BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Basic Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2026; 32(13): 115758
Published online Apr 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i13.115758
Biological welding: A rapid and bloodless approach to hemorrhoidectomy
Yuan Chen, Qian-Rui Zhang, Ming-Gan Guo, Zhong-Yi Sun, Fan-Chun Zeng
Yuan Chen, Qian-Rui Zhang, Ming-Gan Guo, Fan-Chun Zeng, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong Province, China
Yuan Chen, Zhong-Yi Sun, Fan-Chun Zeng, Urology and Reproduction Medicine Center, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Qian-Rui Zhang, Henan University Medical School, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, Henan Province, China
Co-first authors: Yuan Chen and Qian-Rui Zhang.
Co-corresponding authors: Zhong-Yi Sun and Fan-Chun Zeng.
Author contributions: Chen Y, Zhang QR, Guo MG, and Zeng FC were responsible for collection and assembly of data; Sun ZY conducted the data analysis and interpretation; Zeng FC, Chen Y, and Zhang QR primarily drafted the manuscript; Sun ZY performed critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; all authors reviewed the final manuscript and approved the version to be published.
Supported by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program, No. JCYJ20220531103004008; the Talent Introduction Program of Renji Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing University, No. 20251028-06; and Medicine-Engineering Interdisciplinary Research Foundation of Shenzhen University, No. 2023YG018.
Institutional review board statement: This study does not involve any human experiments.
Institutional animal care and use committee statement: All experiments involving animals have been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shenzhen University Medical School (No. IACUC-202400075).
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
ARRIVE guidelines statement: The authors have read the ARRIVE guidelines, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the ARRIVE guidelines.
Data sharing statement: The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Corresponding author: Fan-Chun Zeng, MD, Doctor, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, No. 3688 Nanhai Avenue, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong Province, China. zengisle@szu.edu.cn
Received: October 31, 2025
Revised: November 19, 2025
Accepted: January 21, 2026
Published online: April 7, 2026
Processing time: 154 Days and 3.4 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Traditional hemorrhoidectomy is often associated with problems such as long operation time, excessive bleeding, and slow recovery. As an emerging surgical method, biological welding technology integrates tissue fusion, cutting, and hemostasis, and is expected to overcome the above limitations.

AIM

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and underlying mechanism of biological welding technology for hemorrhoidectomy in an animal mod.

METHODS

Twenty adult healthy New Zealand rabbits were randomly allocated to two groups: The biological welding group (hemorrhoidectomy performed with biological welding technology) and the control group (traditional excisional hemorrhoidectomy with suturing). Key outcomes including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, histopathological changes, and recovery duration were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

The bio-welding group demonstrated a significantly shorter operation time (44.9 ± 17.2 seconds vs 222.2 ± 43.9 seconds, P < 0.001) and achieved zero intraoperative blood loss (0 g vs 18.75 ± 5.83 g, P < 0.001) compared to the control group. Despite a relatively high local temperature (59.85 ± 5.48 °C), only mild thermal damage occurred. Wound healing was better on post-operative days 7 and 14, with a significantly shorter average recovery time (12.83 ± 1.35 days vs 16.0 ± 1.91 days, P = 0.029). Mechanistic studies revealed that the technology promotes spatial reconstruction of collagen fibers and reduces postoperative inflammation, thereby accelerating orderly tissue repair.

CONCLUSION

Biological welding technology can safely and efficiently perform hemorrhoidectomy, significantly shorten the operation and recovery time, reduce bleeding, and promote tissue healing, showing good prospects for clinical translation.

Keywords: Biological welding; Hemorrhoidectomy; Surgical time; Blood loss; Recovery time; Pathological analysis

Core Tip: This study demonstrates that biological welding technology, which integrates tissue fusion, cutting, and hemostasis into a single procedure, offers a rapid and bloodless approach to hemorrhoidectomy. In a rabbit model, it significantly reduced operative time by approximately 80%, achieved zero intraoperative blood loss, and accelerated postoperative recovery compared to traditional excision and suturing. Mechanistically, it promotes organized tissue repair by remodeling collagen fibers and reducing inflammation. These findings highlight its potential as a safe, efficient, and innovative surgical technique for clinical application in the treatment of hemorrhoids.