Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 26, 2022; 10(9): 2773-2782
Published online Mar 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i9.2773
Table 1 Responsiveness scores of the modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale
Responsiveness
Score
Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone5
Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone4
Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly3
Responds only after mild prodding or shaking2
Responds only after painful trapezius squeeze1
Does not respond to painful trapezius squeeze0
Table 2 The prior probability of moderate sedation at six doses of intranasal sufentanil
Dose level, μg/kg
Response probability
00.5
0.10.75
0.20.9
0.30.95
0.40.98
0.50.99
Table 3 Demographic data and key characteristics of subjects
Parameter
Value
Age (yr)42 (26-59)
Height (cm)167.77 (7.58)
Weight (kg)66.00 (9.64)
BMI (kg/m2)23.46 (2.99)
Gender (F/M)15/15
ASA-I/II21/9
Baseline heart rate (per min)75.80 (12.10)
Baseline SpO2 (%)99 (96-100)
Procedure duration (min)29.80 (3.63)
Table 4 The posterior probability for each intranasal sufentanil
PatientsAllocated SUF dose, μg/kgClinical response(Success 1, Failure 0) SUF dose, μg/kg
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Prior estimated probability for each dose (%)
50
75
90
95
98
99
Posterior probability for each dose (%)
1-30.31,1,162.580.091.695.798.399.1
4-60.31,1,165.482.092.596.298.599.2
7-90.31,1,167.883.693.396.698.699.3
10-120.31,1,170.084.993.996.998.899.4
13-150.21,1,173.687.094.897.499.099.5
16-180.21,1,176.488.795.597.899.199.6
19-210.21,0,047.471.788.294.097.698.8
22-240.31,1,149.373.188.894.397.798.9
25-270.31,1,151.174.389.494.697.898.9
28-300.31,1,152.875.489.994.998.099.0
Table 5 Adverse events and satisfaction after intranasal dexmedetomidine and sufentanil
SUF dose, μg/kg
P value

0.2 (n = 9)
0.3 (n = 21)
Hypotension, n01
Nausea and vomiting, n12
Local mucosal irritation, n11
Endoscopist’s satisfaction, mean (SD)8.7 (0.9)8.5 (1.3)0.654
Patients’ satisfactions, mean (SD)9.0 (1.1)8.1 (1.0)0.052