Cho JH, Goo EJ, Kim KO, Lee SH, Jang BI, Kim TN. Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(1): 39-48 [PMID: 30637251 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Tae Nyeun Kim, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, 170 Hyeonchung-ro, Nam-gu, Daegu 42415, South Korea. tnkim@yu.ac.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, Research & Experimental
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Trials Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2019; 7(1): 39-48 Published online Jan 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39
Table 1 Aronchick bowel preparation scale
Grade
Point(s)
Description
Excellent
1
Small amount of clear liquid with clear mucosa seen; more than 95% of mucosa seen
Good
2
Small amount of turbid fluid without feces not interfering with examination; more than 90% of mucosa seen
Fair
3
Moderate amount of stool that can be cleared with suctioning permitting adequate evaluation of entire colonic mucosa; more than 90% of mucosa seen
Poor
4
Inadequate but examination completed; enough feces or turbid fluid to prevent a reliable examination; less than 90% of mucosa seen
Inadequate
5
Re-preparation required; large amount of fecal residue precludes a complete examination
Table 2 Boston bowel preparation scale
Point(s)
Description
0
Unprepared colon segment with stool that cannot be cleared
1
Portion of mucosa in segment seen after cleaning, but other areas not seen because of retained material
2
Minor residual material after cleaning, but mucosa of segment generally well seen
3
Entire mucosa of segment well seen after cleaning
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of the patients
0.5-L Group (n = 47)
1-L Group (n = 43)
Total (n = 90)
P value
Age, years
mean ± SD
49.7 ± 11.2
46.2 ± 10.8
48.0 ± 11.1
0.126
Median (range)
51 (29-72)
48 (22-64)
49 (22-72)
Sex (male)
29 (61.7)
32 (74.4)
61 (67.8)
0.287
BMI (kg/m2)
24.2 ± 3.1
25.0 ± 3.4
24.6 ± 3.4
0.150
Comorbidity
Diabetes
7 (14.9)
4 (9.3)
11 (12.2)
0.626
Hypertension
6 (12.8)
6 (14.0)
12 (13.3)
1.000
Abdominal surgery
10 (21.3)
9 (20.9)
19 (21.1)
1.000
Dietary compliance
23 (48.9)
18 (41.8)
41 (45.5)
0.369
Characteristic of last rectal effluent
0.412
Turbid liquid
34 (72.3)
27 (62.8)
61 (67.8)
Particulate liquid
13 (27.7)
15 (34.9)
28 (31.1)
Liquid with small amounts of feces
0 (0)
1 (2.3)
1 (1.1)
Number of defecations
3.0 ± 0.8
3.9 ± 1.3
3.5 ± 1.2
0.000
Interval between preparation and colonoscopy
86.3 ± 32.9
78.6 ± 27.1
82.6 ± 30.3
0.232
Table 4 Comparison of bowel preparation quality between study groups
0.5-L Group (n = 47)
1-L Group (n = 43)
Total (n = 90)
P value
ABPS
0.617
Excellent
7 (14.9)
7 (16.3)
14 (15.6)
Good
31 (66.0)
31 (72.1)
62 (68.9)
Fair
9 (19.1)
5 (11.6)
14 (15.6)
BBPS
Mean
6.7 ± 1.5
7.0 ± 1.7
6.8 ± 1.6
0.342
BBPS ≥ 8
13 (27.7)
16 (37.2)
29 (32.2)
0.458
Table 5 Results of colonoscopy
0.5-L Group (n = 47)
1-L Group (n = 43)
Total (n = 90)
P value
Cecal intubation
47 (100.0)
42 (97.7)
89 (98.9)
0.964
Cecal intubation time (min)
3.3 ± 1.7
3.6 ± 2.3
3.4 ± 2.0
0.507
Withdrawal time (min)
8.3 ± 2.3
7.9 ± 2.5
8.1 ± 2.4
0.432
PDR
17 (36.2)
19 (44.2)
36 (40.0)
0.575
ADR
13 (27.7)
16 (37.2)
29 (32.2)
0.870
Advanced ADR
3 (6.4)
4 (9.3)
7 (7.8)
1.000
Table 6 Other secondary points
0.5-L Group (n = 47)
1-L Group (n = 43)
Total (n = 90)
P value
Compliance to additional PEG + Asc
44 (93.6)
37 (86.0)
81 (90.0)
0.399
Adverse effects of PEG
31 (66.0)
23 (53.5)
54 (60.0)
0.322
Abdominal discomfort
29 (61.7)
28 (65.1)
57 (63.3)
0.907
Nausea
33 (70.2)
25 (58.1)
58 (64.4)
0.33
Vomiting
5 (10.6)
7 (16.3)
12 (13.3)
0.634
Patient’s satisfaction
6.7 ± 1.8
5.9 ± 1.9
6.3 ± 1.9
0.041
Citation: Cho JH, Goo EJ, Kim KO, Lee SH, Jang BI, Kim TN. Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(1): 39-48