BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2021; 9(29): 8694-8701
Published online Oct 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8694
Cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium vs piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium for treatment of respiratory tract infection in elderly patients
Xiao-Xia Wang, Cheng-Tai Ma, Yan-Xia Jiang, Yun-Jie Ge, Fa-Yun Liu, Wen-Gang Xu
Xiao-Xia Wang, Yun-Jie Ge, Department of Cadre Health, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China
Cheng-Tai Ma, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China
Yan-Xia Jiang, Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China
Fa-Yun Liu, Wen-Gang Xu, Department of Pulmonary, Shandong Qingdao Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China
Author contributions: Wang XX, Ma CT, and Xu WG designed the research study; Jiang YX and Ge YJ performed the research; Liu FY analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Qingdao Municipal Hospital Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent statement: All study participants provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Corresponding author: Wen-Gang Xu, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shandong Qingdao Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, No. 5 Jiaxiang Road, Shinan District, Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China. jackyxu2021@126.com
Received: June 2, 2021
Peer-review started: June 2, 2021
First decision: June 24, 2021
Revised: July 5, 2021
Accepted: August 9, 2021
Article in press: August 9, 2021
Published online: October 16, 2021
Processing time: 135 Days and 1.2 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Respiratory tract infections in the elderly are difficult to cure and can easily recur, thereby posing a great threat to patient prognosis and quality of life.

AIM

To investigate the therapeutic effects of different antibiotics in elderly patients with respiratory tract infection.

METHODS

Seventy-four elderly patients with respiratory tract infection were randomly allocated to a study (n = 37; treated with cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium) or control (n = 37; treated with piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium on the basis of routine symptomatic support) group. Both groups were treated for 7 d. Time to symptom relief (leukocyte recovery; body temperature recovery; cough and sputum disappearance; and rale disappearance time), treatment effect, and laboratory indexes [procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and neutrophil percentage (NE)] before and 7 d after treatment and the incidence of adverse reactions were assessed.

RESULTS

In the study group, the time to WBC normalization (6.79 ± 2.09 d), time to body temperature normalization (4.15 ± 1.08 d), time to disappearance of cough and sputum (6.19 ± 1.56 d), and time to disappearance of rales (6.68 ± 1.43 d) were shorter than those of the control group (8.89 ± 2.32 d, 5.81 ± 1.33 d, 8.77 ± 2.11 d, and 8.69 ± 2.12 d, respectively; P = 0.000). Total effective rate was higher in the study group (94.59% vs 75.68%, P = 0.022). Serum PCT (12.89 ± 3.96 μg/L), CRP (19.62 ± 6.44 mg/L), WBC (20.61 ± 6.38 × 109/L), and NE (86.14 ± 7.21%) levels of the study group before treatment were similar to those of the control group (14.05 ± 4.11 μg/L, 18.79 ± 5.96 mg/L, 21.21 ± 5.59 × 109/L, and 84.39 ± 6.95%, respectively) with no significant differences (P = 0.220, 0.567, 0.668, and 0.291, respectively). After 7 d of treatment, serum PCT, CRP, WBC, and NE levels in the two groups were lower than those before treatment. Serum PCT (2.01 ± 0.56 μg/L), CRP (3.11 ± 1.02 mg/L), WBC (5.10 ± 1.83 × 109/L), and NE (56.35 ± 7.17%) levels were lower in the study group than in the control group (3.29 ± 0.64 μg/L, 5.67 ± 1.23 mg/L, 8.13 ± 3.01 × 109/L, and 64.22 ± 8.08%, respectively; P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the groups (7.50% vs 12.50%, P = 0.708).

CONCLUSION

Piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium is superior to cefoperazone sodium/ sulbactam sodium in the treatment of elderly patients with respiratory tract infection with a similar safety profile.

Keywords: Cefoperazone sodium; Sulbactam sodium; Piperacillin sodium; Tazobactam sodium; Respiratory tract infection; Elderly

Core Tip: Antibiotics are the main treatment for respiratory tract infection in elderly patients. Piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium belongs to the β-lactam antibiotics class, with a wide antibacterial spectrum, and plays an important role in the treatment of diseases. In this study, the authors wanted to determine the therapeutic value and safety of different antibiotics.

Write to the Help Desk