Yang H, Gao LJ, Lei J, Li Q, Cui L, Li XH, Yin WX, Tian SH. Relationship between neonatal respiratory distress syndrome pulmonary ultrasonography and respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest radiography grading. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4154-4165 [PMID: 39015913 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4154]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Hai Yang, Doctor, Deputy Director, Neonatal Intensive Care Center, Liupanshui Maternal and Child Care Service Center, No. 53 Liangdu Avenue, Zhongshan District, Liupanshui 553000, Guizhou Province, China. haiyang_lps@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Pediatrics
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4154-4165 Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4154
Table 1 Ultrasonography B-line and dual-lung 6-zone pulmonary consolidation score in children with respiratory distress syndrome
Classification
Ultrasonography changes
Ultrasonography scores
B-line
There are A-lines and the number of B-lines is < 3
0
B-lines appear between two consecutive ribs or more, i.e. B-lines ≥ 3
1
Dense and integrated B-line (without A-line)
2
Pulmonary consolidation
No pulmonary consolidation
0
Involved intercostal space, lung consolidation range ≤ 1/2 of the lung field
3
The range of the lung consolidation involving the intercostal space is greater than half of the lung field
4
Table 2 X-ray grading and imaging manifestations
X-ray grading
X-ray imaging manifestations
0
No image changes
I
The transparency of both lung fields is generally reduced, with evenly scattered small particles and reticular shadows visible
II
Except for the aggravation of grade I changes, bronchial inflation sign can be seen, extending to the middle and outer zones of the lung field
III
The lesion worsens, the transparency of the lung field decreases further, and the cardiac and diaphragmatic margins appear blurry
IV
The entire lung field appears as a white lung, with more pronounced bronchial inflation signs resembling bald branches
Table 3 Comparison of respiratory distress syndrome neonatal ultrasonography score, respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest X-ray grade before treatment
Items
n
Ultrasonography score, points
Respiratory distress score, points
Oxygenation index
Chest X-ray grade
0
I
II
III
IV
Sex
Male
50
26.68 ± 7.41
7.60 ± 1.32
7.99 ± 2.64
0
1
13
17
19
Female
23
26.87 ± 7.35
7.83 ± 0.98
7.76 ± 1.59
0
1
7
5
10
t/Z
−0.102
−0.730
0.388
−0.057
P value
0.919
0.468
0.699
0.955
Pregnancy duration in wk
< 32
29
25.66 ± 7.83
7.69 ± 1.26
7.59 ± 2.76
0
2
7
10
10
32–36
35
26.77 ± 6.95
7.57 ± 1.29
8.01 ± 2.17
0
0
11
11
13
> 36
9
30.11 ± 6.86
8.00 ± 0.87
8.66 ± 1.40
0
0
2
1
6
F/H
1.277
0.436
0.744
2.073
P value
0.285
0.648
0.479
0.355
Weight in g
< 1500
21
26.29 ± 8.28
7.76 ± 1.22
7.87 ± 3.06
0
1
6
5
9
1500–2500
38
26.29 ± 6.85
7.53 ± 1.22
7.56 ± 2.03
0
1
10
14
13
> 2500
14
28.64 ± 7.39
7.93 ± 1.27
8.97 ± 1.70
0
0
4
3
7
F/H
0.576
0.625
1.901
0.494
P value
0.565
0.538
0.157
0.781
First ultrasonography time in h
< 1
15
29.20 ± 6.13
8.07 ± 0.80
9.02 ± 2.65
0
0
2
3
10
1–1.5
39
25.23 ± 7.68
7.59 ± 1.33
7.68 ± 2.30
0
2
12
13
12
> 1.5
19
27.89 ± 7.09
7.53 ± 1.26
7.55 ± 2.06
0
0
6
6
7
F/H
1.954
1.000
2.135
5.689
P value
0.149
0.373
0.126
0.058
Table 4 Comparison of the respiratory distress syndrome neonatal ultrasonography score, respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest X-ray grade before and after treatment
Items
Before treatment, n = 73
After treatment, n = 73
t/Z
P value
Ultrasonography score (points)
26.74 ± 7.34
15.12 ± 6.11
17.324
< 0.001
Respiratory distress score (points)
7.67 ± 1.23
3.93 ± 1.25
47.887
< 0.001
Oxygenation index
7.92 ± 2.35
5.84 ± 2.13
9.543
< 0.001
Chest X-ray grade
0
0 (0.00)
32 (43.84)
−7.460
< 0.001
I
2 (2.74)
24 (32.88)
II
20 (27.40)
16 (21.92)
III
22 (30.14)
1 (1.37)
IV
29 (39.73)
0 (0.00)
Table 5 Correlation between the respiratory distress syndrome neonatal ultrasonography score and respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest X-ray grade before and after treatment (n = 73)
Comparator
Ultrasonography score
Before treatment
After treatment
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
Respiratory distress score
0.446
< 0.001
0.429
< 0.001
Oxygenation index
0.703
< 0.001
0.748
< 0.001
Chest X-ray grade
0.859
< 0.001
0.764
< 0.001
Table 6 Respiratory distress syndrome parameters
Categorical variable
AUC
SE
P value
Youden index
Optimal cutoff value
Sensitivity, %
Specificity, %
I–II
1.000
0.000
< 0.001
1.000
> 12
100.00
100.00
II–III
0.805
0.077
< 0.001
0.682
> 24
68.18
100.00
III–IV
0.946
0.030
< 0.001
0.795
> 30
93.10
86.36
Citation: Yang H, Gao LJ, Lei J, Li Q, Cui L, Li XH, Yin WX, Tian SH. Relationship between neonatal respiratory distress syndrome pulmonary ultrasonography and respiratory distress score, oxygenation index, and chest radiography grading. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4154-4165