be non-normally distributed. Therefore, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was applied for initial group comparisons. After applying natural logarithm transformation and normalization, data were further examined using standard t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed P-value below 0.05. To reduce dimensionality and further investigate the dataset, unsupervised principal component analysis was conducted following standard preprocessing steps. A χ2d test guided the choice of imputation method for missing values, revealing that the data met the missing at random (MAR) assumption. Based on this, the Bayesian principal component analysis (BPCA) approach was selected as the optimal imputation technique. Data were then normalized and scaled accordingly. Finally, relationships between metabolites and the composition of gut microbiota were explored using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, calculated with the R “psych” package.

DNA extraction

Fecal samples served as the source for total DNA extraction. Nucleic acids were isolated utilizing the MagicPure® Stool and Soil Genomic DNA Kit in conjunction with the Kingfisher Flex Purification System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, United States), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was subsequently quantified using the Quant-iT dsDNA BR Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, United States) on a Qubit 4 fluorometer.

16S rRNA gene sequencing on the MinION™ platform: Between 1 and 5 ng of the extracted DNA was amplified using primers 27F (AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG) and 1492R (GGTTACCTTGTTAYGACTT) (Eurogen, Novosibirsk, Russia) with the Tersus Plus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Kit (Eurogen, Novosibirsk, Russia) in a total reaction volume of 25 μL. The PCR was carried out under the following conditions: An initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 minutes; followed by 27 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 minute, annealing at 60 °C for 1 minute, and extension at 72 °C for 3 minutes; concluded with a final extension at 72 °C for 2 minutes and cooling at 4 °C. Amplification products were verified by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel. The resulting amplicons were purified using KAPA HyperPure Beads (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Libraries were prepared according to the manufacturer’s protocol (ligation sequencing amplicons) with modifications. Amplicons were processed using the NEBNext® Ultra™ II End Repair/dA-Tailing Module (NEB). Barcodes (Native Barcoding Kit 96 (SQK-NBD109.96)) were ligated using Blunt/TA Ligase Master Mix (NEB). Barcoded libraries were purified using KAPA Pure Beads (Roche, Switzerland). Library concentrations were measured using the Quant-iT dsDNA Assay Kit, High Sensitivity (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, United States), and samples were mixed at equimolar concentrations. The final adapter [Adapter Mix II Expansion (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom)] was ligated to the pooled library using the NEB Next Quick Ligation Module (NEB). The prepared DNA library (12 μL) was mixed with 37.5 μL sequencing buffer, 25.5 μL loading beads, and loaded onto the R10.4.1 flow cell (FLO-MIN114; Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and sequenced using the MinION™ Mk1B. MinKNOW software ver. 24.06.14 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) was used for data acquisition.

Genome data processing

Technical sequences and bases with a quality lower than a Phred score of 9 were processed using Porechop and NanoFilt software[35,36]. The resulting data were evaluated using the Emu pipeline for taxonomic classification[37]. Alpha and beta diversity analyses were performed using the vegan package for GNU/R[38]. Alpha and beta diversity were assessed using the Bioconductor Microbiota Process package for GNU/R. Heatmap visualization was performed using the “pheatmap” package for GNU/R. Alpha diversity studies were performed using the Microbiota Process package[39]. To identify taxa with statistically significant differences in representation between comparison groups, the Maaslin2 v.1.22.0 {with the following thresholds: Minimum abundance = 0.01, minimum prevalence = 0.25, max significance [false discovery rate (FDR)] = 0.05} and LEfSe v.1.1.2 tools were utilized.

RESULTS
Metabolomic profiles of IBD in pediatric and adult patients

An HS GC-MS analysis of the volatile compounds was performed for all experimental groups. Raw metabolome data are available in Supplementary Table 2-2. A minimum of 60% of the stable compounds identified were utilized for the metabolomic profile comparison. The most frequently observed compounds that met the screening criteria are presented in Table 1. Among the identified compounds, SCFAs, medium- and long-chain fatty acids, and amino acid derivatives were observed. This investigation employed comprehensive volatile metabolomic profiling to characterize pediatric IBDs, with particular focus on CD. At the first stage, a verification metabolomic analysis was carried out, which allowed for to identification of the spectrum of compounds in pediatric and adult IBD groups compared to the control. Based on the data obtained, the profile of all detectable (Figure 1A and B) and stably detectable (Figure 1C and D) metabolites revealed in the IBD group was significantly different from that of the control group. The same result was obtained in the IBD adult group, either for all (Supplementary Figure 1A and B) or for stable metabolites (Supplementary Figure 1C and D). The formation of metabolome profile diversity in the pediatric IBD group indicates significant disturbances in the intestinal microbiota of patients with UC and CD. Patients with IBD typically have reduced microbiota diversity, which should result in a reduction in the number of identified metabolites.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Total headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data obtained for inflammatory bowel disease and control groups of pediatric patients. A and B: Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis data represent two independent groups of samples [inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) kids and control kids] according to the relative concentration of all detected volatile compounds; C and D: Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis data represent two independent groups of samples (IBD kids and control kids) according to the relative concentration of stable detected volatile compounds; E: Comparison of volatile organic compound composition for two independent groups of samples (IBD kids and control kids). Relative concentrations in the vapor phase were used. PCA: Principal component analysis; IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease; OPLS-DA: Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis.
Table 1 Complete list of stably detected metabolites in four groups of stool samples. Control kids - control group, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, all kids - inflammatory bowel disease group (Crohn’s disease + ulcerative colitis).
Name
Control kids
CD kids
UC kids
All kids
Acetic acid100.00100.00100.00100.00
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl100.00100.00100.00100.00
Butanoic acid100.00100.00100.00100.00
Pentanoic acid100.00100.00100.00100.00
Propanoic acid100.0097.14100.0099.02
Hexanoic acid96.97100.00100.0099.02
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl100.00100.0097.0699.02
Benzeneacetic acid100.00100.0091.1897.06
n-Hexadecanoic acid100.0091.43100.0097.06
Phenol,2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)81.8294.2997.0691.18
Benzaldehyde93.9477.1494.1288.24
Indole100.0082.8682.3588.24
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl96.9788.5779.4188.24
Phenol, 4-methyl100.0074.2973.5382.35
Benzoic acid90.9171.4382.3581.37
Octanoic acid72.7371.4376.4773.53
Nonanoic acid69.7085.7164.7173.53
Tetradecanoic acid96.9748.5764.7169.61
Heptanoic acid72.7368.5750.0063.73
Benzenepropanoic acid66.6754.2970.5963.73

Contrary to initial expectations, comprehensive metabolomic profiling reveals paradoxical patterns in pediatric IBD. The control group was characterized by a smaller number of diversely represented volatile metabolites than the IBD group (Figure 1E) compared to the adult patients (Supplementary Figure 1E). A wide variety of components in patients with IBD compared to the control group may be associated with the therapy being taken, as well as the presence of excessive bacterial growth, which provokes the secretion of a number of volatile components. In contrast to pediatric patients, adults with chronic IBD demonstrate a more stable metabolomic profile, reflecting long-term adaptation to disease.

To delineate disease-specific metabolic signatures, we conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of UC and CD groups. The principal component analysis and orthogonal projection to latent structures methods were used for metabolite profiles of the CD, UC, and control groups for comparison. As a result, we identified three separate profiles of volatile metabolites for all detected (Figure 2A and B) and stable detected metabolites (Figure 2C and D). As expected, the same result was obtained for adult patients for all detected (Supplementary Figure 2A and B) and for stable detected metabolites (Supplementary Figure 2C and D). The significant metabolomic differences between UC and CD strongly suggest corresponding variations in their underlying microbial ecosystems. Therefore, the heatmap data allow us to identify the entire spectrum of detectable metabolites, where pathologies are characterized by their own profile of volatile compounds for pediatric (Figure 2E) and for adult patients (Supplementary Figure 2E). Moreover, comparative analysis allows us to identify a decrease in the number of detectable metabolites in CD compared to the UC in children. Metabolomic profiling identified treatment-derived xenobiotic metabolites that significantly contribute to the observed metabolic signatures (Figure 2E). However, when assessing stably detectable metabolites, the UC and CD groups significantly differed from the control group.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Total headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data obtained for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and control groups of pediatric patients. A and B: Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis data represent three independent groups of samples [ulcerative colitis (UC) kids, Crohn’s disease (CD)-kids, and control kids] according to the relative concentration of all detected volatile compounds; C and D: Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis data represent three independent groups of samples (UC kids, CD-kids, and control kids) according to the relative concentration of stable detected volatile compounds; E: Comparison of volatile organic compound composition for three independent groups of samples (UC kids, CD-kids, and control kids). Relative concentrations in the vapor phase were used. UC: Ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease; PCA: Principal component analysis; IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease; OPLS-DA: Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis.

Thus, assessing the overall spectrum of detectable metabolites in both groups, it is possible to assess the therapy being carried out and the characteristics of the patients’ diet. Whereas the stably detected metabolites, which are the main metabolites secreted by the microbiota, undergo significant changes in the IBD group (Figure 3A and B). The heatmap indicates a significant spectrum of detectable metabolites in the pediatric group, which are not observed in the adult patients’ group. Based on this comparison, it becomes obvious that pediatric IBD differs significantly from adult IBD (Figure 3C).

Figure 3
Figure 3 Total headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data obtained for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and control groups of pediatric patients. A: Comparison of the volatile organic compound composition of stable detected metabolites for two independent groups of samples (inflammatory bowel disease kids and control kids). Relative concentrations in the vapor phase were used; B: The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used for the primary comparisons between groups, inflammatory bowel disease kids, and Control kids. Statistical significance was determined by a two-sided P-value of less than 0.05. False discovery rate correction was also applied; C: Comparison of the volatile organic compound composition of stable detected metabolites for three independent groups of samples (ulcerative colitis kids, Crohn’s disease kids, and control kids). Relative concentrations in the vapor phase were used; D: The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used for the primary comparisons between groups: Ulcerative colitis kids, Crohn’s disease kids, and control kids. Statistical significance was determined by a two-sided P-value of less than 0.05. False discovery rate correction was also applied. UC: Ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease; IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease.

In particular, compounds such as indole, pentanoic acid, phenol, 4-methyl, and 1H-indol-3-methyl characterize the pediatric IBD group (Figure 3D). Indole, pentanoic acid, phenol, 4-methyl, and acetic acid discriminate UC and control groups, while 1H-Indol, 3-methyl can be used for CD diagnostics in the pediatric group (Figure 3D). The main metabolome differences detected for the adult IBD and control group were the following: Phenol,2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl), indole, pentanoic acid, N-hexadecanoic acid, and tetradecanoic acid (Supplementary Figure 3A and B). Metabolites such as hexadecane, indole, pentanoic acid, and phenol,2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl), determined the difference between patients with UC and the control group. On the other hand, metabolites such as N-hexadecanoic acid and phenol determined the difference between patients with CD and the control group in adults (Supplementary Figure 3C and D).

CD and UC are long-term diseases, while the onset of CD is in childhood. However, long-term disease leaves an indelible mark on the microbiota diversity and its secretory activity. The overall spectrum of metabolites detected in pediatric and adult IBD groups was different, as expected (Figure 4A-C). The following metabolites were found to be different in two age variants of IBD: N-hexadecanoic acid and phenol,2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) (Figure 4D). The onset of CD occurs in childhood, so special attention was paid to comparing CD patients of different ages. Based on metabolomic profiling data, pediatric CD differs from adult CD and forms a separate metabolite profile (Figure 5A).

Figure 4
Figure 4 Total headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data obtained for the inflammatory bowel disease group of pediatric and adult patients. A and B: Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis data represent two independent groups of samples [inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-kids, IBD-adults] according to the relative concentration of all detected volatile compounds; C: Comparison of volatile organic compound composition for two independent groups of samples (IBD-kids, IBD-adults). Relative concentrations in the vapor phase were used; D: The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used for the primary comparisons between groups. Statistical significance was determined by a two-sided P-value of less than 0.05. False discovery rate correction was also applied. UC: Ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease; IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Total headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data obtained for Crohn’s disease group of pediatric and adult patients. A: Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis data represent two independent groups of samples [Crohn’s disease (CD)-kids, CD-adults]. According to the relative concentration of all detected volatile compounds; B: The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used for the primary comparisons between groups. Statistical significance was determined by a two-sided P-value of less than 0.05. False discovery rate correction was also applied; C: Box plots the quantitative differences in the relative contents of metabolites detected in the analyzed groups (CD-kids, CD-adults); D: Risk coefficient calculation. UC: Ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease; PCA: Principal component analysis; IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease; OPLS-DA: Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis.

According to the data obtained, pediatric patients had a more consolidated metabolome spectrum than the adult group. Metabolomic profile is more homogeneous in pediatric patients compared to the adult group with CD. It may indicate that there is a special mechanism of CD development compared to the UC that determines its early onset. Whereas CD in adult patients may be caused not only by endogenous but also by exogenous factors, which dramatically change microbiota. In addition to the visual differences identified in the consolidation of the children’s group with CD, it is also possible to identify the spectrum of metabolites that significantly distinguish the two age groups from each other (Figure 5B and C). The obtained difference in the metabolomic profiles of CD patients of different ages should be compared with metagenomic data to assess possible mechanisms of pathogenesis of CD. The metabolome difference between adults and children may be used for identifying familial cases.

In order to make a timely diagnosis, it is necessary to develop a universal method for assessing the risk of developing IBD in children based on metabolic profiling data. Calculating the risk coefficient for the IBD development in the pediatric group is one of the ways to translate relative metabolomic data to the clinical laboratory. Based on the data from the metabolomic profiling, a special algorithm was developed to calculate the risk coefficient for IBD in the pediatric group. The formula for the IBD risk included metabolites that, in combination, are significantly different in groups of patients with IBD vs controls. The main advantage of this testing is the possibility of non-invasive analysis of the secretory activity of the microbiota and frequent monitoring of the intestinal state as much as is required for timely diagnosis of IBD (Figure 5D). For statistically significant metabolites, biserial correlation was calculated with subsequent FDR correction; metabolites with an absolute correlation coefficient |r| > 0.3 were included in the formula: Positively correlated metabolites were placed in the numerator, negatively correlated ones in the denominator. The receiver operating characteristic analysis was then performed to determine risk coefficient thresholds: Values below the 5th percentile indicated absence of risk, while values above the 25th percentile indicated high risk. The upper cutoff threshold for outliers was determined using the interquartile range.

Metagenomic profiles of IBD in pediatric and adult patients

The metagenome study was performed for all experimental and control groups. Sequencing identified 554 microbial species belonging to 224 total genera in 71 experimental fecal samples of pediatric patients and 654 microbial species belonging to 267 total genera in 36 experimental fecal samples of adult patients. Sample metadata is presented in Supplementary Table 3. Raw data and sequencing statistics after quality control are represented in Supplementary Table 4. Relative species abundances and taxonomic tables are presented in additional materials (Supplementary Table 5). The distribution across microbial phyla is presented in Figure 6.

Figure 6
Figure 6 Results of exploratory analysis of gut microbiota diversity in experimental groups (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, and control). A: The most abundant genera in the gut microbiota of patients are presented as a heatmap. Colors denote the relative abundance of species obtained by the emu pipeline after log transformation using pseudo counts. The figure shows the top 90 by relative abundance species. The rows correspond to the samples/patients; the phylum-level taxonomic ranks are denoted with a right color bar. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the Euclidean distance and complete linkage; B: Shannon index distribution of stool samples across experimental groups. Different colors denote different experimental groups. Horizontal brackets show the P-value obtained by comparing corresponding groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test; C: Non-metric multidimensional scaling biplot obtained using taxonomic profiles at the species level of patients’ and healthy controls’ stool samples. Different groups are shown by different color dots. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance analysis results are presented in the lower left corner; D: Bar plots denote the distribution of phylum abundance across experimental groups. The X-axis showed experimental groups, Y-axis showed relative abundance. Different colors show different phyla; E: Bar plots denoted the distribution of genus abundance across experimental groups. The X-axis showed experimental groups, Y-axis showed relative abundance. Different colors show different genera. F: Results of identifying differentially abundant species between ulcerative colitis and coronavirus disease 2019 patient groups using Maalsin2 with the following thresholds: Minimum abundance = 0.01, minimum prevalence = 0.25, maximum significance = 0.05. The Y-axis shows microbial species, the X-axis - the Maaslin2 regression coefficient. Color indicates taxonomic affiliation at the order level for each identified species. aP > 0.05, obtained by comparison corresponded groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. bP > 0.01, obtained by comparison corresponded groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. UC: Ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease; PERMANOVA: Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance; MDS: Multidimensional scaling ordinate; NS: Not significant.

Microbiome analysis revealed significant α-diversity reductions in IBD patients vs healthy controls. Quantitative microbiome analysis demonstrated consistent Firmicutes depletion across all IBD groups (Figure 6A and Supplementary Figure 4A). The taxonomic composition of the children’s gut microbiome shows significant differences between healthy and diseased children, based on alpha diversity expressed as Shannon coefficient and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, indicating that clinical status determines and influences the overall community structure of the gut microbiome in children (Figure 6B and C). The same results were obtained for adult patients (Supplementary Figure 4B and C). Comparative microbiome analysis revealed significantly greater microbial diversity in pediatric vs adult IBD patients across multiple taxonomic levels (Figure 6D and Supplementary Figure 4D).

Metagenomic analysis of pediatric IBD patients revealed several key patterns. Metagenomic analysis revealed distinct phylum-level alterations in pediatric IBD subtypes, including Marked Proteobacteria expansion in the CD group and Significant Bacteroidetes depletion in the UC group. A significant predominance of Bifidobacterium was observed in both patients with UC and CD, which clearly distinguishes both pathologies from the control group. The Escherichia genus was also increased in the CD group compared to the controls and patients with UC. Multiple lines of evidence establish specific Escherichia coli strains as significant CD risk factors[40]. Significant enrichment of Enterococcus and Lactobacillus representatives was observed in the UC group (Figure 6E and Supplementary Figure 4E). It is possible that Enterococcus and Lactobacillus increased as a result of taking a probiotic. Another important feature is a significant decrease in representatives of the genus Akkermansia in patients with UC and CD. It is known that Akkermansia spp. have the ability to restrain autoimmune reactions and reduce proinflammatory cytokines[41].

By analyzing the quantitative representation of individual bacterial species, several metagenomic markers characteristic of CD and UC in children can be identified. Notably, there was a significant increase in the abundance of species such as Ralstonia insidiosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Erysipelatoclostridium ramosum, while a decrease was observed in species like Blautia sp. and Coprococcus comes within the CD group among pediatric patients (Figure 6F). While Ralstonia insidiosa is known as an opportunistic pathogen - particularly in hospital settings - and has been associated with various infections, including those in immunocompromised patients, its direct role in IBD remains unclear[42]. Although IBD is linked to gut microbiome dysbiosis, Ralstonia species, including Ralstonia insidiosa, are not typically among the most studied or implicated bacteria in IBD pathogenesis. There is no direct evidence that Ralstonia insidiosa increases susceptibility to CD; however, both Ralstonia insidiosa and CD patients share a vulnerability to opportunistic infections due to compromised immune systems or disruptions of the body’s natural barriers. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is also considered an opportunistic pathogen, more likely to cause infections in individuals with weakened immune defenses or other health issues. It is known for its resistance to many commonly used antibiotics, which complicates treatment. Colonization with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia can worsen symptoms in IBD patients, potentially leading to increased inflammation, malabsorption, and other complications[43].

Eubacterium ramosum has been detected in both fecal and biopsy samples from IBD patients, particularly those with UC. It has also been identified as a cause of invasive infections in various tissues, especially in immunocompromised individuals, highlighting its potential to cause complications beyond the gut. This bacterium produces an enzyme capable of degrading immunoglobulin A, a crucial antibody in the mucosal lining of the gut. This activity may impair the immune system’s ability to combat other harmful bacteria or pathogens, potentially worsening inflammation in IBD[44]. Blautia is a genus of bacteria commonly found in the human gut, and some species within this genus have been associated with IBD. While several studies report a decrease in Blautia abundance in IBD patients - including those with CD and UC - suggesting a potential protective role, other research indicates a more complex relationship. Some Blautia species may even have beneficial effects; for instance, certain strains produce SCFAs, which are beneficial for gut health, and can modulate immune responses. Experimental studies have shown that specific Blautia strains can alleviate colitis in animal models by reducing inflammation and enhancing gut barrier integrity[45].

Coprococcus, particularly the species Coprococcus comes, has been associated with both the presence and alleviation of IBD[46]. While some studies suggest a potential link between certain Coprococcus species and IBD, others indicate that Coprococcus eutactus, a related species, may exert a protective effect against the disease. It appears to promote anti-inflammatory responses and help restore gut barrier integrity by enhancing goblet cell maturation - cells responsible for mucus production - and by increasing the expression of tight junction proteins. Coprococcus comes is a producer of SCFAs, primarily acetate, which is known for its anti-inflammatory properties[47]. Conversely, antibodies against Coprococcus comes have been found at higher concentrations in individuals with CD compared to healthy controls[48]. Further research is necessary to fully understand the roles of different Coprococcus species in IBD and to evaluate their potential as therapeutic targets.

Quantitative assessment of microbiota species variability in pediatric patients with UC helps identify specific bacterial species that characterize this condition and distinguish it from CD. Notably, patients with UC often exhibit a significant increase in certain Streptococcus species, such as Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus viridans, and Streptococcus sanguinis. Streptococcus salivarius is a common bacterium found in the human oral cavity and gut; some studies suggest it may play a role in IBD, although its exact function remains under investigation. Evidence indicates that Streptococcus salivarius can possess anti-inflammatory properties and modulate immune responses. For example, it has been shown to inhibit the nuclear factor-kappaB pathway in human intestinal epithelial cells in vitro, suggesting potential anti-inflammatory effects[49]. Certain strains, like JIM8772, have demonstrated protective effects in mouse models of colitis, further supporting their possible therapeutic role[50]. Additionally, Streptococcus salivarius may influence immune responses by affecting cytokine production and regulating proliferator-activated receptor gamma transcription activity in intestinal epithelial cells[50]. Increased levels of Streptococcus salivarius have also been observed in the saliva of individuals with IBD, especially those with oral manifestations such as orofacial granulomatosis or oral CD. Conversely, children with colitis show increased abundance of bacteria such as Ruminococcus faecis and Bacteroides ovatus. Ruminococcus faecis is part of the human gut microbiome; although less studied than other Ruminococcus species, some research suggests a potential link between Ruminococcus spp., including Ruminococcus faecis, and IBD. Studies have shown that species like Ruminococcus gnavus and Ruminococcus torques are more prevalent in individuals with IBD and can produce molecules that may contribute to gut inflammation[51]. Bacteroides ovatus is a common gut bacterium that can have both beneficial and potentially harmful effects in IBD. While generally considered a commensal microbe, some studies indicate it can trigger antibody responses in IBD patients. Conversely, other research suggests that Bacteroides ovatus may reduce colitis severity and promote epithelial healing in animal models of IBD[52].

Comparison of the IBD metagenomes occurring in childhood vs adulthood reveals significant differences that characterize the distinct features of disease progression across age groups. Primarily, it is important to note that the intestinal microbiota of children and adults differ markedly, which is entirely normal (Figure 7A and B). Consequently, making direct comparisons between the microbiota of CD -CD-associated colitis in children and adults can be challenging. Nonetheless, certain features related to bacterial diversity involved in the development of IBD in children and adults can still be identified.

Figure 7
Figure 7 Gut microbiome analysis of pediatric and adult patients. А and В: Nonmetric multidimensional scaling based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity; C: Boxplots representing Shannon’s alpha diversity index; D: Bar plots of bacterial family relative abundance. aP < 0.05, assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test. UC: Ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease; NMDS2: Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordinate 2.

In particular, Shannon’s alpha diversity index is significantly lower in children compared to adults (Figure 7C). Reduced bacterial diversity was observed in children across both the control group and the groups with colitis and CD. It is important to note that, during disease development, the microbiomes of children and adults undergo similar changes (Figure 7D). However, significant differences in bacterial species composition are evident between pediatric and adult patients when comparing groups with CD and UC (Figure 7D). Analyzing the species diversity of UC and CD in both children and adult groups reveals that potential biological markers not only distinguish between the disease types but also show an association with age (Figure 8).

Figure 8
Figure 8 Difference between the taxonomic composition of the gut microbiome of pediatric and adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A: Results of identifying differentially abundant species between pediatric and adult inflammatory bowel disease patient groups using Maalsin2 with the following thresholds: Minimum abundance = 0.01, minimum prevalence = 0.25, maximum significance = 0.05; B: Results of identifying biomarker species of pediatric and adult inflammatory bowel disease patient groups using linear discriminant analysis effect size. The colors indicate biomarker species for the studied groups. IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease; LDA: Linear discriminant analysis.

According to the data obtained, Streptococcus salivarius appears to be a universal metagenomic marker characterizing the development of IBD in the pediatric group (log2FoldChange = 3.31, FDR < 0.0001). Similarly, Escherichia coli can also serve as a universal marker for IBD in children, as a significant increase in this bacterial species was observed in both UC (log2FoldChange = 2.45, FDR = 0.049) and CD groups (log2FoldChange = 3.45, FDR = 0.007). However, the expected increase in Escherichia coli was not observed in adult patients with CD. Nonetheless, distinct metagenomic profiles are formed in both CD and UC across adult and pediatric groups, which can be utilized for diagnosis and differential diagnosis (Figure 9).

Figure 9
Figure 9 Difference between taxonomic composition of gut microbiome of paediatric and adult patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. A: Results of identifying differentially abundant species between pediatric and adult ulcerative colitis patient’s groups using Maalsin2 with following thresholds minimum abundance = 0.01, minimum prevalence = 0.25, max significance = 0.05; B: Results of identifying differentially abundant species between pediatric and adult Crohn’s disease patient’s groups using Maalsin2 with following thresholds minimum abundance = 0.01, minimum prevalence = 0.25, maximum significance = 0.05; C: Results of identifying biomarker species of pediatric and adult controls, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease patient’s groups using linear discriminant analysis effect size. The colors indicate biomarker species for the studied groups. UC: Ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease; LDA: Linear discriminant analysis.
Functional metabolomics results

Correlation analysis enables the evaluation of certain aspects of functional metabolomics, which can be applied to identify differential markers distinguishing CD and UC in children and adults. Notably, pediatric patients with CD are characterized by an increased level of tetradecanoic acid and quantitative changes in several microorganisms, including Bacteroides eggerthii, Bacteroides cellulosilyticus, Alistipes putredinis, Barnesiella intestinihominis, and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (Figure 10A). Another marker associated with co-directional correlation is butyrate and propionate derivatives, which increase in tandem with changes in bacteria such as Prevotella copri, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, and others. Escherichia coli, a well-known risk factor associated with CD, shows an inverse correlation with benzoic acid levels. In the pediatric group with UC, a high abundance of Streptococcus salivarius was observed. Interestingly, the content of Streptococcus salivarius is inversely proportional to the level of heptanoic acid (Figure 10B). Most members of the genus Streptococcus exhibit an inverse relationship with heptanoic acid levels. Notably, heptanoic acid has been found to be reduced in patients with IBD.

Figure 10
Figure 10  Spearman correlation between metabolite levels and relative abundance of microbial species. P < 0.05. A: Crohn’s disease; B: Ulcerative colitis; C: Shannon’s index diversity of metabolites in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease groups. UC: Ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease.

Studies suggest that alterations in gut microbiota composition and decreased fermentation of dietary fibers in IBD can lead to changes in SCFAs, including heptanoic acid. Although the precise mechanisms are still under investigation, SCFAs are known to play crucial roles in regulating immune responses and promoting tissue repair within the gut. Significant amounts of Blautia bacteria (Blautia faecis, Blautia glucerasea, Blautia obeum, Blautia luti) positively correlate with levels of various propionate derivatives, which can also serve as markers for differential diagnosis between UC and CD. Additionally, the correlation analysis reveals notable differences in the microbiota structure of children and adults with CD and UC. Specifically, when comparing pediatric and adult CD groups, opposite trends are observed in several compounds and bacterial species. For example, propionate and acetate do not show significant correlation with bacterial species numbers in the pediatric CD group; however, in adults, correlations are evident, indicating a decline in the activity of bacteria responsible for producing SCFAs.

Summarizing the correlation data, it is evident that there is considerable variability in the Shannon diversity index for SCFAs in UC compared to CD (Figure 10C). This finding is particularly intriguing when considering the potential mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of these two IBDs. The extensive microbiota alterations observed at early stages of UC may suggest a broader range of pathogenic factors influencing its onset and progression. In contrast, CD - both in childhood and adulthood - is characterized by a more limited spectrum of metabolic and metagenomic changes, which may enhance the prospects for identifying specific pathognomonic factors responsible for its development.

DISCUSSION

IBDs are polyetiological conditions that develop as a result of the influence of numerous exogenous and endogenous factors[53]. Among these, the most common are UC and CD. Although both conditions can manifest at different ages, CD is more frequently diagnosed during childhood and adolescence[54]. Nonetheless, both pathologies are extremely challenging to diagnose accurately and differentiate from each other[55]. Despite the extensive data currently available on genetic predispositions and independent markers associated with disease activity, there remains a need to identify new determinants that could enable timely targeted interventions. Laboratory tests today can help assess the risk of developing IBD[56], but they are typically used only when specific symptoms appear. Common clinical manifestations include diarrhea, weight loss, nausea, and blood in the stool, among others[57]. Importantly, long before these symptoms become evident, the intestinal microbiota - the body’s primary sensor - reacts to changes within the gut environment. Microorganisms adapt to inflammatory conditions in CD and UC by altering their diversity and metabolic activity[58]. These microbial adaptations involve shifts in bacterial community composition and changes in the secretion levels of certain metabolites[59]. Therefore, analyzing microbial presence and their secretory activity offers a promising approach for monitoring disease progression and improving early diagnosis and differential diagnosis of IBD. It is important to recognize that both conditions have a chronic course, often beginning early in life and persisting into adulthood with alternating periods of exacerbation and remission[60]. Studying microbiome diversity in adult patients reflects the established equilibrium of bacterial communities resulting from long-standing inflammation[61]. Consequently, investigating microbiome dynamics in young patients is especially crucial for understanding disease pathogenesis and identifying effective diagnostic markers.

It is well established that the microbiota of children and adults differ significantly[62]. Therefore, the response to inflammatory processes in children will directly influence the composition of their microbiota and the secretory activity of bacteria. The objectives of this study were to comprehensively assess the metagenomic and metabolomic diversity of molecular markers characteristic of early CD and UC, as well as their later stages. Stool samples were collected from patients, as this is the most convenient option not only for initial diagnosis but also for subsequent monitoring of the inflammatory process.

Based on the obtained metabolomic data, it is possible to identify distinct profiles of inflammatory diseases when compared to controls, in both children and adults. Thus, in both age groups, the secretory activity of bacteria and overall enzymatic processes in the human body undergo significant changes during the development of inflammatory diseases. When comparing pediatric patients with IBD to healthy controls, several metabolites were found to be significantly altered: Indole, pentanoic acid, phenol, 4-methyl, and 1H-indole-3-methyl. Notably, when assessing differential differences between disease groups, the indole derivative 1H-indole-3-methyl showed significant variation between CD and UC. Importantly, indole levels were significantly reduced across the entire IBD group and within individual analyses of CD and UC patients, a finding supported by several studies[63]. This consistent decrease indicates a diminished presence of bacteria actively producing and secreting indole, reflecting microbiota alterations associated with these conditions.

It is well established that the gut microbiome plays a crucial role in tryptophan metabolism, producing various indole derivatives that can influence the host’s immune response and intestinal health[64]. It has been previously demonstrated that indole metabolites produced by gut microbiota play a crucial role in maintaining intestinal health and modulating immune responses, with significant implications for IBD, including CD, in both adults and children[65]. A retrospective study of pediatric patients diagnosed with CD further confirms the high diagnostic value of volatile metabolite analysis, including indole. This approach proves useful for assessing the extent of intestinal mucosal changes and disease activity, especially when combined with other metagenomic indicators[66].

1H-indole-3-methyl is a naturally occurring compound found in the gut that results from tryptophan metabolism. While it is not directly implicated as a causative factor for CD, it is known that skatole (3-methylindole) can enhance promoter activity of cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, increasing IL-6 mRNA expression and protein secretion. The ability of skatole to elevate IL-6 and TNF-α levels may significantly influence the development and progression of IBD[67].

Unlike CD, UC also exhibits characteristic changes in the levels of pentanoic acid, 4-methylphenol (p-cresol), and acetate. Gut bacteria produce SCFAs like pentanoic acid as byproducts of digesting dietary fiber. These changes in SCFA profiles are considered potential indicators of dysbiosis and may reflect early microbial and metabolic disturbances linked to disease onset and progression. In UC, alterations in gut microbiota composition can affect SCFA production. Similar alterations in the composition of SCFAs have been observed in numerous studies focused on identifying molecular markers associated with the risk of developing UC[68]. Research suggests that pentanoic acid, along with other SCFAs, may play a role in regulating intestinal inflammation and potentially influence UC severity[68]. Studies have shown that increased levels of pentanoic acid and other SCFAs are associated with a reduction in UC symptoms[23]. Therefore, similar to indole, the concentration of pentanoic acid decreases with the development of IBDs. As demonstrated in this study, this decrease appears to be more characteristic of UC than CD.

Although metabolomic analysis can identify individual disease markers in clinical practice, applying these results is often challenging. For this reason, it is optimal to develop an assessment metric that allows evaluation of IBD risk in children, considering that IBD can manifest at this age. A formula incorporating phenol, 4-methylpentanoic acid, and indole can be used to calculate a risk coefficient for developing IBD. A coefficient value less than or equal to 4.01 indicates no IBD risk. Values between 4.01 and 4.79 suggest a low risk; however, additional clinical markers should be considered to clarify the diagnosis. A coefficient above 4.79 indicates a high risk of IBD and strongly recommends further examination, which can also detect asymptomatic cases. Moreover, in cases with a high-risk coefficient, 1H-indole-3-methyl can serve as a marker for differential diagnosis and assessing the risk of CD. Conversely, levels of pentanoic acid, phenol 4-methyl, and acetate can be used for differential diagnosis to assess the risk of developing UC.

Metagenomic data, especially when combined with metabolomic data, can significantly enhance the accuracy of diagnostics. However, as demonstrated, there is no need to sequence the entire metagenome for routine IBD diagnosis. Instead, focus can be placed on developing PCR-based tests to quantify specific microorganisms that characterize IBDs in general and enable differential diagnosis between CD and UC. Studies have indicated that Streptococcus salivarius and Escherichia coli may serve as potential microbial markers for assessing the risk of developing IBD in children, a finding that is supported by several research investigations[69]. These bacteria are often associated with dysbiosis observed in pediatric IBD and could potentially aid in early diagnosis or risk stratification. Importantly, this study conducted metagenomic analyses on older patients, thereby identifying bacterial differences that characterize pathologies developing during childhood. Specifically, in pediatric CD patients, a significant increase was observed in bacteria such as Ralstonia insidiosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Erysipelatoclostridium ramosum, while a decrease was noted in species like Blautia spp. and Coprococcus comes. Functional metabolomics testing can also be useful for diagnosing IBD in adults, particularly when the disease is initially identified. However, it is crucial to recognize that the spectrum of metabolic and metagenomic differences at disease onset may differ substantially from those observed during later stages or established pathology.

CONCLUSION

Functional metabolomics combines the ability to simultaneously assess the diversity of the microbiome and evaluate its secretory activity in the development of pathologies. When evaluating IBDs in children and adults, it is important to consider differences in bacterial community composition and, consequently, their secretory activity, which are reflected in the overall profile of potential diagnostic markers. In this study, a diagnostic rule was developed for children with IBD that enables calculation of the risk of disease development. This rule, based on a set of metabolic and metagenomic markers, also helps clarify the specific type of pathology. The combined use of metabolomic and metagenomic analysis will facilitate prompt assessment of the potential risks for developing IBD in the future and support timely initiation of appropriate therapy.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: Russia

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B

P-Reviewer: Alshimerry AF, PhD, Assistant Professor, Iraq; Li P, MD, PhD, Chief Physician, Director, Professor, Senior Researcher, China S-Editor: Bai SR L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang L

References
1.  Burisch J, Munkholm P. The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:942-951.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 225]  [Cited by in RCA: 252]  [Article Influence: 25.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Cosnes J, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P, Cortot A. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1785-1794.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1390]  [Cited by in RCA: 1590]  [Article Influence: 113.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
3.  Ng SC, Bernstein CN, Vatn MH, Lakatos PL, Loftus EV Jr, Tysk C, O'Morain C, Moum B, Colombel JF; Epidemiology and Natural History Task Force of the International Organization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IOIBD). Geographical variability and environmental risk factors in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2013;62:630-649.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 470]  [Cited by in RCA: 449]  [Article Influence: 37.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Thia KT, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Yang SK. An update on the epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Asia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:3167-3182.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 371]  [Cited by in RCA: 409]  [Article Influence: 24.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
5.  Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ. Crohn's disease. Lancet. 2012;380:1590-1605.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1347]  [Cited by in RCA: 1559]  [Article Influence: 119.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Ordás I, Eckmann L, Talamini M, Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2012;380:1606-1619.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1151]  [Cited by in RCA: 1616]  [Article Influence: 124.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
7.  Kappelman MD, Rifas-Shiman SL, Kleinman K, Ollendorf D, Bousvaros A, Grand RJ, Finkelstein JA. The prevalence and geographic distribution of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1424-1429.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 683]  [Cited by in RCA: 698]  [Article Influence: 38.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
8.  Knights D, Lassen KG, Xavier RJ. Advances in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: linking host genetics and the microbiome. Gut. 2013;62:1505-1510.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 323]  [Cited by in RCA: 352]  [Article Influence: 29.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Yu YR, Rodriguez JR. Clinical presentation of Crohn's, ulcerative colitis, and indeterminate colitis: Symptoms, extraintestinal manifestations, and disease phenotypes. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2017;26:349-355.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 135]  [Cited by in RCA: 244]  [Article Influence: 30.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, Mende DR, Li J, Xu J, Li S, Li D, Cao J, Wang B, Liang H, Zheng H, Xie Y, Tap J, Lepage P, Bertalan M, Batto JM, Hansen T, Le Paslier D, Linneberg A, Nielsen HB, Pelletier E, Renault P, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Turner K, Zhu H, Yu C, Li S, Jian M, Zhou Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Li S, Qin N, Yang H, Wang J, Brunak S, Doré J, Guarner F, Kristiansen K, Pedersen O, Parkhill J, Weissenbach J; MetaHIT Consortium, Bork P, Ehrlich SD, Wang J. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59-65.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9101]  [Cited by in RCA: 8025]  [Article Influence: 535.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
11.  Barrett JC, Hansoul S, Nicolae DL, Cho JH, Duerr RH, Rioux JD, Brant SR, Silverberg MS, Taylor KD, Barmada MM, Bitton A, Dassopoulos T, Datta LW, Green T, Griffiths AM, Kistner EO, Murtha MT, Regueiro MD, Rotter JI, Schumm LP, Steinhart AH, Targan SR, Xavier RJ; NIDDK IBD Genetics Consortium, Libioulle C, Sandor C, Lathrop M, Belaiche J, Dewit O, Gut I, Heath S, Laukens D, Mni M, Rutgeerts P, Van Gossum A, Zelenika D, Franchimont D, Hugot JP, de Vos M, Vermeire S, Louis E;  Belgian-French IBD Consortium;  Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Cardon LR, Anderson CA, Drummond H, Nimmo E, Ahmad T, Prescott NJ, Onnie CM, Fisher SA, Marchini J, Ghori J, Bumpstead S, Gwilliam R, Tremelling M, Deloukas P, Mansfield J, Jewell D, Satsangi J, Mathew CG, Parkes M, Georges M, Daly MJ. Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn's disease. Nat Genet. 2008;40:955-962.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2114]  [Cited by in RCA: 2055]  [Article Influence: 120.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Reiff C, Kelly D. Inflammatory bowel disease, gut bacteria and probiotic therapy. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300:25-33.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in RCA: 120]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Caparrós E, Wiest R, Scharl M, Rogler G, Gutiérrez Casbas A, Yilmaz B, Wawrzyniak M, Francés R. Dysbiotic microbiota interactions in Crohn's disease. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1949096.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 69]  [Article Influence: 17.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Rubalcava NS, Gadepalli SK. Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children and Adolescents. Adv Pediatr. 2021;68:121-142.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Al-Beltagi M, Saeed NK, Mani PKC, Bediwy AS, Elbeltagi R. Inflammatory bowel disease in paediatrics: Navigating the old challenges and emerging frontiers. World J Gastroenterol. 2025;31:111934.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Samolygo IS, Manina MA, Yablokova EA, Stribul PA, Novikov AV, Antishin AS, Pestova AS, Tertychnyy AS, Munblit D, Erdes SI. Clinical and Phenotypic Characteristics of Early-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Five-Year Observational Study. Children (Basel). 2025;12:952.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Franke A, McGovern DP, Barrett JC, Wang K, Radford-Smith GL, Ahmad T, Lees CW, Balschun T, Lee J, Roberts R, Anderson CA, Bis JC, Bumpstead S, Ellinghaus D, Festen EM, Georges M, Green T, Haritunians T, Jostins L, Latiano A, Mathew CG, Montgomery GW, Prescott NJ, Raychaudhuri S, Rotter JI, Schumm P, Sharma Y, Simms LA, Taylor KD, Whiteman D, Wijmenga C, Baldassano RN, Barclay M, Bayless TM, Brand S, Büning C, Cohen A, Colombel JF, Cottone M, Stronati L, Denson T, De Vos M, D'Inca R, Dubinsky M, Edwards C, Florin T, Franchimont D, Gearry R, Glas J, Van Gossum A, Guthery SL, Halfvarson J, Verspaget HW, Hugot JP, Karban A, Laukens D, Lawrance I, Lemann M, Levine A, Libioulle C, Louis E, Mowat C, Newman W, Panés J, Phillips A, Proctor DD, Regueiro M, Russell R, Rutgeerts P, Sanderson J, Sans M, Seibold F, Steinhart AH, Stokkers PC, Torkvist L, Kullak-Ublick G, Wilson D, Walters T, Targan SR, Brant SR, Rioux JD, D'Amato M, Weersma RK, Kugathasan S, Griffiths AM, Mansfield JC, Vermeire S, Duerr RH, Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Schreiber S, Cho JH, Annese V, Hakonarson H, Daly MJ, Parkes M. Genome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of confirmed Crohn's disease susceptibility loci. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1118-1125.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2110]  [Cited by in RCA: 2024]  [Article Influence: 134.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, Fernandes GR, Tap J, Bruls T, Batto JM, Bertalan M, Borruel N, Casellas F, Fernandez L, Gautier L, Hansen T, Hattori M, Hayashi T, Kleerebezem M, Kurokawa K, Leclerc M, Levenez F, Manichanh C, Nielsen HB, Nielsen T, Pons N, Poulain J, Qin J, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Tims S, Torrents D, Ugarte E, Zoetendal EG, Wang J, Guarner F, Pedersen O, de Vos WM, Brunak S, Doré J; MetaHIT Consortium, Antolín M, Artiguenave F, Blottiere HM, Almeida M, Brechot C, Cara C, Chervaux C, Cultrone A, Delorme C, Denariaz G, Dervyn R, Foerstner KU, Friss C, van de Guchte M, Guedon E, Haimet F, Huber W, van Hylckama-Vlieg J, Jamet A, Juste C, Kaci G, Knol J, Lakhdari O, Layec S, Le Roux K, Maguin E, Mérieux A, Melo Minardi R, M'rini C, Muller J, Oozeer R, Parkhill J, Renault P, Rescigno M, Sanchez N, Sunagawa S, Torrejon A, Turner K, Vandemeulebrouck G, Varela E, Winogradsky Y, Zeller G, Weissenbach J, Ehrlich SD, Bork P. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473:174-180.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5822]  [Cited by in RCA: 5162]  [Article Influence: 368.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
19.  Gowen R, Gamal A, Di Martino L, McCormick TS, Ghannoum MA. Modulating the Microbiome for Crohn's Disease Treatment. Gastroenterology. 2023;164:828-840.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 35]  [Article Influence: 17.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:189-200.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1566]  [Cited by in RCA: 2521]  [Article Influence: 280.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Mann ER, Lam YK, Uhlig HH. Short-chain fatty acids: linking diet, the microbiome and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024;24:577-595.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 95]  [Cited by in RCA: 561]  [Article Influence: 561.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Koh A, De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Bäckhed F. From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites. Cell. 2016;165:1332-1345.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2533]  [Cited by in RCA: 4478]  [Article Influence: 497.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Parada Venegas D, De la Fuente MK, Landskron G, González MJ, Quera R, Dijkstra G, Harmsen HJM, Faber KN, Hermoso MA. Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)-Mediated Gut Epithelial and Immune Regulation and Its Relevance for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:277.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 970]  [Cited by in RCA: 2339]  [Article Influence: 389.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Franzosa EA, Sirota-Madi A, Avila-Pacheco J, Fornelos N, Haiser HJ, Reinker S, Vatanen T, Hall AB, Mallick H, McIver LJ, Sauk JS, Wilson RG, Stevens BW, Scott JM, Pierce K, Deik AA, Bullock K, Imhann F, Porter JA, Zhernakova A, Fu J, Weersma RK, Wijmenga C, Clish CB, Vlamakis H, Huttenhower C, Xavier RJ. Gut microbiome structure and metabolic activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:293-305.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 888]  [Cited by in RCA: 1312]  [Article Influence: 218.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Vich Vila A, Hu S, Andreu-Sánchez S, Collij V, Jansen BH, Augustijn HE, Bolte LA, Ruigrok RAAA, Abu-Ali G, Giallourakis C, Schneider J, Parkinson J, Al-Garawi A, Zhernakova A, Gacesa R, Fu J, Weersma RK. Faecal metabolome and its determinants in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2023;72:1472-1485.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in RCA: 90]  [Article Influence: 45.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Hu Y, Chen Z, Xu C, Kan S, Chen D. Disturbances of the Gut Microbiota and Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients. 2022;14:5140.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in RCA: 89]  [Article Influence: 29.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Li F, Wang Z, Tang T, Zhao Q, Wang Z, Han X, Xu Z, Chang Y, Li H, Hu S, Yu C, Chang S, Liu Y, Li Y. From serum metabolites to the gut: revealing metabolic clues to susceptibility to subtypes of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1375896.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Schirmer M, Stražar M, Avila-Pacheco J, Rojas-Tapias DF, Brown EM, Temple E, Deik A, Bullock K, Jeanfavre S, Pierce K, Jin S, Invernizzi R, Pust MM, Costliow Z, Mack DR, Griffiths AM, Walters T, Boyle BM, Kugathasan S, Vlamakis H, Hyams J, Denson L, Clish CB, Xavier RJ. Linking microbial genes to plasma and stool metabolites uncovers host-microbial interactions underlying ulcerative colitis disease course. Cell Host Microbe. 2024;32:209-226.e7.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in RCA: 46]  [Article Influence: 46.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Hu L, Liu J, Zhang W, Wang T, Zhang N, Lee YH, Lu H. Functional metabolomics decipher biochemical functions and associated mechanisms underlie small-molecule metabolism. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2020;39:417-433.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in RCA: 56]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Shagaleeva OY, Kashatnikova DA, Kardonsky DA, Konanov DN, Efimov BA, Bagrov DV, Evtushenko EG, Chaplin AV, Silantiev AS, Filatova JV, Kolesnikova IV, Vanyushkina AA, Stimpson J, Zakharzhevskaya NB. Investigating volatile compounds in the Bacteroides secretome. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1164877.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Shagaleeva OY, Kashatnikova DA, Kardonsky DA, Efimov BA, Ivanov VA, Smirnova SV, Zorkina YA, Vorobjeva EA, Silantiev AS, Kazakova VD, Kolesnikova IV, Markelova MI, Vanyushkina AA, Chaplin AV, Grigoryeva TV, Zakharzhevskaya NB. HS-GC-MS Method for the Diagnosis of IBD Dynamics in a Model of DSS-Induced Colitis. Bio Protoc. 2025;15:e5246.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Shagaleeva OY, Kashatnikova DA, Kardonsky DA, Danilova EY, Ivanov VA, Evsiev SS, Zubkov EA, Abramova OV, Zorkina YA, Morozova AY, Konanov DN, Silantiev AS, Efimov BA, Kolesnikova IV, Bespyatykh JA, Stimpson J, Zakharzhevskaya NB. GC-MS with Headspace Extraction for Non-Invasive Diagnostics of IBD Dynamics in a Model of DSS-Induced Colitis in Rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:3295.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Konanov DN, Zakharzhevskaya NB, Kardonsky DA, Zhgun ES, Kislun YV, Silantyev AS, Shagaleeva OY, Krivonos DV, Troshenkova AN, Govorun VM, Ilina EN. UniqPy: A tool for estimation of short-chain fatty acids composition by gas-chromatography/mass-spectrometry with headspace extraction. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2022;212:114681.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Levine A, Koletzko S, Turner D, Escher JC, Cucchiara S, de Ridder L, Kolho KL, Veres G, Russell RK, Paerregaard A, Buderus S, Greer ML, Dias JA, Veereman-Wauters G, Lionetti P, Sladek M, Martin de Carpi J, Staiano A, Ruemmele FM, Wilson DC; European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. ESPGHAN revised porto criteria for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58:795-806.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 822]  [Cited by in RCA: 1032]  [Article Influence: 93.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.   rrwick. GitHub - rrwick/Porechop: adapter trimmer for Oxford Nanopore reads [Internet]. GitHub. 2018 [cited 2025 September 4]. Available from: https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop#acknowledgements.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  De Coster W, Rademakers R. NanoPack2: population-scale evaluation of long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2023;39:btad311.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 330]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Curry KD, Wang Q, Nute MG, Tyshaieva A, Reeves E, Soriano S, Wu Q, Graeber E, Finzer P, Mendling W, Savidge T, Villapol S, Dilthey A, Treangen TJ. Emu: species-level microbial community profiling of full-length 16S rRNA Oxford Nanopore sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2022;19:845-853.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 155]  [Article Influence: 51.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  De Coster W, D'Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2666-2669.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1377]  [Cited by in RCA: 1932]  [Article Influence: 276.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Xu S, Zhan L, Tang W, Wang Q, Dai Z, Zhou L, Feng T, Chen M, Wu T, Hu E, Yu G. MicrobiotaProcess: A comprehensive R package for deep mining microbiome. Innovation (Camb). 2023;4:100388.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in RCA: 91]  [Article Influence: 45.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Buisson A, Sokol H, Hammoudi N, Nancey S, Treton X, Nachury M, Fumery M, Hébuterne X, Rodrigues M, Hugot JP, Boschetti G, Stefanescu C, Wils P, Seksik P, Le Bourhis L, Bezault M, Sauvanet P, Pereira B, Allez M, Barnich N; Remind study group. Role of adherent and invasive Escherichia coli in Crohn's disease: lessons from the postoperative recurrence model. Gut. 2023;72:39-48.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 38]  [Article Influence: 19.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Panzetta ME, Valdivia RH. Akkermansia in the gastrointestinal tract as a modifier of human health. Gut Microbes. 2024;16:2406379.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Kim JM, Rim JH, Kim DH, Kim HY, Choi SK, Kim DY, Choi YJ, Yu S, Cheon JH, Gee HY. Microbiome analysis reveals that Ralstonia is responsible for decreased renal function in patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11:e322.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Pan X, Xian P, Li Y, Zhao X, Zhang J, Song Y, Nan Y, Ni S, Hu K. Chemotaxis-driven hybrid liposomes recover intestinal homeostasis for targeted colitis therapy. J Control Release. 2025;380:829-845.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Donald K, Serapio-Palacios A, Bozorgmehr T, Ma M, Garcia MAI, Petersen C, Mandhane P, Subbarao P, Moraes TJ, Simons E, Turvey S, Azad MB, Finlay BB. Human milk IgA promotes normal immune development by limiting Th17-inducing Erysipelatoclostridium ramosum in the infant gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122:e2501030122.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Holmberg SM, Feeney RH, Prasoodanan P K V, Puértolas-Balint F, Singh DK, Wongkuna S, Zandbergen L, Hauner H, Brandl B, Nieminen AI, Skurk T, Schroeder BO. The gut commensal Blautia maintains colonic mucus function under low-fiber consumption through secretion of short-chain fatty acids. Nat Commun. 2024;15:3502.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 80]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Notting F, Pirovano W, Sybesma W, Kort R. The butyrate-producing and spore-forming bacterial genus Coprococcus as a potential biomarker for neurological disorders. Gut Microbiome (Camb). 2023;4:e16.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 58]  [Article Influence: 29.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Yang R, Shan S, Shi J, Li H, An N, Li S, Cui K, Guo H, Li Z. Coprococcus eutactus, a Potent Probiotic, Alleviates Colitis via Acetate-Mediated IgA Response and Microbiota Restoration. J Agric Food Chem. 2023;.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 73]  [Article Influence: 36.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Hazenberg MP, van de Merwe JP, Peña AS, Pennock-Schröder AM, van Lieshout LM. Antibodies to Coprococcus comes in sera of patients with Crohn's disease. Isolation and purification of the agglutinating antigen tested with an ELISA technique. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1987;23:143-148.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
49.  Kaci G, Goudercourt D, Dennin V, Pot B, Doré J, Ehrlich SD, Renault P, Blottière HM, Daniel C, Delorme C. Anti-inflammatory properties of Streptococcus salivarius, a commensal bacterium of the oral cavity and digestive tract. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:928-934.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 91]  [Cited by in RCA: 163]  [Article Influence: 13.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Couvigny B, de Wouters T, Kaci G, Jacouton E, Delorme C, Doré J, Renault P, Blottière HM, Guédon E, Lapaque N. Commensal Streptococcus salivarius Modulates PPARγ Transcriptional Activity in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125371.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 57]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Hall AB, Yassour M, Sauk J, Garner A, Jiang X, Arthur T, Lagoudas GK, Vatanen T, Fornelos N, Wilson R, Bertha M, Cohen M, Garber J, Khalili H, Gevers D, Ananthakrishnan AN, Kugathasan S, Lander ES, Blainey P, Vlamakis H, Xavier RJ, Huttenhower C. A novel Ruminococcus gnavus clade enriched in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Genome Med. 2017;9:103.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 320]  [Cited by in RCA: 552]  [Article Influence: 69.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Saitoh S, Noda S, Aiba Y, Takagi A, Sakamoto M, Benno Y, Koga Y. Bacteroides ovatus as the predominant commensal intestinal microbe causing a systemic antibody response in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002;9:54-59.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in RCA: 49]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Arend P, Martini GA. Ulcerative colitis. Etiologic unity or polyetiologic syndrome? Am J Proctol. 1970;21:331-336.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
54.  Baldwin K, Grossi V, Hyams JS. Managing pediatric Crohn's disease: recent insights. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;17:949-958.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Chachu KA, Osterman MT. How to Diagnose and Treat IBD Mimics in the Refractory IBD Patient Who Does Not Have IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1262-1274.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in RCA: 42]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Gecse KB, Vermeire S. Differential diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease: imitations and complications. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:644-653.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in RCA: 102]  [Article Influence: 14.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Dolinger M, Torres J, Vermeire S. Crohn's disease. Lancet. 2024;403:1177-1191.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in RCA: 242]  [Article Influence: 242.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (104)]
58.  Ni J, Wu GD, Albenberg L, Tomov VT. Gut microbiota and IBD: causation or correlation? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14:573-584.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1021]  [Cited by in RCA: 1256]  [Article Influence: 157.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Gasaly N, de Vos P, Hermoso MA. Impact of Bacterial Metabolites on Gut Barrier Function and Host Immunity: A Focus on Bacterial Metabolism and Its Relevance for Intestinal Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2021;12:658354.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in RCA: 336]  [Article Influence: 84.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Liverani E, Scaioli E, Digby RJ, Bellanova M, Belluzzi A. How to predict clinical relapse in inflammatory bowel disease patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:1017-1033.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 82]  [Cited by in RCA: 108]  [Article Influence: 12.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Tian K, Jing D, Lan J, Lv M, Wang T. Commensal microbiome and gastrointestinal mucosal immunity: Harmony and conflict with our closest neighbor. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024;12:e1316.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Radjabzadeh D, Boer CG, Beth SA, van der Wal P, Kiefte-De Jong JC, Jansen MAE, Konstantinov SR, Peppelenbosch MP, Hays JP, Jaddoe VWV, Ikram MA, Rivadeneira F, van Meurs JBJ, Uitterlinden AG, Medina-Gomez C, Moll HA, Kraaij R. Diversity, compositional and functional differences between gut microbiota of children and adults. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1040.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in RCA: 122]  [Article Influence: 24.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Kostic AD, Xavier RJ, Gevers D. The microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: current status and the future ahead. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1489-1499.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1145]  [Cited by in RCA: 1336]  [Article Influence: 121.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Agus A, Planchais J, Sokol H. Gut Microbiota Regulation of Tryptophan Metabolism in Health and Disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:716-724.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 834]  [Cited by in RCA: 1993]  [Article Influence: 332.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
65.  Wang G, Fan Y, Zhang G, Cai S, Ma Y, Yang L, Wang Y, Yu H, Qiao S, Zeng X. Microbiota-derived indoles alleviate intestinal inflammation and modulate microbiome by microbial cross-feeding. Microbiome. 2024;12:59.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 134]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Kong Y, Zhang T, Ye X, Wu J. Alterations of gut microbiota and metabolites in children with Crohn's disease and their correlation with disease activity. Transl Pediatr. 2025;14:960-971.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Kurata K, Kawahara H, Nishimura K, Jisaka M, Yokota K, Shimizu H. Skatole regulates intestinal epithelial cellular functions through activating aryl hydrocarbon receptors and p38. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;510:649-655.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 56]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Luu M, Pautz S, Kohl V, Singh R, Romero R, Lucas S, Hofmann J, Raifer H, Vachharajani N, Carrascosa LC, Lamp B, Nist A, Stiewe T, Shaul Y, Adhikary T, Zaiss MM, Lauth M, Steinhoff U, Visekruna A. The short-chain fatty acid pentanoate suppresses autoimmunity by modulating the metabolic-epigenetic crosstalk in lymphocytes. Nat Commun. 2019;10:760.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 146]  [Cited by in RCA: 356]  [Article Influence: 59.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Palmela C, Chevarin C, Xu Z, Torres J, Sevrin G, Hirten R, Barnich N, Ng SC, Colombel JF. Adherent-invasive Escherichia coli in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2018;67:574-587.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 250]  [Cited by in RCA: 389]  [Article Influence: 55.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]