Published online Jul 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.121605
Revised: May 31, 2026
Accepted: June 15, 2026
Published online: July 16, 2026
Processing time: 103 Days and 14.4 Hours
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be technically challenging in patients with congenital renal tract anomalies, particularly when establishing safe and accurate percutaneous access. Malrotation of the kidneys is the most common type of renal anomaly and alters the spatial relation between the hilum and calyceal system relative to their normal anatomical position. The use of fluoroscopic landmarks in these cases has been shown to be unreliable because of the altered spatial relations. There is an increased risk of access-related complications secondary to abnormal anatomy. The application of virtual reality (VR) based on three-dimensional reconstruction represents a new approach for improving the surgeon’s ability to understand spatial anatomy prior to performing a procedure.
A 57-year-old woman was referred to our institution for right-sided loin pain of 1 year’s duration. The patient underwent computed tomography urogram, which showed a malrotated right kidney with an anterolateral hilum. There was evi
This case demonstrates the feasibility of VR-assisted preoperative planning for PCNL in anatomically complex kidneys.
Core Tip: Immersive virtual reality reconstruction from computed tomography DICOM data may assist with preoperative access planning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in anatomically complex kidneys by improving appreciation of calyceal orientation and access trajectory.
- Citation: Kothapalli S, Sriskandaraja T, Palaniyandi V, Sekar H, Krishnamoorthy S. Virtual reality-enabled precision in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - strategic access planning in a malrotated kidney: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(20): 121605
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i20/121605.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.121605
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard for treating renal calculi larger than 2 cm or complex renal stones[1]. Safe and accurate percutaneous access is the most important aspect of PCNL and has a direct effect on the success of surgery and complication rates[2]. Renal malrotation is a rare congenital anomaly that causes alterations in calyceal orientation and displacement of the renal hilum[3]. These anomalies can cause normal fluoroscopic landmarks to become unreliable for guiding PCNL. There have been many advancements in three-dimensional imaging and virtual reality (VR) technology, allowing patient-specific anatomical visualisation to assist surgeons in surgical planning and preparation[4]. The VR platform provides surgeons with an immersive view of a three-dimensional model of the patient’s anatomy, which may help identify safer routes for percutaneous access in complex cases. However, reports describing immersive VR-guided access planning for PCNL in patients with anomalous renal anatomy are limited. We present a case of a renal pelvic calculus in a malrotated kidney, in which a VR platform was used to create a patient-specific three-dimensional model for preoperative planning of the optimal percutaneous access trajectory before PCNL.
A 57-year-old woman presented with intermittent right-sided flank pain that had persisted for 1 year.
The patient reported a dull, aching pain in the right flank, which occurred intermittently over the preceding year. These episodes were not associated with haematuria, fever, dysuria, or other lower urinary tract symptoms. Over time, the frequency of pain episodes gradually increased, prompting further medical evaluation.
The patient had no known medical comorbidities or history of renal stone disease, urological interventions, or renal surgery.
There was no known relevant family history of urinary tract stones (urolithiasis) or congenital renal anomalies.
General physical examination findings were unremarkable. Abdominal examination revealed no palpable masses, tenderness, or organomegaly. Vital signs were within normal limits.
The results of routine laboratory investigations, including complete blood count, renal function tests, urinalysis, and urine culture, were within normal limits.
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) indicated malrotation of the right kidney. In addition to malrotation, the renal hilum of the right kidney was oriented anterolaterally. A 2.4 cm × 1.7 cm calculus was noted in the renal pelvis of the right kidney and measured 1569 Hounsfield units (Figure 1A). CECT revealed mild hydronephrosis and thickening of the urothelium of the renal pelvis. However, CECT did not reveal any abnormalities of the renal vessels or in
Considering the altered renal anatomy, advanced preoperative planning was performed. CECT DICOM images with a 1-mm slice thickness were manually segmented and reconstructed using a VR platform (Figure 1B). VR reconstruction enabled detailed visualisation of the renal axis, pelvicalyceal system, ribs, and adjacent anatomical structures. Interactive assessment of the model enabled a detailed appreciation of the altered calyceal orientation associated with renal malrotation. Based on this evaluation, the posterior lower calyx was identified as the most favourable access point, and a subcostal posterior percutaneous tract was planned to minimise the risk of vascular or visceral injury during PCNL (Figure 1C).
Renal pelvic calculus in a malrotated right kidney.
Standard PCNL was performed with the patient in the prone position under fluoroscopic guidance. A single posterior lower calyceal puncture (Figure 1D) was made through a subcostal access tract, as preoperatively planned using VR guidance. Sequential dilatation was performed up to 24 Fr, and pneumatic lithotripsy was used to fragment and remove the stones.
The operative time was 42 minutes, and the fluoroscopy time was 52 seconds. Blood loss was minimal. Tubeless PCNL was performed, and a 6 Fr/26 cm double-J ureteral stent was placed.
The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient remained haemodynamically stable, with minimal postoperative pain and no evidence of bleeding, fever, or urinary complications. Haemoglobin levels showed only a minimal decrease, and renal function remained within normal limits. As there was no significant bleeding, collecting system perforation, or residual stone burden, a tubeless PCNL approach was adopted, with placement of a 6 Fr/26 cm double-J ureteral stent without nephrostomy tube placement.
The patient recovered well and was mobilised on the first postoperative day. Minimal analgesics were required, and no adverse postoperative events occurred. She was discharged in a stable condition on postoperative day three with advice for routine follow-up.
A non-contrast computed tomography scan at 1 month postoperatively confirmed that the patient was stone-free. The patient has remained asymptomatic since then, with no indications of procedure-related complications.
Renal stones greater than 2 cm in size are best treated using PCNL. PCNL has a high success rate and an acceptable morbidity rate[1]. Although the overall success of PCNL depends on many factors, the single most important aspect of the entire procedure is obtaining accurate access to the target collecting system via the percutaneous route. If the initial access site is improperly placed, there are numerous potential complications, including haemorrhage, damage to adjacent intra-abdominal structures, and incomplete removal of the stone burden[2]. Anatomically, the kidneys may have additional complexities owing to the presence of certain anatomical abnormalities. Renal malrotation is a rare congenital renal deformity that occurs when the embryonic kidney does not ascend normally, resulting in an altered configuration of the renal pelvis and calyces[3]. In malrotated kidneys, the renal hilum may lie anteriorly or laterally. Therefore, the use of standard fluoroscopic landmarks to determine the ideal site for percutaneous entry into the collecting system is unre
VR models generated from computed tomography data allow immersive visualisation of patient-specific anatomy, including the collecting system, renal vasculature, ribs, and adjacent organs. Unlike conventional two-dimensional imaging, VR enables dynamic appreciation of depth and access trajectory, which may assist in preoperative puncture planning in anatomically complex kidneys[4-7]. Previous studies have demonstrated the potential value of three-dimen
| Ref. | Design | VR/3D technology | Clinical context | Key functional advantage | Procedural impact | Clinical relevance |
| Wake et al[4], 2020 | Systematic review | 3D printing, AR, VR | General urologic surgery | Enhanced spatial understanding | Not reported | Establishes conceptual framework for 3D/VR utility |
| Parkhomenko et al[6], 2019 | Pilot study | Immersive VR renal models | PCNL planning | Better calyceal orientation recognition | Not reported | Demonstrates feasibility in endourology |
| Porpiglia et al[5], 2018 | Review article | 3D virtual models | Preoperative urologic planning | Improved surgical orientation | Not reported | Supports patient-specific planning paradigm |
| Hosseini et al[8], 2024 | Randomized study | 3D virtual reconstruction | PCNL access planning | Increased puncture accuracy | Not reported | Provides comparative evidence vs fluoroscopy |
| Present case, 2026 | Case report | Patient-specific immersive VR (CT DICOM-based) | PCNL in malrotated kidney | Precise calyx selection & tract planning | Operative time: 42 minutes. Fluoroscopy: 52 seconds | Demonstrates real-world application in complex anatomy with optimal outcomes |
In the present case, VR reconstruction clearly identified the altered renal axis and calyceal orientation associated with the malrotated kidney. Through interactive review of the model, the posterior lower calyx was identified as the optimal site for percutaneous entry, and the planned subcostal tract was successfully replicated intraoperatively. This ultimately resulted in successful single-tract PCNL with complete stone clearance and no perioperative complications. Another significant factor was the performance of tubeless PCNL. Tubeless PCNL is considered safe in carefully selected patients who are expected to experience minimal bleeding, have no injury to the collecting system, and undergo complete stone clearance[11]. Therefore, based on these criteria, a nephrostomy tube was not placed, and only a double-J stent was inserted, resulting in faster postoperative recovery. This case highlights the potential role of immersive three-dimensional visualisation as an adjunctive planning tool for PCNL in anatomically complex kidneys. In situations in which conventional fluoroscopic landmarks are unreliable, such as renal malrotation, patient-specific VR reconstruction may assist surgeons in understanding the spatial orientation of the collecting system before entering the operating room. As advanced imaging technologies evolve, VR-assisted surgical planning may become an important component of precision-guided endourological surgery.
VR-assisted surgical planning requires specialised software and expertise for image segmentation and reconstruction, thereby limiting the widespread utilisation of this type of planning tool. In addition, operator familiarity with and access to dedicated VR software may further limit widespread implementation. Furthermore, as this is a single-case report, the clinical implications of VR-guided planning on surgical outcomes must be evaluated in larger multicentre studies.
As immersive imaging platforms become increasingly accessible, VR-assisted planning may become a practical adjunct to select complex endourological procedures. Potential future applications include integration of VR planning with aug
This case illustrates several clinically significant points regarding the use of advanced imaging modalities to support endourological intervention. Renal malformation alters conventional fluoroscopic anatomy and can complicate per
| 1. | Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475-482. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1383] [Cited by in RCA: 1176] [Article Influence: 117.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 2. | Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:899-906; discussion 906. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 576] [Cited by in RCA: 605] [Article Influence: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 3. | Ganpule AP, Desai MR. Urolithiasis in kidneys with abnormal lie, rotation or form. Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21:145-153. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in RCA: 12] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 4. | Wake N, Nussbaum JE, Elias MI, Nikas CV, Bjurlin MA. 3D Printing, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality for the Assessment and Management of Kidney and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Urology. 2020;143:20-32. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in RCA: 40] [Article Influence: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 5. | Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Checcucci E, Autorino R, Manfredi M, Iannizzi G, Fiori C; for ESUT Research Group. Current Use of Three-dimensional Model Technology in Urology: A Road Map for Personalised Surgical Planning. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4:652-656. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in RCA: 62] [Article Influence: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 6. | Parkhomenko E, O'Leary M, Safiullah S, Walia S, Owyong M, Lin C, James R, Okhunov Z, Patel RM, Kaler KS, Landman J, Clayman R. Pilot Assessment of Immersive Virtual Reality Renal Models as an Educational and Preoperative Planning Tool for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2019;33:283-288. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in RCA: 45] [Article Influence: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 7. | Shirk JD, Thiel DD, Wallen EM, Linehan JM, White WM, Badani KK, Porter JR. Effect of 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality Models for Surgical Planning of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy on Surgical Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1911598. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 59] [Cited by in RCA: 102] [Article Influence: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 8. | Hosseini SR, Tehranipour E, Khadem A, Alwedaie SMJ. Three-Dimensional Virtual Reconstruction Method versus Standard Fluoroscopy as a Guiding Tool for an Optimal Puncture Rout in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Trial Study. Urol J. 2024;21:29-34. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 9. | Liu Y, Song H, Wang B, Xiao B, Hu W, Xu Y, Su B, Li X, Li J. Application of Mixed Reality Technology in the Planning of PCNL for Special Types of Complex Upper Urinary Stones: A Pilot Study. Urology. 2025;196:40-47. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 10. | Lasmanovich R, Dagan M, Hemo O, Tejman-Yarden S, Zilberman DE, Vazhgovsky O, Dotan ZA, Kleinmann N, Shvero A. Initial experience with augmented reality in planning renal access for PCNL. Urolithiasis. 2025;53:69. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 11. | Xun Y, Wang Q, Hu H, Lu Y, Zhang J, Qin B, Geng Y, Wang S. Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2017;17:102. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 59] [Cited by in RCA: 51] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |