Zou Y, Li N, Shao LJZ, Liu FK, Xue FS, Tao X. Determination of the ED95 of intranasal sufentanil combined with intranasal dexmedetomidine for moderate sedation during endoscopic ultrasonography. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(9): 2773-2782 [PMID: 35434098 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i9.2773]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Xing Tao, MD, Doctor, Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-An Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing 100050, China. taoxing43@sina.com
Research Domain of This Article
Anesthesiology
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Trials Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Mar 26, 2022; 10(9): 2773-2782 Published online Mar 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i9.2773
Table 1 Responsiveness scores of the modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale
Responsiveness
Score
Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone
5
Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone
4
Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly
3
Responds only after mild prodding or shaking
2
Responds only after painful trapezius squeeze
1
Does not respond to painful trapezius squeeze
0
Table 2 The prior probability of moderate sedation at six doses of intranasal sufentanil
Dose level, μg/kg
Response probability
0
0.5
0.1
0.75
0.2
0.9
0.3
0.95
0.4
0.98
0.5
0.99
Table 3 Demographic data and key characteristics of subjects
Parameter
Value
Age (yr)
42 (26-59)
Height (cm)
167.77 (7.58)
Weight (kg)
66.00 (9.64)
BMI (kg/m2)
23.46 (2.99)
Gender (F/M)
15/15
ASA-I/II
21/9
Baseline heart rate (per min)
75.80 (12.10)
Baseline SpO2 (%)
99 (96-100)
Procedure duration (min)
29.80 (3.63)
Table 4 The posterior probability for each intranasal sufentanil
Patients
Allocated SUF dose, μg/kg
Clinical response(Success 1, Failure 0)
SUF dose, μg/kg
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Prior estimated probability for each dose (%)
50
75
90
95
98
99
Posterior probability for each dose (%)
1-3
0.3
1,1,1
62.5
80.0
91.6
95.7
98.3
99.1
4-6
0.3
1,1,1
65.4
82.0
92.5
96.2
98.5
99.2
7-9
0.3
1,1,1
67.8
83.6
93.3
96.6
98.6
99.3
10-12
0.3
1,1,1
70.0
84.9
93.9
96.9
98.8
99.4
13-15
0.2
1,1,1
73.6
87.0
94.8
97.4
99.0
99.5
16-18
0.2
1,1,1
76.4
88.7
95.5
97.8
99.1
99.6
19-21
0.2
1,0,0
47.4
71.7
88.2
94.0
97.6
98.8
22-24
0.3
1,1,1
49.3
73.1
88.8
94.3
97.7
98.9
25-27
0.3
1,1,1
51.1
74.3
89.4
94.6
97.8
98.9
28-30
0.3
1,1,1
52.8
75.4
89.9
94.9
98.0
99.0
Table 5 Adverse events and satisfaction after intranasal dexmedetomidine and sufentanil
SUF dose, μg/kg
P value
0.2 (n = 9)
0.3 (n = 21)
Hypotension, n
0
1
Nausea and vomiting, n
1
2
Local mucosal irritation, n
1
1
Endoscopist’s satisfaction, mean (SD)
8.7 (0.9)
8.5 (1.3)
0.654
Patients’ satisfactions, mean (SD)
9.0 (1.1)
8.1 (1.0)
0.052
Citation: Zou Y, Li N, Shao LJZ, Liu FK, Xue FS, Tao X. Determination of the ED95 of intranasal sufentanil combined with intranasal dexmedetomidine for moderate sedation during endoscopic ultrasonography. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(9): 2773-2782