Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2020; 8(16): 3474-3482
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3474
Table 1 Univariate analysis of potential risk factors for positive lymph node metastasis
FactorLymph node metastasis
Positive numberP value
Age (yr)0.839
< 60 (n = 19)4
≥ 60 (n = 12)30.850
Sex
Male (n = 21)
Female (n = 10)
Macroscopic type
I (n = 2)0
II (n = 22)6
III (n = 7)1
Family medical history0.904
Positive (n = 5)1
Negative (n = 26)6
Location0.317
Upper (n = 3)1
Middle (n = 8)0
Lower (n = 20)6
Number of tumors0.490
Single (n = 29)7
Multitude (n = 2)0
Depth of invasion0.036
Mucosa (n = 22)2
Submucosa (n = 9)5
Tumor size in diameter0.040
≤ 2 cm (n = 25)3
> 2 cm (n = 6)4
Lymphatic vessel involvement0.003
Negative (n = 23)1
Positive (n = 8)6
Ulceration0.589
Negative (n = 25)5
Positive (n = 6)2
Table 2 Multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for positive lymph node metastasis
FactorHazard ratio95%CIP value
Depth of invasion7.3421.127-33.2560.039
Mucosa
Submucosa
Tumor size9.1581.348-29.1330.044
≤ 2 cm
> 2 cm
Lymphatic vessel involvement27.7491.821-33.140.019
Negative0
Positive