Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 6, 2021; 9(4): 812-821
Published online Feb 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.812
Published online Feb 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.812
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population
Item | Group I (n = 32) | Group II (n = 39) | Group III (n = 29) | P value |
Age (yr) | 55.56 ± 9.49 | 55.03 ± 9.35 | 58.14 ± 9.56 | 0.38 |
Male, % | 68.8 (22) | 46.2 (18) | 14.4 (12) | 0.07 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.66 ± 3.17 | 25.77 ± 3.49 | 24.34 ± 2.86 | 0.15 |
Smoking, % | 40.6 (13) | 28.2 (11) | 20.7 (6) | 0.23 |
Hypertension, % | 50.0 (16) | 51.3 (20) | 41.4 (12) | 0.70 |
Diabetes, % | 21.9 (7) | 15.4 (6) | 17.2 (5) | 0.77 |
Stroke history, % | 3.1 (1) | 2.6 (1) | 3.4 (1) | 0.98 |
Follow-up period (d) | 456.28 ± 27.86 | 460.08 ± 32.91 | 460.97 ± 33.61 | 0.82 |
Table 2 Changes in blood lipids
Item | Group I (n = 32) | Group II (n = 39) | Group III (n = 29) | P value |
LDL-C (mmoL/L) | ||||
Baseline | 2.35 ± 0.67 | 2.88 ± 1.00 | 3.17 ± 0.98 | 0.02 |
Follow-up | 2.72 ± 0.57 | 2.84 ± 0.71 | 2.12 ± 0.45 | < 0.001 |
Change | 0.41 ± 0.40 | -0.04 ± 0.51 | -1.05 ± 0.75 | < 0.001 |
HDL-C (mmoL/L) | ||||
Baseline | 1.16 ± 2.92 | 1.34 ± 0.99 | 1.0 ± 0.29 | 1.37 |
Follow-up | 1.04 ± 0.22 | 1.33 ± 0.76 | 1.14 ± 0.22 | 0.08 |
Change | -0.12 ± 0.17 | -0.01 ± 0.29 | 0.14 ± 0.19 | < 0.001 |
TC (mmoL/L) | ||||
Baseline | 3.89 ± 0.73 | 4.74 ± 1.05 | 4.56 ± 1.21 | 0.04 |
Follow-up | 3.99 ± 0.64 | 4.64 ± 0.77 | 4.12 ± 0.83 | 0.002 |
Change | 0.11 ± 0.22 | -0.10 ± 0.59 | -0.33 ± 0.58 | 0.011 |
TG (mmoL/L) | ||||
Baseline | 1.65 ± 0.87 | 1.09 ± 0.59 | 1.44 ± 0.95 | 0.06 |
Follow-up | 1.65 ± 0.53 | 1.39 ± 0.41 | 1.36 ± 0.56 | 0.08 |
Change | -0.02 ± 0.89 | 0.05 ± 1.27 | -0.03 ± 0.69 | 0.94 |
Table 3 Medication application
Item | Group I (n = 32) | Group II (n = 39) | Group III (n = 29) | P value |
Baseline | ||||
Aspirin | 34.3 (11) | 23.1 (9) | 34.5 (10) | 0.48 |
β-receptor blocker | 15.6 (5) | 7.7 (3) | 20.7 (6) | 0.30 |
ACEI/ARB | 15.6 (5) | 10.3 (4) | 10.3 (3) | 0.75 |
CCB | 12.5 (4) | 17.9 (7) | 24.1 (7) | 0.50 |
Statins | 9.4 (3) | 7.7 (3) | 13.8 (4) | 0.70 |
Glucose-lowering treatment | 18.8 (6) | 7.7 (3) | 17.2 (5) | 0.32 |
Follow-up | ||||
Aspirin | 28.1 (9) | 20.5 (8) | 34.5 (10) | 0.43 |
β-receptor blocker | 12.5 (4) | 7.7 (3) | 20.7 (6) | 0.30 |
ACEI/ARB | 18.8 (6) | 12.8 (5) | 13.8 (4) | 0.77 |
CCB | 12.5 (4) | 12.8 (5) | 17.2 (5) | 0.84 |
Glucose-lowering treatment | 18.8 (6) | 10.3 (4) | 17.2 (5) | 0.55 |
Types of statins during follow-up | 0.27 | |||
Atorvastatin | 46.9 (15) | 51.3 (20) | 58.6 (17) | |
Simvastatin | 31.3 (10) | 33.3 (13) | 27.6 (8) | |
Pravastatin | 3.1 (1) | 0 (0) | 3.4 (1) | |
Rosuvastatin | 15.6 (5) | 12.8 (5) | 10.3 (3) | |
Fluvastatin | 3.1 (1) | 2.6 (1) | 0 (0) |
Table 4 Changes of coronary plaque characteristics
Item | Group I (n = 32) | Group II (n = 39) | Group III (n = 29) | P value |
Total number of plaques (n)1 | 50 | 56 | 46 | |
Number of plaques, per person | 1.56 ± 0.62 | 1.43 ± 0.75 | 1.52 ± 0.79 | 0.70 |
Length (mm), per plaque | 10.19 ± 5.12 | 9.97 ± 4.70 | 8.84 ± 3.73 | 0.32 |
Plaque nature | 0.94 | |||
Non-calcified | 54.0 (27) | 57.1 (32) | 56.5 (26) | |
Mixed | 46.0 (23) | 42.9 (24) | 43.5 (20) | |
Lesion number | 0.65 | |||
Single-vessel | 53.1 (17) | 64.1 (25) | 62.1 (18) | |
Double-vessel | 31.3 (10) | 30.8 (12) | 27.6 (8) | |
Triple-vessel/left main | 15.6 (5) | 5.1 (2) | 10.3 (3) | |
Most severe plaque volume (5 mm), per plaque | ||||
Baseline, mm3 | 8.18 ± 5.82 | 8.34 ± 5.31 | 8.03 ± 5.48 | 0.96 |
Follow-up, mm3 | 10.19 ± 5.66 | 10.38 ± 5.81 | 6.67 ± 4.99 | 0.001 |
Plaque volume change, mm3 | 2.01 ± 1.02 | 2.03 ± 1.35 | -1.36 ± 1.94 | < 0.001 |
Plaque volume percentage change, % | 7.24 ± 4.95 | 6.98 ± 5.18 | -3.48 ± 4.74 | < 0.001 |
Plaque volume, per plaque | ||||
Baseline, mm3 | 14.79 ± 15.11 | 14.76 ± 11.97 | 11.28 ± 9.53 | 0.29 |
Follow-up, mm3 | 17.82 ± 16.75 | 17.41 ± 13.58 | 9.58 ± 7.95 | 0.002 |
Plaque volume change, mm3 | 3.09 ± 2.93 | 2.64 ± 3.12 | -1.79 ± 3.04 | < 0.001 |
Plaque volume percentage change, % | 5.38 ± 6.09 | 5.05 ± 4.82 | -2.04 ± 3.68 | < 0.001 |
CACS2 | ||||
Baseline | 41.22 ± 55.04 | 45.44 ± 31.82 | 101.00 ± 210.44 | 0.40 |
Follow-up | 51.72 ± 65.76 | 56.78 ± 35.18 | 114.45 ± 229.93 | 0.44 |
CACS change | 10.5 ± 11.62 | 11.22 ± 7.07 | 13.46 ± 20.12 | 0.86 |
CACS percentage change, % | 89.32 ± 147.81 | 35.45 ± 21.79 | 40.65 ± 46.44 | 0.35 |
Baseline RI | 0.96 ± 0.30 | 1.00 ± 0.35 | 0.96 ± 0.35 | 0.74 |
Follow-up RI | 1.06 ± 0.35 | 1.12 ± 0.32 | 0.97 ± 0.32 | 0.10 |
- Citation: Wu X, Liu XB, Liu T, Tian W, Sun YJ. Effects of different statins application methods on plaques in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(4): 812-821
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i4/812.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.812