Letter to the Editor
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2025; 13(28): 109664
Published online Oct 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i28.109664
Table 1 Limitations of the Kupietzky et al’s study[1]
Limitation type
Specific issue
Potential impact
Design limitationsRetrospective design prone to selection/information bias; Excluded patients with complicated appendicitisRecurrence rates in NOM group may be skewed; Findings may not generalize to mixed populations
Sample size/PowerOnly 68 patients with appendicoliths (8.5% of cohort); Follow-up duration varied (median 44.2 months)Underpowered to detect subgroup differences; Long-term recurrence risks underestimated
Clinical HeterogeneityMultiple surgeons involved in NOM decisions; Non-standardized imaging follow-up protocolsVariability in intervention consistency; Reduced reliability of results
External validitySingle-center study (Hadassah Medical Center, Israel)Findings may not apply to other healthcare settings or cultural contexts
Table 2 Comparative analysis of the impact of appendicoliths on nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis
Dimension
Conclusion of Kupietzky et al’s study[1] conclusion (797 patients)
Conclusion of other studies (systematic reviews/meta-analyses)
Difference in perspective
Overall recurrence rateNo significant difference (26.5% vs 19.1%, P = 0.14)Significantly increased (OR = 2.75; 95%CI: 1.05-7.20)Study populations differ (current study restricted to uncomplicated cases; other studies include complicated cases)
Treatment failure rateNo statistical difference (26.5% vs 19.1%, P = 0.14; short-term follow-up within 30 days)Significant failure (OR = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.21-0.84; long-term follow-up including 30 days to 2 years)Definition of failure varies (short-term vs extended follow-up)
Impact of appendicolith characteristicsNo correlation with recurrence (sample size n = 68; insufficient power for subgroup analysis)Stone size, location (e.g., proximal), and number may increase risk (mechanistic studies suggest mechanical obstruction)Limited by sample size and study design
Pediatric patientsNot specifically analyzed (mean age 254 years)Stronger negative impact in childrenAge stratification missing
Clinical recommendationsPrioritize surgery (e.g., laparoscopic appendectomy); if NOM is chosen, close surveillance is warrantedRecommend surgery for appendicoliths; inform patients of recurrence risks (approximately 23%-30%) and consider interval appendectomyVariability in evidence strength