BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 18, 2025; 13(4): 108504
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i4.108504
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies on rs1333048 polymorphisms in ANRIL gene and periodontitis
Reference
Ethnicity/country
Study design
Diagnosis (clinical subtypes)
Subject type
Sample size (Cc/Co)
Age (years) (Cc/Co)
HWE (P value)
Methods of genotyping
Score
Chen et al[10], 2012Asian/ChinaCase/ControlCP-221/17241.6 ± 8.8/40.0 ± 9.2YesReal time PCR14
Ernst et al[11], 2010Caucasian/German and Northern IrelandCase/ControlgAgP-130/33915-35/40-80YesReal time PCR13
Schaefer et al[9], 2009Caucasian/GermanyVerification/ReplicationgAgP-151/73638 ± 6.6/63 ± 7.4YesSNPlex/TaqMan14
LAgP-137/36837 ± 7.0/37 ± 9.6
Schaefer et al[12], 2011Caucasian/Germany and NetherlandsCase/ControlCP-154/42145.2 ± 9.5/32.3 ± 9.0YesSNPlex/TaqMan15
AgP159/42133.8 ± 4.7/32.3 ± 9.0
Schaefer et al[20], 2013 Caucasian/Turkey, Italy and GermanyExplorationAgPTurkey89/72-YesArray Immunochip18
Italy44/99Yes
Germany594/1441Yes
Taiete et al[21], 2018Mixed/BrazilCase/ControlAgP-200/19634.0 ± 4.6/30.5 ± 5.8NoPCR-RFLP17
CP-190/19650.0 ± 7.2/30.5 ± 5.8Yes16
Teeuw et al[22], 2015Caucasian/NetherlandsCase/ControlPeriodontitis-115/5645.5 ± 9.9/43.9 ± 13.2YesTaqMan
Table 2 Meta-analysis calculation of the rs1333048 polymorphism in ANRIL gene and periodontitis risk (allelic and genotypic comparisons; subgroups analyses)
Comparison (n)
OR (95%CI)
P value (Z test)
I², %
Pheterogeneity
Statistical model used
Overall (n = 12)
M vs m1.24 (1.15-1.34)P < 0.0528P = 0.17F
m vs M0.80 (0.75-0.87)P < 0.0528P = 0.17F
MM vs mm1.53 (1.32-1.78)P < 0.0530P = 0.16F
mm vs MM0.65 (0.56-0.76)P < 0.0530P = 0.16F
MM vs Mm/mm1.38 (1.22-1.56)P < 0.0527P = 0.18F
Mm vs MM/mm0.97 (0.87-1.08)P = 0.5325P = 0.20F
CP (n = 3)
M vs m1.25 (1.07-1.47)P = 0.0060P = 0.81F
m vs M0.80 (0.68-0.94)P = 0.0060P = 0.81F
MM vs mm1.58 (1.14-2.18)P = 0.0050P = 0.77F
mm vs MM0.63 (0.46-0.87)P = 0.0050P = 0.77F
MM vs Mm/mm1.36 (1.05-1.77)P = 0.020P = 0.80F
Mm vs MM/mm0.98 (0.79-1.23)P = 0.890P = 0.92F
AgP (n = 8)
M vs m1.23 (1.13-1.34)P < 0.0547P = 0.07F
m vs M0.81 (0.75-0.89)P < 0.0547P = 0.07F
MM vs mm1.49 (1.25-1.77)P < 0.0548P = 0.06F
mm vs MM0.67 (0.57-0.80)P < 0.0548P = 0.06F
MM vs Mm/mm1.37 (1.19-1.58)P < 0.0551P = 0.05F
Mm vs MM/mm0.95 (0.84-1.08)P = 0.4449P = 0.06F
Caucasian (n = 9)
M vs m1.27 (1.16-1.38)P < 0.0525P = 0.22F
m vs M0.79 (0.72-0.86)P < 0.0525P = 0.22F
MM vs mm1.59 (1.34-1.88)P < 0.0526P = 0.21F
mm vs MM0.63 (0.53-0.74)P < 0.0526P = 0.21F
MM vs Mm/mm1.39 (1.21-1.60)P < 0.0543P = 0.08F
Mm vs MM/mm0.97 (0.87-1.08)P = 0.9433P = 0.15F
Mixed (n = 2)
M vs m1.11 (0.91-1.36)P = 0.5568P = 0.08R
m vs M0.90 (0.63-1.28)P = 0.5568P = 0.08R
MM vs mm1.22 (0.83-1.81)P = 0.5570P = 0.07R
mm vs MM0.82 (0.55-1.21)P = 0.5570P = 0.07R
MM vs Mm/mm1.26 (0.93-1.72)P = 0.140P = 0.49F
Mm vs MM/mm0.84 (0.64-1.11)P = 0.2330P = 0.23F