Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2021; 9(32): 9741-9751
Published online Nov 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9741
Published online Nov 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9741
Table 1 Demographic and medical characteristics of the population
Groups | Within 1 mo | More than 1 mo | P value |
Number of patients | 26 | 26 | |
Sex | 0.548 | ||
Male (n) | 19 | 17 | |
Female (n) | 7 | 9 | |
Age at injury, mean ± SD (yr) | 5.35 ± 4.32 | 5.46 ± 4.33 | 0.924 |
Hand injury | 0.105 | ||
Palm of hand | 7 | 3 | |
Dorsum of hand | 2 | 0 | |
Palm and dorsum of hand | 17 | 23 | |
Etiology (n) | 0.188 | ||
Scald | 9 | 8 | |
Fire/flame | 5 | 10 | |
Electricity | 3 | 0 | |
Plastic surgery | 9 | 8 | |
Length of stay, mean ± SD (d) | 47.65 ± 44.95 | 27.50 ± 24.75 | 0.051 |
Rehabilitation length of stay, mean ± SD (d) | 17.96 ± 25.24 | 22.19 ± 18.65 | 0.495 |
time post injury of Rehabilitation, mean ± SD (d) | 17.62 ± 5.09 | 107.58 ± 62.18 | 0.000 |
Education level of parents | 0.659 | ||
Primary school | 5 | 7 | |
Middle school | 16 | 16 | |
college | 5 | 3 | |
Live | 0.358 | ||
Urban | 6 | 9 | |
Suburban | 20 | 17 |
Table 2 Severity of total active range of motion limitation by hand joint muscle action before rehabilitation therapy
Groups | ≤ 25% | 25%-50% | 50%-75% | > 75% | Total |
Patients within 1 mo after injury | 4 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 26 |
Patients with more than 1 month after injury | 12 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 26 |
Total | 16 | 13 | 10 | 13 | 52 |
Table 3 Total active range of motion of metacarpophalangeal point, proximal interphalangeal point and distal interphalangeal point
Groups | Within 1 mo | More than 1 mo | P value |
Pre-rehabilitation therapy | 554.04 ± 358.37 | 752.12 ± 375.55 | 0.057 |
Post-rehabilitation therapy | 888.85 ± 345.56 | 901.73 ± 346.38 | 0.089 |
P value | 0.001 | 0.142 |
Table 4 Treatment efficacy of total active range of motion after rehabilitation therapy
Groups | ≤ 25% | 25%-50% | 50%-75% | > 75% | Total |
Patients within 1 mo after injury | 7 (26.9) | 5 (19.2%) | 4 (15.4%) | 10 (38.5%) | 26 |
Patients with more than 1 mo after injury | 18 (69.2%) | 3 (11.5%) | 1 (3.8%) | 4 (15.4%) | 26 |
Total | 25 | 8 | 5 | 14 | 52 |
Table 5 Ordered logistic analysis of predictors of the treatment efficacy
Variable | B | Exp (B) | SE | P value | 95%CI |
Male | -0.566 | 0.568 | 0.883 | 0.522 | -2.296-1.165 |
Age | -0.210 | 0.811 | 0.147 | 0.065 | -0.056-0.017 |
Inpatient | 3.909 | 49.849 | 1.771 | 0.027 | 0.439-7.379 |
Hospital length of stay (d) | -0.091 | 0.913 | 0.031 | 0.003 | -0.151-(-0.031) |
Time post injury of rehabilitation intervention | -0.038 | 0.963 | 0.014 | 0.007 | -0.065-(-0.011) |
Rehabilitation (d) | 0.130 | 1.139 | 0.047 | 0.005 | 0.039-0.221 |
Fire/flame | 3.851 | 47.040 | 1.519 | 0.011 | 0.874-6.829 |
Electricity | 4.591 | 98.593 | 1.817 | 0.012 | 1.029-8.153 |
- Citation: Zhou YQ, Zhou JY, Luo GX, Tan JL. Effects of early rehabilitation in improvement of paediatric burnt hands function. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(32): 9741-9751
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i32/9741.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9741