Wang XX, Ma CT, Jiang YX, Ge YJ, Liu FY, Xu WG. Cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium vs piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium for treatment of respiratory tract infection in elderly patients. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(29): 8694-8701 [PMID: 34734047 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8694]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Wen-Gang Xu, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shandong Qingdao Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, No. 5 Jiaxiang Road, Shinan District, Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China. jackyxu2021@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Respiratory System
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2021; 9(29): 8694-8701 Published online Oct 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8694
Table 1 Comparison of time to symptom relief between the two groups (mean ± SD, d)
Group
n
Time to recovery of white blood cells
Time to recovery of body temperature
Time to disappearance of cough and expectoration
Time to disappearance of rales
Study
37
6.79 ± 2.09
4.15 ± 1.08
6.19 ± 1.56
6.68 ± 1.43
Control
37
8.89 ± 2.32
5.81 ± 1.33
8.77 ± 2.11
8.69 ± 2.12
t
4.091
5.894
5.981
4.781
P value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Table 2 Comparison of therapeutic effects between the two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Remarkably effective
Effective
Invalid
Total effectiveness
Study
37
23 (62.16)
12 (32.43)
2 (5.41)
35 (94.59)
Control
37
17 (45.95)
11 (29.73)
9 (24.32)
28 (75.68)
χ2
5.232
P value
0.022
Table 3 Comparison of laboratory indexes between the two groups before and 7 d after treatment (mean ± SD)
Group
n
PCT (ug/L)
CRP (mg/L)
WBC (× 109/L)
NE (%)
Before treatment
Study
37
12.89 ± 3.96
19.62 ± 6.44
20.61 ± 6.38
86.14 ± 7.21
Control
37
14.05 ± 4.11
18.79 ± 5.96
21.21 ± 5.59
84.39 ± 6.95
t
1.236
0.575
0.430
1.063
P value
0.220
0.567
0.668
0.291
After 7 d of treatment
Study
37
2.01 ± 0.56
3.11 ± 1.02
5.10 ± 1.83
56.35 ± 7.17
Control
37
3.29 ± 0.64
5.67 ± 1.23
8.13 ± 3.01
64.22 ± 8.08
t
9.155
9.745
5.232
4.432
P value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Pain at injection site
Skin itch
Vomiting and nausea
Gastrointestinal reaction
Total incidence rate
Study
37
1 (2.50)
0 (0.00)
2 (5.00)
0 (0.00)
3 (7.50)
Control
37
1 (2.50)
2 (5.00)
1 (2.50)
1 (2.50)
5 (12.50)
χ2
0.140
P value
0.708
Citation: Wang XX, Ma CT, Jiang YX, Ge YJ, Liu FY, Xu WG. Cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium vs piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium for treatment of respiratory tract infection in elderly patients. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(29): 8694-8701