Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2024; 12(24): 5534-5541
Published online Aug 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5534
Published online Aug 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5534
Table 1 Basic clinical data of children in the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Control group | Observation group | t/χ2 | P value | |
Case (n) | 42 | 42 | |||
Age | Maximum | 10 | 11 | 0.079 | 0.694 |
Minimum | 6 | 6 | |||
Average | 8.79 ± 1.08 | 8.87 ± 1.17 | 0.354 | 0.443 | |
Height (cm) | Maximum | 141 | 144 | 3.977 | 0.051 |
Minimum | 113 | 111 | |||
Average | 126.59 ± 2.52 | 125.34 ± 2.40 | 1.679 | 0.098 | |
Body quality (kg/m2) | Highest | 20.69 | 21.38 | 0.760 | 0.308 |
Lowest | 15.35 | 15.30 |
Table 2 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups
Group | Control group | Observation group | t/χ2 | P value |
Case (n) | 42 | 42 | ||
Healing | 0 | 5 | ||
Significant | 17 | 25 | ||
Effective | 15 | 9 | ||
Invalid | 10 | 3 | ||
Total effective rate, n (%) | 32 (76.19) | 39 (92.86) | 17.163 | 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of growth indicators between the two groups of children (mean ± SD)
Group | Control group | Observation group | t | P value |
Growth rate (%) | ||||
Before intervention | 4.56 ± 0.61 | 4.81 ± 0.75 | 1.715 | 0.090 |
After intervention | 3.56 ± 0.59 | 2.25 ± 0.89 | 8.190 | 0.001 |
Height (cm) | ||||
Before intervention | 125.26 ± 3.00 | 125.11 ± 2.95 | 0.222 | 0.829 |
After intervention | 133.44 ± 2.33 | 127.81 ± 2.43 | 10.934 | 0.001 |
Bone age (year) | ||||
Before intervention | 8.80 ± 0.50 | 8.91 ± 0.64 | 0.941 | 0.348 |
After intervention | 9.24 ± 0.64 | 7.21 ± 0.33 | 18.836 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of ovarian function indicators between the two groups of children (mean ± SD)
Group | Control group | Observation group | t | P value |
P (ng/mL) | ||||
Before intervention | 4.76 ± 1.60 | 4.83 ± 1.69 | 0.141 | 0.891 |
After intervention | 2.94 ± 0.73 | 2.14 ± 0.64 | 5.466 | 0.001 |
T (nmol/L) | ||||
Before intervention | 6.78 ± 2.16 | 6.73 ± 2.22 | 0.148 | 0.881 |
After intervention | 4.46 ± 1.44 | 3.11 ± 1.12 | 4.757 | 0.001 |
E2 (pg/mL) | ||||
Before intervention | 30.34 ± 5.72 | 30.85 ± 5.69 | 0.387 | 0.706 |
After intervention | 18.76 ± 2.92 | 11.44 ± 2.75 | 11.814 | 0.001 |
PRL (ng/mL) | ||||
Before intervention | 12.76 ± 3.51 | 13.05 ± 3.64 | 0.370 | 0.712 |
After intervention | 11.00 ± 2.54 | 8.93 ± 2.79 | 3.591 | 0.001 |
LH (U/L) | ||||
Before intervention | 3.16 ± 0.08 | 3.19 ± 0.08 | 0.569 | 0.572 |
After intervention | 2.14 ± 0.36 | 1.51 ± 0.27 | 9.314 | 0.001 |
FSH (IU/L) | ||||
Before intervention | 15.22 ± 5.26 | 15.36 ± 5.15 | 0.123 | 0.913 |
After intervention | 8.76 ± 2.57 | 6.27 ± 2.35 | 4.615 | 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups of children, n (%)
Group | Control group | Observation group | Z | P value |
Case | 42 | 42 | ||
Sweat | 1 (2.38) | 0 (0) | ||
Back pain | 1 (2.38) | 0 (0) | ||
Dizziness | 0 | 0 | ||
Dry mouth | 1 (2.38) | 1 (2.38) | ||
Adverse reaction rate | 3 (7.14) | 1 (2.38) | 0.216 | 0.641 |
- Citation: Wang XM, Li W, Yang LQ, Luo R, Zhang CC. Effect of dietary with Zhibai dihuang pills and gonadotropin-releasing-hormone-analogue on girls with precocious and rapidly progressive puberty. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(24): 5534-5541
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i24/5534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5534