Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2021; 9(27): 8242-8248
Published online Sep 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8242
Published online Sep 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8242
Ref. | Study type | Clavicle cases/total cases | Initial fracture treatment | Device | Energy level | Sessions | Outcome |
Moretti et al[29], 2009 | Retrospective case series | NM/204 | NM | Minilith SL1 (Storz) | 0.22-1.10 mJ/mm2 | NM | Positive |
Carfagni et al[31], 2011 | Retrospective case series | 3/93 | NM | Duolith (Storz), Modulith SLK (Storz) | 0.20-0.55 mJ/mm2 | 4-5 | NM |
Vulpiani et al[30], 2012 | Prospective cohort study | 6/143 | Conservative treatment and Internal fixation | Modulith SLK (Storz) | 0.25-0.84 mJ/mm2 | 3-5 | NM |
Alkhawashki[28], 2015 | Retrospective case series | 1/49 | Conservative treatment | OssaTron (HMT) | 26 KV | 1 | Positive |
Kertzman et al[7], 2017 | Retrospective case series | 1/22 | Internal fixation | Swiss DolorClast (EMS) | 0.18 mJ/ mm2 | 2 | Negative |
- Citation: Yue L, Chen H, Feng TH, Wang R, Sun HL. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for midshaft clavicular delayed union: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(27): 8242-8248
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i27/8242.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8242