Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2020; 8(21): 5139-5148
Published online Nov 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5139
Published online Nov 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5139
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the 81 patients, n (%)
| Characteristics | Patients, n = 81 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 59 (72.8) |
| Female | 22 (27.2) |
| Smoking status | |
| Nonsmoker | 39 (48.1) |
| Former or current smoker | 42 (51.9) |
| Pathological type | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 62 (76.5) |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 11 (13.6) |
| Adenosquamous carcinoma | 3 (3.7) |
| NSCLC-NOS | 5 (6.2) |
| Clinical stage | |
| IIIA | 15 (18.5) |
| IIIB | 28 (34.6) |
| IIIC | 3 (3.7) |
| IV | 35 (43.2) |
| Distant metastasis | |
| Malignant pleural effusion | 3 (3.7) |
| Pleura | 4 (4.9) |
| Contralateral lung | 9 (11.1) |
| Bone | 14 (17.3) |
| Brain | 9 (11.1) |
| Liver | 3 (3.7) |
| Adrenal gland | 5 (6.2) |
Table 2 Puncture site and lesion size
| Location of sample | Patients, n | Minimum, mm | Maximum, mm |
| Primary tumor | |||
| Right | 18 | 24 | 65 |
| Left | 7 | 28 | 91 |
| Lymph node | |||
| 2R | 2 | 10 | 21 |
| 4R | 19 | 9 | 34 |
| 4L | 4 | 27 | 28 |
| 5 | 2 | 19 | 38 |
| 7 | 35 | 15 | 70 |
| 8 | 2 | 12 | 20 |
| 10R | 5 | 24 | 26 |
| 10L | 3 | 23 | 45 |
Table 3 Puncture of multiple lesions
| Location of sample | Patients, n |
| 4R, 4L, 7 | 1 |
| 4R, 7 | 7 |
| 5, 7 | 1 |
| 7, 8 | 1 |
| Left lung mass, 7 | 1 |
| Right lung mass, 4R | 2 |
| Right lung mass, 7 | 2 |
Table 4 Molecular analysis of all patients
| Adenocarcinoma, n = 62 | Squamous cell carcinoma, n = 11 | Adenosquamous carcinoma, n = 3 | NSCLC-NOS, n = 5 | |
| EGFR mutation | ||||
| Exon 19 | ||||
| E746-A750del (1) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| E746-A750del (2) | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| L747-T751del | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| L747-S752del | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| L747-A750del | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Exon 21 | 0 | |||
| L858R | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| L861Q | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KRAS mutation | ||||
| Exon 2 | ||||
| G12C | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| G12D | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G12V | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G12L | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ROS-1 (FISH) positive | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ALK (Ventana IHC) positive | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 5 Molecular analysis of patients with multiple lesions
| Type | Puncture site | Mutation | Puncture site | Mutation | |
| 1 | Adenocarcinoma | 5 | Insufficient sample | 7 | EGFR, exon 21 L858R |
| 2 | Adenocarcinoma | Right lung mass | EGFR, exon 21 L858R | 7 | EGFR, exon 21 L858R |
| 3 | Adenocarcinoma | 4R | EGFR, exon 21 L858R | 7 | EGFR, exon 21 L858R |
| 4 | Squamous cell carcinoma | 4R | KRAS, exon 2 G12C | 7 | KRAS, exon 2 G12C |
Table 6 Response to targeted therapy
| Drugs | CR, n | PR, n | SD, n | PD, n | |
| EGFR mutation | Gefitinib, erlotinib, extinib | 0 | 13 | 3 | 3 |
| ROS-1 positive | Crizotinib | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| ALK positive | Crizotinib | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
- Citation: Su W, Tian XD, Liu P, Zhou DJ, Cao FL. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration specimens for molecular diagnosis of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(21): 5139-5148
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i21/5139.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5139
