Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2019; 7(1): 39-48
Published online Jan 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39
Table 1 Aronchick bowel preparation scale
GradePoint(s)Description
Excellent1Small amount of clear liquid with clear mucosa seen; more than 95% of mucosa seen
Good2Small amount of turbid fluid without feces not interfering with examination; more than 90% of mucosa seen
Fair3Moderate amount of stool that can be cleared with suctioning permitting adequate evaluation of entire colonic mucosa; more than 90% of mucosa seen
Poor4Inadequate but examination completed; enough feces or turbid fluid to prevent a reliable examination; less than 90% of mucosa seen
Inadequate5Re-preparation required; large amount of fecal residue precludes a complete examination
Table 2 Boston bowel preparation scale
Point(s)Description
0Unprepared colon segment with stool that cannot be cleared
1Portion of mucosa in segment seen after cleaning, but other areas not seen because of retained material
2Minor residual material after cleaning, but mucosa of segment generally well seen
3Entire mucosa of segment well seen after cleaning
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of the patients
0.5-L Group (n = 47)1-L Group (n = 43)Total (n = 90)P value
Age, years
mean ± SD49.7 ± 11.246.2 ± 10.848.0 ± 11.10.126
Median (range)51 (29-72)48 (22-64)49 (22-72)
Sex (male)29 (61.7)32 (74.4)61 (67.8)0.287
BMI (kg/m2)24.2 ± 3.125.0 ± 3.424.6 ± 3.40.150
Comorbidity
Diabetes7 (14.9)4 (9.3)11 (12.2)0.626
Hypertension6 (12.8)6 (14.0)12 (13.3)1.000
Abdominal surgery10 (21.3)9 (20.9)19 (21.1)1.000
Dietary compliance23 (48.9)18 (41.8)41 (45.5)0.369
Characteristic of last rectal effluent0.412
Turbid liquid34 (72.3)27 (62.8)61 (67.8)
Particulate liquid13 (27.7)15 (34.9)28 (31.1)
Liquid with small amounts of feces0 (0)1 (2.3)1 (1.1)
Number of defecations3.0 ± 0.83.9 ± 1.33.5 ± 1.20.000
Interval between preparation and colonoscopy86.3 ± 32.978.6 ± 27.182.6 ± 30.30.232
Table 4 Comparison of bowel preparation quality between study groups
0.5-L Group (n = 47)1-L Group (n = 43)Total (n = 90)P value
ABPS0.617
Excellent7 (14.9)7 (16.3)14 (15.6)
Good31 (66.0)31 (72.1)62 (68.9)
Fair9 (19.1)5 (11.6)14 (15.6)
BBPS
Mean6.7 ± 1.57.0 ± 1.76.8 ± 1.60.342
BBPS ≥ 813 (27.7)16 (37.2)29 (32.2)0.458
Table 5 Results of colonoscopy
0.5-L Group (n = 47)1-L Group (n = 43)Total (n = 90)P value
Cecal intubation47 (100.0)42 (97.7)89 (98.9)0.964
Cecal intubation time (min)3.3 ± 1.73.6 ± 2.33.4 ± 2.00.507
Withdrawal time (min)8.3 ± 2.37.9 ± 2.58.1 ± 2.40.432
PDR17 (36.2)19 (44.2)36 (40.0)0.575
ADR13 (27.7)16 (37.2)29 (32.2)0.870
Advanced ADR3 (6.4)4 (9.3)7 (7.8)1.000
Table 6 Other secondary points
0.5-L Group (n = 47)1-L Group (n = 43)Total (n = 90)P value
Compliance to additional PEG + Asc44 (93.6)37 (86.0)81 (90.0)0.399
Adverse effects of PEG31 (66.0)23 (53.5)54 (60.0)0.322
Abdominal discomfort29 (61.7)28 (65.1)57 (63.3)0.907
Nausea33 (70.2)25 (58.1)58 (64.4)0.33
Vomiting5 (10.6)7 (16.3)12 (13.3)0.634
Patient’s satisfaction6.7 ± 1.85.9 ± 1.96.3 ± 1.90.041