Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2025; 13(28): 109664
Published online Oct 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i28.109664
Published online Oct 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i28.109664
Table 1 Limitations of the Kupietzky et al’s study[1]
Limitation type | Specific issue | Potential impact |
Design limitations | Retrospective design prone to selection/information bias; Excluded patients with complicated appendicitis | Recurrence rates in NOM group may be skewed; Findings may not generalize to mixed populations |
Sample size/Power | Only 68 patients with appendicoliths (8.5% of cohort); Follow-up duration varied (median 44.2 months) | Underpowered to detect subgroup differences; Long-term recurrence risks underestimated |
Clinical Heterogeneity | Multiple surgeons involved in NOM decisions; Non-standardized imaging follow-up protocols | Variability in intervention consistency; Reduced reliability of results |
External validity | Single-center study (Hadassah Medical Center, Israel) | Findings may not apply to other healthcare settings or cultural contexts |
Table 2 Comparative analysis of the impact of appendicoliths on nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis
Dimension | Conclusion of Kupietzky et al’s study[1] conclusion (797 patients) | Conclusion of other studies (systematic reviews/meta-analyses) | Difference in perspective |
Overall recurrence rate | No significant difference (26.5% vs 19.1%, P = 0.14) | Significantly increased (OR = 2.75; 95%CI: 1.05-7.20) | Study populations differ (current study restricted to uncomplicated cases; other studies include complicated cases) |
Treatment failure rate | No statistical difference (26.5% vs 19.1%, P = 0.14; short-term follow-up within 30 days) | Significant failure (OR = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.21-0.84; long-term follow-up including 30 days to 2 years) | Definition of failure varies (short-term vs extended follow-up) |
Impact of appendicolith characteristics | No correlation with recurrence (sample size n = 68; insufficient power for subgroup analysis) | Stone size, location (e.g., proximal), and number may increase risk (mechanistic studies suggest mechanical obstruction) | Limited by sample size and study design |
Pediatric patients | Not specifically analyzed (mean age 254 years) | Stronger negative impact in children | Age stratification missing |
Clinical recommendations | Prioritize surgery (e.g., laparoscopic appendectomy); if NOM is chosen, close surveillance is warranted | Recommend surgery for appendicoliths; inform patients of recurrence risks (approximately 23%-30%) and consider interval appendectomy | Variability in evidence strength |
- Citation: Tian J. Appendicolith in non-operative management of acute appendicitis: Implications for recurrence and future directions. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(28): 109664
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v13/i28/109664.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i28.109664