Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2021; 9(29): 8694-8701
Published online Oct 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8694
Published online Oct 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8694
Table 1 Comparison of time to symptom relief between the two groups (mean ± SD, d)
Group | n | Time to recovery of white blood cells | Time to recovery of body temperature | Time to disappearance of cough and expectoration | Time to disappearance of rales |
Study | 37 | 6.79 ± 2.09 | 4.15 ± 1.08 | 6.19 ± 1.56 | 6.68 ± 1.43 |
Control | 37 | 8.89 ± 2.32 | 5.81 ± 1.33 | 8.77 ± 2.11 | 8.69 ± 2.12 |
t | 4.091 | 5.894 | 5.981 | 4.781 | |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of therapeutic effects between the two groups, n (%)
Group | n | Remarkably effective | Effective | Invalid | Total effectiveness |
Study | 37 | 23 (62.16) | 12 (32.43) | 2 (5.41) | 35 (94.59) |
Control | 37 | 17 (45.95) | 11 (29.73) | 9 (24.32) | 28 (75.68) |
χ2 | 5.232 | ||||
P value | 0.022 |
Table 3 Comparison of laboratory indexes between the two groups before and 7 d after treatment (mean ± SD)
Group | n | PCT (ug/L) | CRP (mg/L) | WBC (× 109/L) | NE (%) |
Before treatment | |||||
Study | 37 | 12.89 ± 3.96 | 19.62 ± 6.44 | 20.61 ± 6.38 | 86.14 ± 7.21 |
Control | 37 | 14.05 ± 4.11 | 18.79 ± 5.96 | 21.21 ± 5.59 | 84.39 ± 6.95 |
t | 1.236 | 0.575 | 0.430 | 1.063 | |
P value | 0.220 | 0.567 | 0.668 | 0.291 | |
After 7 d of treatment | |||||
Study | 37 | 2.01 ± 0.56 | 3.11 ± 1.02 | 5.10 ± 1.83 | 56.35 ± 7.17 |
Control | 37 | 3.29 ± 0.64 | 5.67 ± 1.23 | 8.13 ± 3.01 | 64.22 ± 8.08 |
t | 9.155 | 9.745 | 5.232 | 4.432 | |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups, n (%)
Group | n | Pain at injection site | Skin itch | Vomiting and nausea | Gastrointestinal reaction | Total incidence rate |
Study | 37 | 1 (2.50) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (5.00) | 0 (0.00) | 3 (7.50) |
Control | 37 | 1 (2.50) | 2 (5.00) | 1 (2.50) | 1 (2.50) | 5 (12.50) |
χ2 | 0.140 | |||||
P value | 0.708 |
- Citation: Wang XX, Ma CT, Jiang YX, Ge YJ, Liu FY, Xu WG. Cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium vs piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium for treatment of respiratory tract infection in elderly patients. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(29): 8694-8701
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i29/8694.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8694