Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2022; 10(31): 11454-11465
Published online Nov 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11454
Published online Nov 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11454
Complications | A; B; C; D; E | A; B; C; F; G | A; B; D; E | A; B; E | B; I | |
Outcomes | Operation time; intraoperative blood loss; fracture healing time; HHS at the last follow-up | Operation time; intraoperative blood loss; fracture healing time; HHS at the last follow-up | Operation time; intraoperative blood loss; fracture healing time; HHS at the last follow-up | Operation time; intraoperative blood loss; fracture healing time; HHS at the last follow-up | Operation time; intraoperative blood loss; fracture healing time; HHS at the last follow-up | |
Type of fracture | Garden II/III/IV | Pauwels I/II/III | Garden II/III/IV | Garden II/III/IV | Garden I/II/III/IV | |
Study type | Retrospective study | Retrospective study | Retrospective study | Retrospective study | Retrospective study | |
Follow-up time | ≥ 6 mo | 5-18 mo | ≥ 12 mo | 3-18 mo | Unknown | |
G2 | CCS | CCS | CCS | CCS | CCS | |
G1 | FNS | FNS | FNS | FNS | FNS | |
Participants | G2 | 38, 48.8 ± 10.1 | 47, 43.7 ± 13.1 | 57, 53.2 ± 11.3 | 58, 49 | 19, 41.2 |
(n, age: mean ± SD) | G1 | 32, 49.4 ± 11.0 | 47, 47.8 ± 9.8 | 62, 54.0 ± 13.0 | 24, 52 | 15, 42.0 |
First author, year | Ren C (2021) [11] | Yang J (2021) [12] | Xiong W (2021) [13] | Yan C (2021) [14] | Yang Y (2021) [15] | |
Complications | A; B; E; H | A; D; E | B; E; H; I | A; B; E; D | B | |
Outcomes | Operation time; intraoperative blood loss; fracture healing time; HHS at the last follow-up | Operation time; intraoperative blood loss; HHS at the last follow-up | Operation time; fracture healing time; HHS at the last follow-up | Operation time; intraoperative blood loss; fracture healing time; HHS at the last follow-up | Operation time | |
Type of fracture | Pauwels I/II/III | Pauwels III | Garden I/II/III/IV | Pauwels I/II/III | Garden I/II | |
Study type | Retrospective study | Retrospective study | Retrospective study | Retrospective study | Retrospective study | |
Follow-up time | ≥ 6 mo | 10-22 mo | 12-24 mo | 14-24 mo | 3-6 mo | |
G2 | CCS | CCS | CCS | CCS | CCS | |
G1 | FNS | FNS | FNS | FNS | FNS | |
Participants | G2 | 24, 50.46 ± 9.26 | 30, 53.14 ± 7.19 | 36, 47.58 ± 10.31 | 45, 54.8 ± 11.7 | 32, 85 ± 6.6 |
(n, age: mean ± SD) | G1 | 20, 50.45 ± 8.45 | 30, 54.53 ± 6.71 | 33, 50.61 ± 10.30 | 47, 57.4 ± 15.0 | 15, 86.1 ± 4.6 |
First author (year) | Hu H (2021) [16] | Zhou X (2021) [17] | He C (2021) [18] | Tang Y (2021) [19] | Vazquez O (2021) [20] |
Complications | Number of cases (FNS/other implants) | OR (95%CI) | P | I2 (%) |
Deep venous thrombosis | 3/5 | 0.64 (0.15, 2.78) | 0.55 | 0 |
Thigh irritation | 0/15 | 0.02 (0.00, 0.38) | / | / |
- Citation: Wu ZF, Luo ZH, Hu LC, Luo YW. Efficacy of the femoral neck system in femoral neck fracture treatment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(31): 11454-11465
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i31/11454.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11454