Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2023; 11(24): 5678-5691
Published online Aug 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5678
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data of participants in four groups
Baseline data
Grade 1 hypertension experimental group (n = 40)
Grade 2 hypertension experimental group (n = 40)
Grade 3 hypertension experimental group (n = 40)
Control group (n = 40)
Statistical values
P value
Age (yr)< 6031293028χ2 = 0.6460.886
≥ 609111012
SexMale28252325χ2 = 1.3690.713
Female12151715
Combined diabetesYes108910χ2 = 0.3870.946
No30323130
BMI (kg/m2)≤ 2415141513χ2 = 0.3000.960
> 2425262527
Smoking historyYes12101211χ2 = 0.3400.952
No28302829
Drinking historyYes10111311χ2 = 0.5870.899
No30292729
NYHA cardiac functional classificationGrade I33313233Z = 0.5880.557
Grade II6787
Grade III1200
Grade IV0000
Course of hypertension (mean ± SD, yr)5.25 ± 2.155.35 ± 2.255.47 ± 2.17-F = 0.1100.896
Table 2 Comparison of expression of relevant indicators of inflammation and vascular endothelial injury among the four groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Number of patients
hs-CRP (mmol/L)
TM (μg/L)
Grade 1 hypertension experimental group402.05 ± 0.8520.15 ± 1.05
Grade 2 hypertension experimental group404.15 ± 1.0522.85 ± 1.35
Grade 3 hypertension experimental group405.45 ± 1.2026.12 ± 2.25
Control group401.72 ± 0.325.41 ± 1.20
F value-149.7201420.213
P value-< 0.001< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of hemorheological indexes among the four groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Number of cases
Hct (%)
ESR (mm/h)
Grade 1 hypertension experimental group4040.85 ± 3.1530.25 ± 5.85
Grade 2 hypertension experimental group4041.25 ± 3.4542.15 ± 6.25
Grade 3 hypertension experimental group4043.25 ± 4.2560.15 ± 8.15
Control group4039.56 ± 2.8525.12 ± 5.05
F value-7.810234.107
P value-< 0.001< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of platelet-related indicators among the four groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Number of patients
CD62P (%)
PLT (× 109)
Grade 1 hypertension experimental group408.85 ± 1.18115.68 ± 40.15
Grade 2 hypertension experimental group4011.12 ± 1.35108.56 ± 35.85
Grade 3 hypertension experimental group4013.10 ± 1.7595.25 ± 30.12
Control group406.25 ± 1.05135.25 ± 50.12
F value-190.2807.052
P value-< 0.001< 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of coagulation related indicators among the four groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Number of patients
APTT (s)
PT (s)
TT (s)
FIB (g/L)
Grade 1 hypertension experimental group4029.25 ± 2.71b11.98 ± 0.50b15.95 ± 1.08b3.20 ± 0.51b
Grade 2 hypertension experimental group4027.25 ± 2.24a10.82 ± 0.92a15.01 ± 0.89a5.12 ± 0.68a
Grade 3 hypertension experimental group4025.42 ± 1.52a10.02 ± 0.34a14.02 ± 0.65a6.19 ± 1.15a
Control group4030.12 ± 2.6512.31 ± 0.5216.08 ± 1.123.01 ± 0.42
F value-315.25105.522174.21882.151
P value-< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Table 6 Logistic regression analysis of the above indicators and prethrombotic state of primary hypertension
Variable
B
SE
Wals
P value
OR value
95%CI
Upper limit
Lower limit
Constant-2.7170.66516.720< 0.0010.066--
hs-CRP1.5350.30725.086< 0.0014.6432.5468.468
TM0.6840.2487.5840.0061.9821.2183.226
Hct0.1840.05810.2190.0011.2021.0741.346
ESR0.2260.04229.282< 0.0011.2541.1551.361
CD62P2.2610.48621.684< 0.0019.5923.70424.842
PLT0.0170.00512.958< 0.0011.0171.0081.027
APTT0.7160.12811.664< 0.0011.9261.4212.158
PT0.8050.14815.660< 0.0012.1921.6052.840
TT0.9240.10813.348< 0.0012.4901.8083.418
FIB5.2120.86319.566< 0.00188.42318.137427.013
Table 7 Efficacy analysis of each indicator in predicting primary hypertension
Indicator
AUC
95%CI for AUC
Standard error
P value
Cut-off value
Sensitivity
Specificity
hs-CRP0.8900.840-0.9410.026< 0.0011.1350.9500.975
TM0.9890.972-1.0000.009< 0.00118.3450.9920.05
Hct0.6760.586-0.7660.0460.00134.9900.9670.975
ESR0.9110.867-0.9550.022< 0.00117.3650.9920.975
CD62P0.9820.966-0.9970.008< 0.0016.6350.9920.325
PLT0.6800.572-0.7880.0550.00147.2900.9750.975
APTT0.9870.973-1.0000.007< 0.00138.6500.9920.650
PT0.9420.908-0.9750.017< 0.00112.8100.9920.875
TT0.9290.890-0.9680.020< 0.00112.6800.9920.975
FIB0.9570.929-0.9860.015< 0.0012.1100.9750.267
Table 8 Efficacy analysis of each indicator in predicting primary hypertension
Indicator
hs-CRP
TM
Hct
ESR
CD62P
PLT
APTT
PT
TT
FIB
hs-CRP-0.792a0.237 (0.003)0.782a0.753a-0.296a-0.794a-0.652a-0.631a0.802a
TM0.792a-0.300a0.818a0.813a-0.329a-0.856a-0.734a-0.682a0.846a
Hct0.237 (0.003)0.300a-0.317a0.279a-0.113 (0.153)-0.295a-0.201 (0.011)-0.279a0.318a
ESR0.782a0.818a0.317a-0.788a-0.267 (0.001)-0.821a-0.665a-0.626a0.830a
CD62P0.753a0.813a0.279a0.788a--0.246 (0.002)-0.850a-0.707a-0.668a0.814a
PLT-0.296a-0.329a-0.113 (0.153)-0.267 (0.001)-0.246 (0.002)-0.331a0.214 (0.007)0.223 (0.005)-0.272 (0.001)
APTT0.794a0.856a0.295a0.821a0.850a-0.331-0.677a0.681a-0.843a
PT0.652a0.734a0.201 (0.011)0.665a0.707a-0.214 (0.007)0.677a-0.534a-0.739a
TT0.631a0.682a0.279a0.626a0.668a-0.223 (0.005)0.681a0.534a--0.674a
FIB0.802a0.846a0.318a0.830a0.814a-0.272 (0.001)-0.843a-0.739a-0.674a-