Published online Aug 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8848
Peer-review started: February 12, 2015
First decision: March 26, 2015
Revised: April 12, 2015
Accepted: June 9, 2015
Article in press: June 10, 2015
Published online: August 7, 2015
Processing time: 178 Days and 4.1 Hours
AIM: To optimize the perfusates used for hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP).
METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned randomly to three groups (n = 12 per group) that received either saline, University of Wisconsin cold-storage solution (UW) or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK) as the perfusate. Each group was divided into two subgroups: static cold storage (SCS) and HMP (n = 6 per subgroup). The liver graft was retrieved according to the method described by Kamada. For the SCS group, the graft was directly placed into cold perfusate (0-4 °C) for 6 h after liver isolation while the portal vein of the graft was connected to the perfusion machine for the HMP group. Then the perfusates were collected at different time points for analysis of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Liver tissues were obtained for evaluation of histology, dry/wet weight (D/W) ratio, and malondialdehyde (MDA) and adenosine-triphosphate (ATP) levels. The portal vein pressure and velocity were monitored in real time in all HMP subgroups.
RESULTS: Comparison of HMP and SCS: Regardless of the perfusate, HMP improved the architecture of donor graft in reducing the congestion around sinusoids and central vein and maintaining sinusoid lining in morphology; HMP improved liver function in terms of ALT, AST and LDH, especially during the 3-6 h period (SCS vs HMP using saline: ALT3, 225.00 ± 105.62 vs 49.50 ± 18.50, P = 0.047; LDH3, 1362.17 ± 563.30 vs 325.75 ± 147.43, P = 0.041; UW: LDH6, 2880.14 ± 948.46 vs 2135.00 ± 174.27, P = 0.049; HTK, AST6, 307.50 ± 52.95 vs 185.20 ± 20.46, P = 0.041); HMP decreased MDA level (saline, 2.79 ± 0.30 vs 1.09 ± 0.09, P = 0.008; UW, 3.01 ± 0.77 vs 1.23 ± 0.68, P = 0.005; HTK, 3.30 ± 0.52 vs 1.56 ± 0.22, P = 0.006). Comparison among HMP subgroups: HTK showed less portal vein resistance than UW and saline (vs saline, 3.41 ± 0.49 vs 5.00 ± 0.38, P < 0.001; vs UW, 3.41 ± 0.49 vs 4.52 ± 0.63, P = 0.007); UW reduced edema most efficiently (vs saline, 0.68 ± 0.02 vs 0.79 ± 0.05, P = 0.013), while HTK maintained ATP levels best (vs saline, 622.60 ± 29.11 vs 327.43 ± 44.66, P < 0.001; vs UW, 622.60 ± 29.11 vs 301.80 ± 37.68, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: HMP is superior to SCS in maintaining both architecture and function of liver grafts. Further, HTK was found to be the optimal perfusate for HMP.
Core tip: Although static cold storage (SCS) is the gold standard for liver transplantation, hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) is currently challenging the limitations of SCS. However, there is no consensus on the basic setting for HMP, including the ideal perfusate. Here we compared the most common preservation solutions [University of Wisconsin cold-storage solution and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK), saline as control] and found that HMP is superior to SCS regardless of different solutions and HTK seems to be the optimal perfusate for HMP.